OpenAI Replaces Anthropic in Pentagon Deal After Trump Ban Over AI Safety Clash

OpenAI has announced an agreement with the US Department of War to deploy its AI models within classified military networks, with CEO Sam Altman emphasizing built-in prohibitions on mass surveillance. The deal comes after President Donald Trump ordered all federal agencies to stop using technology from rival firm Anthropic, accusing it of interfering with military operations. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth launched a fierce attack on Anthropic and its CEO, designating the company a national security supply-chain risk. The Department of War will have a six-month transition period to move away from Anthropic's services.

Key Points: OpenAI Strikes Pentagon Deal After Trump Bans Anthropic AI

  • OpenAI secures Pentagon AI deal
  • Trump bans federal use of Anthropic
  • Clash over surveillance and military access
  • Anthropic designated a national security risk
  • Six-month transition period ordered
5 min read

Sam Altman's Open AI says 'yes' to US Dept of War after it stops use of Anthropic AI

Sam Altman's OpenAI agrees to deploy AI models for the US Department of War after President Trump bans rival Anthropic over a surveillance dispute.

"Two of our most important safety principles are prohibitions on domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility for the use of force. - Sam Altman"

Washington DC, February 28

Open AI on Friday announced that it had reached an agreement with the US Department of War to deploy some of its models in their classified network.

Open AI CEO Sam Altman posted the announcement on X claiming that the agreement has clauses that enforce prohibition on mass surveillance. The issue of surveillance was the breaking point that forced the US Department of War to cancel its agreement with Open AI's bitter rival Anthropic.

"Tonight, we reached an agreement with the Department of War to deploy our models in their classified network. In all of our interactions, the DoW displayed a deep respect for safety and a desire to partner to achieve the best possible outcome. AI safety and wide distribution of benefits are the core of our mission. Two of our most important safety principles are prohibitions on domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility for the use of force, including for autonomous weapon systems. The DoW agrees with these principles, reflects them in law and policy, and we put them into our agreement," Altman said in his post.

"We also will build technical safeguards to ensure our models behave as they should, which the DoW also wanted. We will deploy FDEs to help with our models and to ensure their safety, we will deploy on cloud networks only. We are asking the DoW to offer these same terms to all AI companies, which in our opinion we think everyone should be willing to accept. We have expressed our strong desire to see things de-escalate away from legal and governmental actions and towards reasonable agreements. We remain committed to serve all of humanity as best we can. The world is a complicated, messy, and sometimes dangerous place," he said.

Earlier, US President Donald Trump ordered all federal agencies to immediately stop using Anthropic technology amid a growing dispute between the AI company and the Pentagon. He accused the firm of trying to interfere with how the US military operates and threatening further action if it does not cooperate during a six-month phase-out period.

Secretary of War Pete Hegseth also launched into a diatribe on Anthropic boss Dario Amodei and accused him of engaging in dupilicty

"This week, Anthropic delivered a master class in arrogance and betrayal as well as a textbook case of how not to do business with the United States Government or the Pentagon. Our position has never wavered and will never waver: the Department of War must have full, unrestricted access to Anthropic's models for every LAWFUL purpose in defense of the Republic. Instead, Anthropic AI and its CEO Dario Amodei have chosen duplicity. Cloaked in the sanctimonious rhetoric of "effective altruism," they have attempted to strong-arm the United States military into submission - a cowardly act of corporate virtue-signaling that places Silicon Valley ideology above American lives," Hegseth posted on X.

"The Terms of Service of Anthropic's defective altruism will never outweigh the safety, the readiness, or the lives of American troops on the battlefield. Their true objective is unmistakable: to seize veto power over the operational decisions of the United States military. That is unacceptable. As President Trump stated on Truth Social, the Commander-in-Chief and the American people alone will determine the destiny of our armed forces, not unelected tech executives. Anthropic's stance is fundamentally incompatible with American principles," he added.

"Their relationship with the United States Armed Forces and the Federal Government has therefore been permanently altered. In conjunction with the President's directive for the Federal Government to cease all use of Anthropic's technology, I am directing the Department of War to designate Anthropic a Supply-Chain Risk to National Security. Effective immediately, no contractor, supplier, or partner that does business with the United States military may conduct any commercial activity with Anthropic. Anthropic will continue to provide the Department of War its services for a period of no more than six months to allow for a seamless transition to a better and more patriotic service. America's warfighters will never be held hostage by the ideological whims of Big Tech. This decision is final," he further said.

The DOW's remarks come after Amodei, in a statement on Thursday, said that the firm would not support certain uses of AI, including mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons, citing concerns about democratic values and the current reliability of frontier AI systems.

Amodei stated that despite pressure from the DOW to agree to "any lawful use" of its technology and remove specific safeguards, the company would not change its position.

"The Department of War has stated they will only contract with AI companies who accede to "any lawful use" and remove safeguards in the cases mentioned above. They have threatened to remove us from their systems if we maintain these safeguards; they have also threatened to designate us a "supply chain risk"--a label reserved for US adversaries, never before applied to an American company--and to invoke the Defense Production Act to force the safeguards' removal. These latter two threats are inherently contradictory: one labels us a security risk; the other labels Claude as essential to national security," the statement read.

With Altman's Open AI now stepping in where Anthropic was, it signals yet another chapter in the bitter standoff between two of the World's top Artificial Intelligence companies.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Respect to Anthropic for sticking to their principles, even if it cost them the biggest contract. It takes guts to say no to the US War Department. OpenAI saying yes so quickly feels opportunistic. 🤔 The "technical safeguards" they mention better be ironclad.
A
Aditya G
From an Indian security perspective, this is fascinating. The US is aggressively integrating AI into its war machine. Our DRDO and armed forces need to watch this closely and accelerate our own indigenous AI capabilities for defence. Can't afford to be left behind.
S
Sarah B
The language from Secretary Hegseth is incredibly aggressive – "supply-chain risk", "betrayal", "cowardly act". It shows how much the US government views advanced AI as a sovereign capability, not just a tool. This is about control, plain and simple.
K
Karthik V
The whole debate about "autonomous weapons" is the most critical part. Once that genie is out of the bottle, there's no putting it back. OpenAI says "human responsibility for use of force" is in the agreement. Let's hope they enforce it and it's not just lip service.
M
Meera T
As an Indian tech professional, this corporate drama is intense! But it distracts from the core issue: the militarization of AI is happening at breakneck speed. The world needs a global framework, like we have for nuclear tech, before it's too late. 🇮🇳

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50