Carlos Brathwaite Slams DC's Powerplay Strategy Against PBKS

Carlos Brathwaite criticized Delhi Capitals for not being proactive with their bowling in the powerplay against Punjab Kings. DC gave 87 runs in the first five overs to Mukesh Kumar and Auqib Nabi, allowing PBKS to race to 116 without loss. Brathwaite suggested using Natarajan and Kuldeep earlier to stem the flow of runs and push the required rate higher. PBKS completed the highest successful chase in IPL history with seven balls to spare.

Key Points: Brathwaite: DC's Powerplay Strategy Cost Them vs PBKS

  • Brathwaite criticizes DC for not bowling Natarajan more in powerplay
  • DC gave 87 runs in first 5 overs to Mukesh Kumar and Auqib Nabi
  • Kuldeep Yadav was introduced only in the 8th over
  • PBKS chased 265, the highest successful chase in IPL history
  • Shreyas Iyer anchored chase with unbeaten 71 off 36 balls
3 min read

'They need to be more proactive': Braithwaite slams DC's powerplay strategy vs PBKS

Carlos Brathwaite criticizes Delhi Capitals for not using key bowlers like Natarajan and Kuldeep in the powerplay, allowing PBKS to chase 265 in IPL 2025.

"They could have been a little bit more proactive - Carlos Brathwaite"

New Delhi, April 26

Former West Indies all-rounder Carlos Brathwaite believes Delhi Capitals did not show enough proactiveness with the ball in the powerplay, allowing Punjab Kings to stay ahead in their record-breaking chase of 265 at the Arun Jaitley Stadium on Saturday.

Brathwaite pointed to lapses in DC's bowling plans despite having a daunting total to defend and also raised questions about the lesser use of Natarajan in the first six overs.

"When you bat and score 200 and a lot, you don't necessarily need to be defensive, but have a mindset that this can be scored. I saw Natarajan bowl just one over in the power play. They could have been a little bit more proactive," Braithwaite told ESPNCricinfo.

Defending 264 for 2, powered by KL Rahul's unbeaten 152 and Nitish Rana's 91, DC handed four of the first five overs to Mukesh Kumar and Auqib Nabi, who conceded a combined 87 runs. Captain Axar Patel also went for 20 in his over as PBKS raced to 116 without loss in the powerplay.

Brathwaite felt DC missed an opportunity to apply early pressure by not using their key bowlers upfront.

"Get Kuldeep on early. He may not get a wicket, but he may stem the flow of runs for an over. Natarajan took the pitch out of play. If Natarajan and Kuldeep had bowled three out of the first six overs, and PBKS had scored 65 in the powerplay, PBKS would have so much more to do," he said.

Left-arm wrist spinner Kuldeep Yadav was introduced only in the eighth over, by which time PBKS had already surged to 127, with Prabhsimran Singh and Priyansh Arya dominating the attack.

The strong start ensured that when PBKS captain Shreyas Iyer came in after the openers fell in the seventh and eighth overs, the required rate remained under control. Iyer went on to anchor the chase with an unbeaten 71 off 36 balls.

"They did so much in the powerplay that when Shreyas came in, he could be eight off his first eight balls," Brathwaite said. "That would never be possible if you need to score 19 or 20 per over, then everybody has to come in and go," he added.

Brathwaite further said that defending a total in excess of 260 demands aggressive intent with the ball from the very beginning.

"I think DC could have structured their game a little bit better. You know, with 260, you have to go from ball one and have to get ahead in the power play. Try to get wickets in the powerplay or bowl your best bowlers in the powerplay to be defensive but also push the required run rate up to 20, 21, 22."

DC's troubles were compounded in the field as Karun Nair dropped Iyer twice late in the innings, misses that proved costly as PBKS completed the highest successful chase in IPL history with seven balls to spare.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Honestly, Delhi Capitals have been bottling it for years. It's not just this match. The management keeps making weird decisions. Why bench your best bowlers when you have 264 on the board? Even in gully cricket we know you attack with your best. 🤦‍♀️
V
Vikram M
This analysis shows how crucial powerplay bowling is in T20. PBKS's openers just dominated. But let's give credit to Prabhsimran and Priyansh as well - they played fearless cricket. DC's bowling was disappointing but PBKS's batting was world-class. Simple as that.
A
Ananya R
I think Brathwaite makes a good point but it's easier said than done. Defending 265 in this season's flat pitches is a nightmare. Also, Natarajan hasn't been that great in T20s recently. But yes, Kuldeep should have bowled earlier - that was a clear tactical error by Axar. 😤
R
Rohit P
One thing I've noticed about DC: they always look underprepared. Too many changes, no settled playing XI. Even with 264, you could see the body language was nervous. Meanwhile PBKS chased it like it was a 180 total. IPL needs more strategists and less random captaincy. 🤷‍♂️
K
Kavya N
Respectfully disagree with Brathwaite here. 20 runs per over for 6 overs is crazy pressure on any bowler. Natarajan and Kuldeep are humans too. Sometimes you just have to accept that the other team batted really well. But yes, dropping I

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50