SC Takes Up PIL Against Housing Societies Blocking EV Charger Installations

The Supreme Court has issued notice on a Public Interest Litigation challenging the arbitrary denial of No Objection Certificates by housing societies for the installation of private electric vehicle chargers. The petition, filed by a Greater Noida resident, argues such refusals defeat national EV policy and violate fundamental rights. It highlights that despite central guidelines expressly permitting such installations, societies like Nirala Estate create obstacles with insufficient public charging points. The court has sought responses from the Union government, Uttar Pradesh, and the concerned housing society.

Key Points: SC Notice on PIL Over Housing Societies Denying EV Charger NOCs

  • SC to examine arbitrary NOC denials for EV chargers
  • Petition cites violation of national clean mobility policy
  • Highlights insufficient charging points in large societies
  • Seeks enforcement of 2024 central EV guidelines
3 min read

SC issues notice on PIL over arbitrary denial of EV charger NOCs by housing societies

Supreme Court issues notice on a PIL challenging arbitrary denial of NOCs for EV chargers by housing societies, seeking enforcement of central guidelines.

"The principal obstacle to EV adoption at the residential level is the unreasonable refusal or delay by housing societies - Petition"

New Delhi, Feb 24

The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to examine a public interest litigation seeking effective implementation of the Centre's electric vehicle charging infrastructure guidelines and to prevent arbitrary denial of NOCs by housing societies.

Issuing notice on a plea filed by a Greater Noida-based resident, a bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi sought responses from the Union of India, the State of Uttar Pradesh, the Nirala Estate housing society in Greater Noida, and its property management agency Cushman & Wakefield Property Management Services India Pvt Ltd.

The petition has been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution by Rachit Katyal, who contended that despite clear Central government guidelines promoting EV adoption, housing societies continue to obstruct the installation of private charging infrastructure.

According to the plea, the petitioner is the owner and resident of a flat in Greater Noida (West) Nirala Estate Phase-3 and had purchased an electric vehicle in furtherance of "the increasing need for sustainable and eco-friendly transportation and national EV policies".

The plea stated that the petitioner planned the installation of a certified private EV charger at his own expense through authorised professionals, and sought a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the housing society and management agency on May 26, 2025.

However, despite repeated reminders and submission of government guidelines, no decision was taken.

The petition, filed through advocate Sriram Parakkat, contended that arbitrary refusal by housing societies to grant NOCs for installation of EV chargers in designated parking spaces defeats national policy on clean mobility and violates residents' fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 21.

"The principal obstacle to EV adoption at the residential level is the unreasonable refusal or delay by housing societies in granting permission for installation of EV chargers in allotted parking spaces," it added.

The petitioner alleged that although the society has nearly 4,000 flats and around 56 electric vehicles, only two low-capacity charging points of 7 kW and 3 kW exist, which are "grossly insufficient and contrary to national EV policy".

Referring to the Union Ministry of Power's notification dated September 17, 2024, the plea said the consolidated "Guidelines for Installation and Operation of Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure-2024" expressly permit residents of group housing societies to install private EV chargers in their designated parking spaces, subject to safety norms.

"The said EV Guidelines expressly promote installation of private EV chargers in group housing societies and provide for electricity supply through existing meters or sub-meters, leaving no scope for arbitrary denial by housing societies," the petition stated.

"Denial of permission by housing societies frustrates national policy, violates principles of reasonableness and non-arbitrariness, and undermines public interest in sustainable development," it added.

Relying on policies adopted in states such as Maharashtra, where statutory circulars mandate issuance of NOCs within stipulated timelines, the petitioner argued that the absence of enforceable directions in Uttar Pradesh has resulted in regulatory uncertainty and inconsistent implementation of Central guidelines. Stating that the cause of action is "continuous and subsisting", the petition seeks directions to ensure uniform and effective implementation of the 2024 EV charging infrastructure guidelines and to prevent arbitrary denial of NOCs by housing societies.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
While I support EV adoption, I can also see the society's side. Our building is old, and the electrical infrastructure can't handle multiple high-power chargers without a major upgrade. Who will pay for that? The government makes policies but doesn't provide funds for societies to retrofit old wiring. The SC should also look into practical solutions and funding, not just issue notices.
A
Aman W
Finally! This arbitrary power of housing society secretaries and committees needs to be checked. They act like local zamindars sometimes. If the Ministry of Power has issued clear guidelines, what right do they have to sit on the application? The UP government should follow Maharashtra's example and make timelines mandatory. Jai Hind to the petitioner from Greater Noida!
S
Sarah B
As an expat living in Gurgaon, this is a familiar story. The bureaucracy at every level, even in residential societies, is a huge barrier to progress. The national EV policy is ambitious, but these small, everyday obstacles make it so hard for ordinary people to participate. The Supreme Court taking it up sends a strong signal that citizen rights matter in the green transition.
K
Karthik V
The data point says it all: 4000 flats, 56 EVs, and only TWO charging points? That's laughable and shows complete apathy. Societies are quick to collect maintenance charges but slow to provide basic modern amenities. Hope the SC ruling sets a precedent for the entire country. We bought an EV last year and had to fight for 6 months to get permission. The struggle is real.
N
Nikhil C

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50