Supreme Court Denies Vedanta's Plea to Halt Adani's JP Associates Takeover

The Supreme Court declined Vedanta Group's request to stay the implementation of Adani Enterprises' resolution plan for Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. The bench noted the matter is already listed for final hearing before the NCLAT on April 10th and saw no reason to intervene at this stage. Vedanta had challenged the plan, arguing it submitted a higher financial offer and that the process lacked transparency. The lenders defended their choice, citing Adani's higher upfront cash payment and shorter repayment schedule as key deciding factors.

Key Points: SC Declines Stay on Adani's Jaiprakash Associates Resolution Plan

  • SC refuses stay on Adani's resolution plan
  • Vedanta claimed higher bid of Rs 16,726 crore
  • Lenders favored Adani's upfront cash & shorter timeline
  • NCLAT to hear final appeals on April 10
3 min read

In setback to Vedanta, SC declines to stay Adani resolution plan for Jaiprakash Associates

Supreme Court refuses Vedanta's plea to halt Adani's Rs 14,500-crore takeover of debt-ridden Jaiprakash Associates, directs NCLAT for speedy hearing.

"In view of the fact that company appeals are now listed for final hearing before NCLAT on April 10, we see no reason to interfere. - Supreme Court Bench"

New Delhi, April 6

In a setback to Vedanta Group, the Supreme Court on Monday declined to stay the implementation of Adani Enterprises' resolution plan for debt-ridden Jaiprakash Associates Ltd.

A bench, led by Chief Justice (CJI) Surya Kant, noted that the insolvency proceedings are already listed for final hearing before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) on April 10, and therefore found no reason to intervene at this stage.

"In view of the fact that company appeals are now listed for final hearing before NCLAT on April 10, we see no reason to interfere," the bench, also comprising Justice Joymalya Bagchi, observed, while directing the appellate tribunal to take up the matter on an out-of-turn basis and continue hearings, if necessary, on the next working day.

The apex court further directed that any major policy decision by the monitoring committee in the interim will be taken only after seeking leave of the NCLAT, given the nature and implications of the case.

Vedanta had approached the top court seeking a stay on Adani Enterprises' Rs 14,500-crore resolution plan, contending that the insolvency process lacked transparency and failed to maximise value for creditors.

The company argued that it had submitted a higher offer of Rs 16,726 crore and was initially declared the highest bidder before the outcome was allegedly reversed without adequate explanation.

It also questioned the decision-making process of the Committee of Creditors, describing the approval of Adani Enterprises' plan as "unfair, opaque, and inequitable".

However, the lenders defended their decision, arguing that resolution plans under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) are not determined solely by the highest financial offer. Factors such as upfront cash component, feasibility of execution, and repayment timelines are also taken into account.

According to them, Adani Enterprises' proposal was preferred due to a higher upfront payment of around Rs 6,000 crore and a shorter repayment schedule of about two years.

They further contended that Vedanta's revised bid was submitted after the close of the bidding window and could not be considered without restarting the process.

Earlier, the NCLAT had declined to grant interim relief against the approval of Adani Enterprises' resolution plan by the National Company Law Tribunal, allowing the insolvency process to continue while seeking responses from stakeholders.

Jaiprakash Associates Limited is undergoing insolvency proceedings under the IBC, 2016, following defaults on loans amounting to over Rs 57,000 crore. The company has diversified business interests spanning real estate, cement, power, and infrastructure, with key assets including large township projects in Noida and Greater Noida, as well as investments in expressway and power ventures.

The proposed acquisition by Adani Group entities had earlier received approval from the Competition Commission of India (CCI), as required under the Competition Act, 2002, for such combinations.

Senior advocates Kapil Sibal and V.V. Giri appeared for Vedanta Ltd., while Solicitor General Tushar Mehta represented the Committee of Creditors (CoC). Adani Enterprises was represented by senior advocates Mukul Rohatgi and Ritin Rai, assisted by a team from Karanjawala & Co.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
Vedanta's argument about a higher bid is compelling, but if they submitted it after the deadline, the rules are clear. You can't change the goalposts after the game has started. Transparency is key, but so is adhering to the timeline.
A
Ananya R
Rs 6000 crore upfront cash from Adani vs a higher total bid from Vedanta? Lenders have a point. In today's economy, immediate liquidity is sometimes more valuable than a bigger promise. Hope this resolution helps complete those Noida projects for homebuyers.
V
Vikram M
Another big corporate deal. Hope the common creditors and small vendors get their dues cleared soon. That's the real test of the IBC's success.
K
Karthik V
With all due respect to the courts and process, Vedanta raises a fair concern about opacity. If the highest bidder status was reversed, a clear, public explanation is owed. It builds trust in the system. The IBC is a great law, but its execution must be beyond reproach.
P
Priya S
Adani Group seems to be on an acquisition spree across sectors. Hope this brings stability to JP Associates. Their cement and infrastructure assets are crucial. Let's see how this plays out on April 10th at NCLAT.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50