NewKerala.com

Sengottaiyan's Nomination On Hold: Notary, Property Issues Spark TN Poll Drama

The nomination of Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam candidate K.A. Sengottaiyan in Gobichettipalayam has been kept pending following objections raised by the AIADMK. Rivals flagged alleged discrepancies, including an affidavit attested by a notary with an expired licence and the omission of a property under construction. Election authorities have sought detailed clarifications from Sengottaiyan's legal team before making a final decision. This development has intensified the political focus on the high-profile constituency ahead of the Tamil Nadu Assembly polls.

Key Points: TN Polls: TVK's Sengottaiyan Nomination Held Over Objections

  • Nomination scrutiny turns contentious
  • Objections over expired notary licence
  • Alleged omission of property details
  • Final decision pending clarifications
2 min read

TN polls: Nomination of TVK's Sengottaiyan put on hold over objections

Nomination of K.A. Sengottaiyan in Gobichettipalayam put on hold after AIADMK raises objections over notary validity & property disclosure.

"Officials indicated that a final decision... would be taken only after examining these clarifications. - Election Officials"

Coimbatore, April 7

The scrutiny of nomination papers in the run-up to the Tamil Nadu Assembly elections has taken a contentious turn in Gobichettipalayam, where the candidature of Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam nominee K.A. Sengottaiyan has been kept pending following objections raised by rival parties.

Election authorities have sought detailed clarifications before taking a final decision, adding a layer of uncertainty to the high-profile contest in the constituency.

Sengottaiyan, a seasoned politician and nine-time MLA with prior experience as a minister under the AIADMK regime, submitted his nomination papers earlier this week. However, during the mandatory scrutiny process, representatives of the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK), including its candidate V.B. Prabhu, flagged multiple alleged discrepancies in the affidavit filed by the veteran leader.

Among the key issues raised was the validity of the notary attestation on Sengottaiyan's affidavit.

AIADMK functionaries contended that the licence of the notary public who certified the document had expired, potentially rendering the affidavit invalid under election norms.

In addition, objections were also lodged regarding the alleged omission of details related to a residential property currently under construction, which, if proven, could amount to incomplete disclosure of assets.

Election officials have acknowledged the objections and initiated a review process in accordance with established procedures.

Returning Officer S. Sivanandham has directed Sengottaiyan and his legal team to submit the necessary explanations and supporting documents to address the concerns raised.

Officials indicated that a final decision on the acceptance or rejection of the nomination would be taken only after examining these clarifications.

The development has intensified political attention on Gobichettipalayam, a constituency with significant electoral weight and a history of closely watched contests.

While Sengottaiyan's camp has expressed confidence that the issues raised are procedural and will be resolved in due course, opposition parties maintain that strict adherence to electoral guidelines is essential to ensure transparency and fairness.

With the scrutiny process still underway, the outcome of this episode is expected to play a crucial role in shaping the electoral dynamics in the constituency ahead of polling.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
Typical last-minute drama before every Tamil Nadu election! 🤦‍♀️ AIADMK is just trying to create hurdles. Sengottaiyan is a veteran, he knows what he's doing. These are just technicalities that will be sorted. The real issue is development in Gobichettipalayam, not expired notary stamps.
D
David E
Watching from abroad, the scrutiny process seems quite robust. In many countries, such affidavit discrepancies, especially about undisclosed assets, would be a major scandal. It's good to see the Returning Officer is following procedure and asking for explanations. Transparency is key.
S
Suresh O
The property under construction detail is important. Voters have a right to know the complete financial picture of their candidate. Whether it's an omission or an oversight, it must be clarified. Full disclosure, no excuses. This is about accountability.
A
Anjali F
High-profile contest getting spicier! 🍿 But on a serious note, such objections are healthy for democracy. It keeps everyone on their toes. Let the process play out. The EC usually does a fair job in these matters. Hope the focus returns to actual poll issues soon.
M
Manish T
As a resident of Tamil Nadu, I see this every election cycle. Rivals will pounce on any small error. While rules must be followed, this often feels more like a political tactic than a genuine concern for transparency. The common man just wants good governance, not these dramas.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50