US Defends Venezuela Op as "Exact Opposite" of Iraq War, Captures Maduro

US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth has defended the military intervention in Venezuela, which resulted in the capture of President Nicolas Maduro and his wife. Hegseth asserted the operation was strategically the "exact opposite" of the 2003 Iraq invasion, designed to secure economic benefits without prolonged conflict or American casualties. President Trump praised the action as a historic display of military competence and stated the US would manage Venezuela's transition. Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, have been indicted on drug trafficking charges and will face trial in the United States.

Key Points: US Says Venezuela Intervention Differs from Iraq Invasion

  • Hegseth contrasts op with Iraq war
  • Maduro & wife captured in Caracas
  • Face US drug trafficking charges
  • Trump hails "display of American might"
  • US plans to oversee Venezuela transition
4 min read

Secretary of War says US intervention in Venezuela "exact opposite" to Iraq invasion

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth defends the US operation that captured Nicolas Maduro, calling it a strategic departure from the costly Iraq war.

Secretary of War says US intervention in Venezuela "exact opposite" to Iraq invasion
"It's the exact opposite. - Secretary of War Pete Hegseth"

Washington DC, January 4

US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth has defended Washington's military intervention in Venezuela, during which the US captured the country's president and deposed dictator Nicolas Maduro and his wife, asserting that the operation was the "exact opposite" of the 2003 Iraq invasion and would not result in prolonged conflict or loss of American lives.

In an interview with CBS Evening News on Saturday (local time), Hegseth was asked about concerns among Americans who may have been reminded of past US interventions, particularly the Iraq war, which led to significant loss of life and resources.

Responding to concerns, Hegseth said the operation in Venezuela marked a complete departure from past military engagements, adding that the current strategy focused on achieving objectives without putting American troops at risk.

"It's the exact opposite. We spent decades and decades and spent, purchased in blood and got nothing economically in return. And President Trump flips the script," he said.

"Through strategic action, we can ensure that we have access to additional wealth and resources, enabling a country to unleash that without having to spend American blood," the Secretary of War added.

On Saturday, Washington carried out a "large-scale strike against Venezuela", and the deposed dictator, Nicolas Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were captured and taken out of the country.

Maduro and Flores were captured in Caracas and flown out of the country in a joint operation involving intelligence agencies and US law enforcement.

Trump stated that Maduro and his wife have been indicted on charges of alleged "drug trafficking and narco-terrorism conspiracies" in the Southern District of New York and will face trial.

He said that American forces, working with law enforcement agencies, captured Maduro and his wife in a night-time operation.

Describing the operation as carefully planned, Hegseth said the move was "bold and audacious" but not impulsive, noting that the intervention would ultimately benefit the US, unlike what Americans had suffered during the Iraq invasion.

"This was a bold and audacious move, but it was thought through. It was well orchestrated. Our military had time to set it up. He provided the resources, and then he took that bold stroke and through it we flipped that very dynamic and Americans will benefit," Hegseth said to CBS Evening News.

In 2003, the US-led an invasion in Iraq on the fabricated claim that the country was hiding weapons of mass destruction, which led to the toppling of its dictator, Saddam Hussein, who was captured by the American troops.

He was later tried in an Iraqi court for crimes against humanity and executed by hanging in 2006.

Meanwhile, Trump, addressing a press conference in Florida following the operation, was "one of the most stunning, effective, and powerful displays of American military might and competence in American history."

He further stated that the US would run the country "until such time as we can do a safe, proper, and judicious transition," noting that his administration wants "peace, justice and liberty for the great people of Venezuela".

"We're going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper, and judicious transition. We want peace, justice and liberty for the great people of Venezuela," Trump said.

He said the US action was aimed at bringing "outlaw dictator Nicolas Maduro to justice", and that US companies will fix the broken oil infrastructure in the South American nation.

"This was one of the most stunning, effective, and powerful displays of American military might and competence in American history," the US President said.

"We're going to have our very large United States oil companies, the biggest anywhere in the world, go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure, the oil infrastructure, and start making money for the country," he added.

Trump said that Maduro and his wife "will soon face the full might of American justice and stand trial on American soil" for their alleged role in drug trafficking, adding that they are currently being taken to New York, with authorities to decide later whether the trial will be held in New York or Florida.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The arrogance is astounding. "We will run the country." Who gave them the right? This is exactly why the Global South is so wary of Western powers. They topple governments and then act as saviors. Venezuela's sovereignty has been completely trampled. 🇮🇳
A
Aman W
While Maduro was not a good leader, this sets a dangerous precedent. Any country with resources that a superpower wants can now be invaded under some pretext. The "drug trafficking" charges sound convenient. Hope our government takes a strong, principled stand on this.
S
Sarah B
I have to respectfully disagree with the tone of the article and some comments. If the intervention truly stopped a narco-state and liberates the Venezuelan people from a dictator without a long war, maybe it's a net positive? The proof will be in what happens next.
V
Vikram M
"Purchased in blood and got nothing economically in return" for Iraq. And now, "access to additional wealth and resources" for Venezuela. Hegseth just admitted the quiet part out loud! This is赤裸裸的 (chì luǒ luǒ de - blatant) imperialism. Shameful.
K
Karthik V
The parallel to Iraq is chilling. Saddam was toppled, tried by a local court, and hanged. Maduro is captured and will be tried in New York. The script is the same, only the location of the "justice" has changed. When will this cycle end?

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50