SEBI Eases AIF Winding-Up Rules, Approves Net Settlement for FPIs

The Securities and Exchange Board of India has approved key regulatory changes to provide more flexibility for Alternative Investment Funds during their winding-up process. It introduced a framework to classify funds as "inoperative" to ease their compliance burden and permitted the retention of liquidation proceeds under specific conditions. In a significant move for global investors, SEBI approved net settlement of funds for Foreign Portfolio Investors in the cash market to reduce transaction costs. The board also drastically reduced the minimum investment for Social Impact Funds and overhauled ethics and "fit and proper" criteria for market intermediaries and its own top officials.

Key Points: SEBI Eases AIF Rules, Approves FPI Net Settlement

  • Flexible AIF winding-up & inoperative fund tagging
  • Net settlement for FPI cash market trades
  • Social Impact Fund min. investment cut to ₹1,000
  • Revised "fit and proper" criteria for intermediaries
  • New ethics rules for SEBI top officials
3 min read

SEBI eases AIF winding-up rules, approves net settlement for FPI transactions

SEBI approves new rules for AIF winding-up, net settlement for FPIs, and lower investment limits for Social Impact Funds to boost market efficiency.

"reduce the compliance burden on AIFs with no active fund management activity - SEBI Board"

New Delhi, March 23

The Securities and Exchange Board of India on Monday approved a series of regulatory amendments designed to provide Alternative Investment Funds with greater flexibility during the winding-up process and to reduce the compliance burden on funds that are no longer actively managed.

The proposed solutions include permitting the retention of liquidation proceeds under specific conditions, such as pending litigation or tax demands, and introducing a framework to tag certain entities as inoperative funds to exempt them from standard reporting requirements.

The decisions were detailed by SEBI Chairperson Tuhin Kanta Pandey during an address following the 213th board meeting held in Mumbai on Monday. Under the new framework, AIFs can retain proceeds beyond their permissible fund life if they can show "demonstrable receipt of a litigation notice or tax/regulatory demand" or if they secure "consent of at least 75% of investors by value" to satisfy anticipated liabilities.

For operational expenses, retention is permitted for up to three years, provided the amounts are substantiated by prior-year comparables or invoices.

The Chairperson noted that funds intending to surrender their registration while holding such residual proceeds will be categorized as "inoperative funds." This classification allows for the "discontinuation of periodic filings, PPM updation, and performance benchmarking," significantly easing the administrative weight on entities that are effectively in a terminal phase.

The board emphasized that these measures are expected to "reduce the compliance burden on AIFs with no active fund management activity while retaining necessary regulatory oversight."

In a move to lower transaction costs for global investors, the regulator also approved the net settlement of funds for Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPIs) in the cash market. Currently, FPIs settle on a gross basis, which often leads to "additional costs for FPIs, including funding costs and foreign exchange slippages."

By allowing netting for outright transactions, SEBI expects to improve operational efficiency, particularly during index rebalancing. However, the regulator clarified that the "settlement of securities shall continue to be carried out on a gross basis" to allay concerns regarding speculative trading or large market positions. This system is expected to be fully implemented by December 31, 2026.

Furthering its agenda on financial inclusion, the board reduced the minimum investment for individuals in Social Impact Funds from Rs 2 lakh to Rs 1,000. This change is intended to "facilitate wider retail participation on Social Stock Exchange" by aligning application sizes with other social instruments.

Additionally, the board overhauled the "fit and proper" criteria for market intermediaries, deciding that a criminal complaint or FIR "shall, by itself, not be ground for automatic disqualification," moving instead toward a case-by-case principle-based assessment.

The board also moved to strengthen internal ethics by bringing the Chairperson and Whole-Time Members under the definition of "insider" and mandating the disclosure of immovable property details.

These officials will now be required to either liquidate, freeze, or sell their personal equity investments via a trading plan upon joining the regulator.

A new Office of Ethics and Compliance will be established to oversee these conflict-of-interest frameworks and foster a culture of ethical conduct across the organization.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Reducing the minimum investment in Social Impact Funds to just ₹1,000 is a game-changer! Finally, middle-class families like mine can participate meaningfully in impact investing. This will truly democratize finance for social good.
R
Rohit P
Net settlement for FPIs is long overdue. The foreign exchange slippage costs were eating into returns. This should make India a more attractive destination for global capital, especially with index rebalancing. Good step for market efficiency.
S
Sarah B
While most changes are positive, I have a respectful criticism. The "fit and proper" criteria change is worrying. A case-by-case assessment for criminal complaints sounds good on paper, but could it lead to subjective interpretations? We need strong safeguards to prevent misuse.
V
Vikram M
The new Office of Ethics and Compliance is a crucial move. Bringing the Chairperson and members under the 'insider' definition and mandating property disclosure shows SEBI is serious about walking the talk. Trust in the regulator is key for market integrity.
K
Kavya N
As a CA, I see the "inoperative funds" classification as a major relief for compliance costs. So much time and money was wasted on filings for funds that were essentially dormant. This is a practical solution that reduces red tape without compromising oversight.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50