SC stays CAG audit of Delhi power discoms, orders status quo till July 15
New Delhi, July 3
The Supreme Court on Friday stayed the proposed audit of Delhi power distribution companies by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India and directed that status quo be maintained till July 15, when the matter will be heard next.
A bench of Justices KV Viswanathan and Shree Chandrashekhar also issued notice on an appeal filed by the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission (DERC) challenging an April order of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) on the issue of auditing power distribution companies.
The top court stayed the operation of APTEL's order, which had held that DERC could not entrust the audit to the CAG and had instead directed the regulator to appoint an independent Chartered Accountant to conduct the exercise.
Appearing for DERC, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta submitted that the audit contemplated by the Supreme Court's August 6, 2025 judgment had to be completed before any recovery of regulatory assets could be made from electricity consumers. He argued that the audit formed an integral part of the mechanism laid down by the apex court.
Senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for the power distribution companies, contended that the issue of audit was distinct from the recovery of regulatory assets and that the present appeals were confined to deciding the authority that should conduct the audit.
After hearing both sides, the bench observed that the submissions required an interpretation of its August 6, 2025 judgment. It listed the matter for hearing on July 15 and directed that it be placed before the Chief Justice of India for assignment to an appropriate bench.
The August 2025 judgment arose from a batch of cases concerning tariff orders issued by DERC between 2011 and 2014. While noting the significant accumulation of regulatory assets across the country, the Supreme Court had held that indefinite deferment of such liabilities distorted tariff-setting and unfairly shifted the burden to future consumers.
The court had directed electricity regulators to maintain cost-reflective tariffs, liquidate accumulated regulatory assets within prescribed timelines and conduct a strict audit into the reasons for their continued accumulation, with APTEL overseeing compliance under Section 121 of the Electricity Act. However, the judgment did not specify which authority should conduct the audit.
Following the judgment, the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi approved a proposal on March 5, 2026, for the audit to be conducted by the CAG. The decision was challenged before APTEL, which set aside the proposal and directed DERC to appoint an independent Chartered Accountant instead.
— ANI
Reader Comments
I'm just tired of these legal battles between DERC and discoms while we consumers keep getting higher bills every summer. SC asking for a status quo is understandable, but the delay just means more confusion. We need a strong, independent audit - whether it's CAG or someone else, just get it done without more litigation.
CAG audit would have been cleaner and more thorough for sure. But the Supreme Court should also look at why regulatory assets have piled up so much in the first place - 2011 to 2014 tariff orders are still causing issues? That's a decade of mismanagement and passing costs to people. Ye kya chal raha hai? 😡
I understand the discoms' argument that audit and regulatory asset recovery are separate issues. But at the end of the day, the consumer should not be burdened for systemic inefficiencies. An independent audit by CAG with proper oversight would bring much-needed transparency. Let the court decide what's best for all stakeholders, not just the companies.
The discoms are essentially trying to avoid a CAG audit because it will expose the inefficiencies that have been hidden for years. If they really had nothing to hide, they'd welcome the CAG. Instead, they want a CA who might be more flexible with the findings. Ab logon ki bijli ka bill kaise kam hoga? Very frustrating. 😐
Good that SC is taking time to interpret its own judgment properly. The August 2025 order was clear about the
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.