Sun, 17 May 2026
India News Updated May 17, 2026 · 20:16

Taiwan Is No Pushover: Expert Warns of Catastrophic Chinese Losses in Invasion

Chinese Studies expert Professor Srikanth Kondapalli has warned that Taiwan is not a pushover, possessing advanced military capabilities that could inflict catastrophic casualties on invading Chinese forces, with at least 1 lakh soldiers killed. He stated that any armed conflict would derail China's economic security as nearly $4 trillion of trade passes through the Taiwan Strait. Kondapalli also assessed that US President Donald Trump's recent visit to Beijing was largely symbolic, yielding no major policy deliverables or joint statement. He noted that China has reportedly promised not to support Iran on nuclear issues, while complex negotiations over enriched uranium stockpiles continue.

"Taiwan no pushover": Chinese Studies Expert Srikanth Kondapalli warns Beijing faces catastrophic casualties in event of invasion

New Delhi, May 17

Highlighting Taipei's advanced defensive capabilities against aggressive state actors, Chinese Studies expert at Jawaharlal Nehru University, Professor Srikanth Kondapalli, has asserted that Taiwan is no pushover when compared to other major global flashpoints like Ukraine and warned that any military incursion by Beijing would result in catastrophic casualties for Chinese forces.

In an interview with ANI, Chinese Studies expert at Jawaharlal Nehru University, Professor Srikanth Kondapalli, broke down the long-term regional stability implications of US President Donald Trump's state visit to Beijing on May 13-15, emphasising that Taipei maintains high-tech operational military hardware capable of striking deep inside the mainland.

He explicitly noted, "Taiwan is no pushover when you compare Taiwan and Ukraine."

Evaluating the outcome of the summit between President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, Professor Kondapalli noted that a potential invasion would prove incredibly detrimental to China's global rise, as "a minimum one lakh Chinese soldiers will be killed if there is an invasion by China on Taiwan."

He explained that with nearly USD 4 trillion of China's trade passing through the Taiwan Strait, any armed conflict would completely derail Beijing's long-term economic security.

While the summit generated massive international headlines, displaying substantial corporate and political camaraderie, Professor Kondapalli stated that the US leader effectively left empty-handed with no major breakthrough policy deliverables.

"The visit by the United States President Donald Trump to Beijing on May 13-15, I think it is quite significant, but it appears that he left empty-handed," the JNU professor observed, pointing out that even though Trump carried a powerful business delegation of nearly 30 tech tycoons and CEOs, including Elon Musk, Tim Cook, and Jensen Huang, no major investment agreements were finalised.

He added that the summit turned out to be a big disappointment for Nvidia chief Jensen Huang, as no announcements materialised regarding the sales of H200 AI chips to China.

While noting that "the optics are substantial", featuring formal walks through the Rose Garden and grand banquets, Professor Kondapalli maintained that the structural economic impasse remains stark, reiterating that "there is nothing concrete out of the visit" and "there is no joint statement issued by the two sides."

Detailing the shifting security understandings emerging out of the high-stakes deliberations regarding Middle Eastern hostilities, Professor Kondapalli highlighted significant takeaways negotiated by the superpowers, stating that "the Chinese, according to Trump, have promised that they will not support Iran on the nuclear issue. And second is the militarisation of Straits of Hormuz, as Xi Jinping mentioned in his speech."

He revealed that complex back-channel negotiations are currently taking place between global powers regarding enriched stockpiles, specifically focusing on "taking away the 440 kilogrammes of enriched uranium and storing this in safe havens in Russia or in China."

This comes amid escalating anxieties over the Strait of Hormuz, where mounting hostile manoeuvres threaten not only international crude shipping but also critical "submarine cable links that are being threatened by Iran now, which has a lot of implications for data security."

When asked about the far-reaching regional implications for New Delhi, especially concerning a potential US-China-Pakistan strategic nexus, Professor Kondapalli explicitly warned that a developing G2 arrangement would create "a potential problem between China-US and China-India", stating that "this is going to be problematic for India."

He noted that while the overt coordination seen during historical friction points has not been formally declared this time, the structural risks remain identical to past crises, referencing previous regional deployments.

"The same reiteration has not happened during Trump-Xi meetings, but the impact would almost be the same as we saw the coordination between US-Pakistan on Operation Sindoor and also China and Pakistan in Operation Sindoor-related matters," he observed.

Furthermore, Professor Kondapalli strongly dismissed suggestions that recent border management talks signal a total return to normal, stressing that a dangerous geopolitical undercurrent still persists.

He drew attention to the diplomatic duplicity embedded in Beijing's language, pointing out that "it is interesting that Xi Jinping spoke about we are partners but not rivals when PM Modi visited Tianjin. The same words were repeated to Trump."

"This phrase came up after we had Galwan and we lost 20 Indian soldiers," Professor Kondapalli cautioned, concluding that "there is a potential problem between China-US and China-India", meaning New Delhi needs to be "very cautious about this impact."

— ANI

Found this useful?

Share with someone who'd want to read it

Continue reading

More in India News

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The professor makes a good point about Trump's visit being mostly optics. All those CEO handshakes and no actual deals? Typical showmanship. On Taiwan, I'm with the expert—any conflict there would be disastrous for everyone, including India. The Straits of Hormuz angle with Iran is also worrying for our energy security.
V
Vikram M
Good to see proper geopolitical analysis from an Indian expert. The Taiwan comparison with Ukraine is apt—both are small but well-prepared. What struck me most was the warning about US-Pakistan coordination during Operation Sindoor. We can't trust either superpower fully, India needs to be self-reliant. 🧐
J
James A
As a Westerner reading this, I find the analysis of Trump's 'empty-handed' visit interesting. The media here hyped it as a diplomatic triumph. Professor Kondapalli's critique of the 'partners not rivals' line from Xi after Galwan is sharp—that phrase seems to be Beijing's default for everyone, regardless of past conflicts.
K
Kavya N
Professor Kondapalli is spot on about the economic risks. $4 trillion in trade through the strait is enormous. But I'm slightly skeptical about the 'catastrophic casualties' claim—modern warfare isn't just body counts anymore. Drone strikes, cyber warfare, and blockades could change the game entirely. Still, a sobering reminder for India to strengthen its own borders.
S
Sarah B
This is a really detailed analysis. The bit about submarine cables in the Strait of Hormuz being threatened is alarming—we

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50