"Talk of IAEA inspectors' access to bombed sites is false": Iran's Parliament Speaker Ghalibaf
Tehran, July 2
Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said that Iran will not allow inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency to access bombed nuclear sites, saying the restriction is mandated by a law passed by parliament and the Supreme National Security Council.
"Talk of IAEA inspectors' access to bombed sites is false," Ghalibaf said during a televised interview with IRIB.
"We ourselves passed a law in the parliament; the Supreme National Security Council has also passed a law. According to this law, access to sites that have been bombed and damaged is not allowed under any circumstances. This is the law," he said.
"We do not grant any privileges beyond the access levels determined by the Supreme National Security Council. According to the law, the Supreme National Security Council is responsible for determining the level of access, and it has also specified its framework," he added.
"Currently, they only have access to two things: one is the Bushehr power plant and the other is the Tehran reactor. Access has only been limited to that extent, and we are committed to that," he said.
Defending his participation in talks in Switzerland, Ghalibaf said the negotiations had helped advance agreed conditions.
"In the Zurich [The Lake Lucerne Summit] talks, the release of assets was accelerated, and sanctions were suspended. If we hadn't gone, they wouldn't have said, 'Ghalibaf, what happened to the conditions?'" he said.
Referring to a message from Iran's Supreme Leader (Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei), Ghalibaf said, "In his message, the Leader of the Revolution tactfully emphasised that he and the people are waiting for the fulfilment of the terms of the understanding. What should I do in these circumstances? Should I not pursue the terms?!"
He also rejected criticism of his approach, saying diplomacy and military strength should go hand in hand.
"There are those who help the country neither in diplomacy nor in war, but I stand to both fight and conduct diplomacy," he said.
"Don't bother me any more, and don't repeat Trump's words, and let the people be at peace and proud of the Islamic Republic," he added.
On regional issues, Ghalibaf reiterated Iran's support for Lebanon and said, "The revenge of our martyred Imam is the liberation of Jerusalem, and for that we must protect Lebanon, and revenge cannot be sought with slogans." He added, "Our enemy understands nothing but the language of power, and we must deal with him with power."
Addressing domestic priorities, Ghalibaf said his responsibility was to serve all Iranians and emphasised economic stability, security and national unity.
"I have a duty to serve all Iranian people, regardless of their tastes or religions," he said. "We have a duty to solve economic problems and ensure the country's security," he added.
"Today, unity is more important to us than anything else," Ghalibaf said.
"The sacred unity around the Leader of the Revolution has meaning, and there is no tent other than the tent of the guardianship, the tent of the Commander of the Faithful," he added.
— ANI
Reader Comments
As an outsider, I find this very concerning. Iran says IAEA can only check Bushehr and Tehran reactor? That's like letting a doctor see your finger but not the wound. India manages its nuclear program with full IAEA safeguards since the US-India deal. Why can't Iran do the same? The "revenge" rhetoric about Jerusalem also feels like a distraction from real domestic issues—unemployment, inflation. Classic authoritarian playbook.
Ghalibaf makes a valid point about Western double standards. The US has a proven track record of breaking agreements—just look at the JCPOA withdrawal. India faced sanctions after 1998 tests and knows the price of nuclear autonomy. But Pakistan gets a pass from the West? Hypocrisy aside, Ghalibaf's call for national unity and economic stability is something we can relate to. Every Indian leader says the same thing. Ultimately, Iran's path is theirs—but secrecy rarely ends well.
I respect Iran's right to defend its sovereignty, but this law seems designed to hide something. If there's no intention to weaponize, why block inspectors? India manages nuclear cooperation transparently—even our foes acknowledge that. Ghalibaf's comment about "tent of guardianship" sounds like typical political theater. Focus on your people's bread and butter, not grand slogans about Jerusalem. Economies don't run on ideology.
Interesting how Ghalibaf invokes Khamenei's authority while deflecting criticism. Reminds me of our politicians who hide behind "party high command." The nuclear issue is serious, but his argument about "fighting and diplomacy" together is smart—look at India's dual approach with China and Pakistan. However, restricting IAEA access won't help Iran's case. The world will assume the worst. Why give ammunition to your enemies?
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.