Hezbollah Warns Israel: Truce Must Be Mutual, Slams US "Insult" to Lebanon

Hezbollah's deputy leader, Naim Qassem, has declared that the current 10-day truce with Israel cannot be a one-sided arrangement and must be mutual. He strongly criticized the US-led diplomatic process, calling it an insult to Lebanon for allowing America to dictate terms. Qassem stated that despite the ceasefire, Hezbollah fighters remain in the field with "hands on the trigger," ready to respond to any Israeli violations. The truce's scope is contested, with Israel clarifying it does not cover Lebanon, while Iran claims it includes an end to hostilities against Hezbollah.

Key Points: Hezbollah Rejects Unilateral Truce, Slams US Diplomacy

  • Truce must be mutual, not unilateral
  • Hezbollah fighters on high alert
  • Slams US diplomacy as an insult
  • Conflicting narratives on truce scope
  • Lebanon-Israel held rare direct talks
3 min read

"Truce must be mutual": Hezbollah warns Israel, slams US-led diplomatic "insult" to Lebanon

Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem warns the ceasefire with Israel must be mutual, calling US-led talks an "insult" to Lebanon. Fighters remain on alert.

"A ceasefire means a complete cessation of all hostilities... the resistance fighters will remain in the field with their hands on the trigger. - Naim Qassem"

Beirut, April 19

Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem asserted on Saturday that the current 10-day truce with Israel cannot be a unilateral arrangement.

According to a report by Al Jazeera, Qassem vowed that his fighters are prepared to retaliate against any Israeli strikes targeting Lebanese territory.

In his initial response on Saturday to the ceasefire brokered by the United States, Qassem characterised the diplomatic process as "an insult to our country and our homeland, Lebanon, that America dictates its text and speaks on behalf of the Lebanese government."

These remarks follow a significant diplomatic development in Washington, where ambassadors from Lebanon and Israel held meetings ahead of anticipated direct negotiations, the first such talks between the two nations in decades.

Speaking in a televised statement, the Hezbollah chief clarified his group's stance on the cessation of hostilities. Al Jazeera quoted Qassem as stating, "A ceasefire means a complete cessation of all hostilities. Because we do not trust this enemy, the resistance fighters will remain in the field with their hands on the trigger, and they will respond to violations accordingly."

He further emphasised that the truce must be mutual to remain valid. "There is no ceasefire from the side of the resistance only, it must be from both sides," Qassem added, according to Al Jazeera.

The Hezbollah leader also voiced strong opposition to the recent diplomatic engagement in the United States. "Enough of subjecting Lebanon to these humiliations by negotiating directly with the Israeli enemy and listening to its dictates, and by the shameful spectacle in Washington," he remarked.

This rare direct engagement in Washington earlier this week culminated in an announcement by US President Donald Trump, who stated that both Israeli and Lebanese leadership had consented to a 10-day ceasefire.

Under the specific terms of the agreement, Israel maintains its "right to take all necessary measures in self-defence, at any time, against planned, imminent, or ongoing attacks."

Conversely, Lebanon is required to take "meaningful steps" to block Hezbollah and other "rogue non-state armed groups" from launching operations against Israeli targets.

While President Trump has issued a public warning to Hezbollah to "act nicely" throughout the duration of the truce, the group has countered with its own warning, stating their operatives have kept "hands on trigger."

The ceasefire landscape remains complex due to conflicting narratives regarding its scope.

When the truce was initially announced on April 7, Iran claimed the US President had endorsed a 10-point proposal that included an "end of hostilities" against Hezbollah in Lebanon.

However, the official US statement lacked any mention of Lebanon, a discrepancy that became prominent when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu clarified that the deal "did not cover Lebanon".

Following the Israeli stance, President Trump cautioned Tehran to respect the "real agreement" as tensions persist over the geographical limits of the truce.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Very complex situation. From an Indian perspective, we know the pain of cross-border tensions. A ceasefire with a clause that lets Israel take "all necessary measures" at any time doesn't sound very mutual, does it? Hope diplomacy prevails.
A
Arjun K
The whole region needs stability. But non-state armed groups like Hezbollah make it so difficult. Lebanon's government must assert its sovereignty and control its territory. The "hands on trigger" rhetoric helps no one.
S
Sarah B
The conflicting narratives from the US, Iran, and Israel are worrying. If even the scope of the ceasefire isn't clear, how can it hold? This seems like a very fragile peace. Direct talks between Lebanon and Israel are long overdue, though.
V
Vikram M
Respectfully, I think the Hezbollah leader's anger is misdirected. The "shameful spectacle" is the constant threat to civilians on both sides. The Lebanese people deserve peace, not more posturing from armed militias. The truce must be for the people.
K
Kavya N
Trump telling Hezbollah to "act nicely" is such a condescending phrase for a serious geopolitical issue. This isn't a schoolyard. The language used by all sides needs to be more mature if they want a lasting solution. Jai Hind.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50