NewKerala.com

Hajj 2026 Airfare Hike: Rijiju Defends Rs 10,000 Increase Against Owaisi's Charge

Union Minister Kiren Rijiju defended the Rs 10,000 hike in Hajj airfare, attributing it to global aviation fuel price increases due to geopolitical tensions. He rejected AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi's charge of exploitation, stating the government negotiated to restrict the increase to just $100 per pilgrim. Rijiju emphasized the decision was necessary to ensure seamless operations for Hajj 2026 and protect pilgrims from a far larger burden. The Ministry asserted its commitment to making Hajj accessible and affordable for every Muslim.

Key Points: Hajj Airfare Hike: Rijiju Rejects Owaisi's Exploitation Charge

  • Rijiju defends Rs 10,000 Hajj airfare hike citing global fuel price rise
  • Owaisi accuses Centre of exploitation, demands rollback
  • Govt says increase restricted to $100, saving pilgrims $200-$300
  • Decision aims to ensure smooth Hajj 2026 for one lakh pilgrims
3 min read

Restricted hike to ensure seamless operation of Hajj: Rijiju rejects Owaisi's 'exploitation' charge​

Kiren Rijiju defends Rs 10,000 Hajj airfare hike, citing global fuel price rise. Rejects Asaduddin Owaisi's exploitation charge, says minimal increase ensures smooth operations.

"We also can't blame Airlines for the rise in Aviation Turbine Fuel price. - Kiren Rijiju"

New Delhi, April 30

Union Ministry of Minority Affairs Kiren Rijiju on Thursday sought to pacify the Hajj pilgrims, upset over the proposed Rs 10,000 hike in airfare, by explaining the 'distressing and gloomy' situation for airline operations in general, in light of the West Asia war and informed that the "minimal increase" was being put in place to ensure smooth and comfortable operation of Hajj 2026.​

His clarification over the Rs 10,000 spike in airfares per pilgrim comes as a rebuttal to AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi's charge, who accused the Centre of exploitation and demanded immediate rollback of the decision.​

Kiren Rijiju said that aviation turbine fuel prices have jacked up globally due to ongoing geopolitical tensions, and that it was at the government's insistence that airlines agreed to a $100 increase, despite demands for a steep rise of $300-$400 per pilgrim.​

Taking to X handle, he wrote, "We also can't blame Airlines for the rise in Aviation Turbine Fuel price. Through negotiations, we ensured the increase was restricted to just $100, saving each pilgrim a significant amount."​

Acknowledging Hajj as a once-in-a-lifetime dream and opportunity for the Muslim community, the Union Minister said that the decision for a 'minimal hike' was agreed upon to ensure that Hajj 2026 doesn't face any disruptions.​

Earlier, AIMIM chief took strong exception to the introduction of a Rs 10,000 differential airfare for every pilgrim and urged the Minority Affairs minister to withdraw the circular that asked Hajj pilgrims to pay an additional Rs 10,000 in view of the crisis in the Gulf region.​

"Are pilgrims being punished for going through the Hajj Committee? This is just exploitation and nothing else. Most pilgrims are not wealthy; they save money for years to afford the Hajj. This is not a luxury for them. The circular must be withdrawn immediately, and the pilgrims must be refunded the money taken from them," Owaisi asked on X earlier in the day.​

The Ministry of Minority Affairs also sought to address the grievances of pilgrims by highlighting "grim realities" of the current times and stated that this decision will only add to the savings of pilgrims.​

"The Union Ministry approved a one-time revision of only USD $100 per pilgrim, irrespective of embarkation point - a saving of $200-$300 per pilgrim compared to what airlines originally sought. This is not exploitation. This is the government absorbing pressure and protecting pilgrims from a far larger burden," it said while asserting that the decision was taken in good faith to ensure that the planned pilgrimage of one lakh registered pilgrims doesn't get affected or disrupted in between.​

"We remain committed to making Hajj accessible and affordable for every Muslim," it added.​

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
As someone whose family has done Hajj, I know how sacred this journey is. But I'm tired of politicians from both sides playing games. Owaisi calls it 'exploitation' without acknowledging global realities, and Rijiju sounds defensive. The truth is, ₹10,000 is a lot for a poor family saving for decades. Why can't they offer a payment plan or partial waiver for BPL pilgrims? 😔
V
Vikram M
Honestly, this seems like a reasonable compromise. Airlines wanted $300-400 more, government negotiated down to $100. That's good governance. But Owaisi's job is to represent the pilgrims' frustration—and he's right that every rupee matters. The real question is: why can't India negotiate better fuel deals for Hajj flights given the volume? Something to think about.
A
Ananya R
I'm a Hindu but I respect the Hajj journey deeply—it requires immense sacrifice. Rs 10,000 extra is not a small amount for daily-wage workers or small shopkeepers who save for years. While I understand global fuel prices, the government should have absorbed this cost instead of passing it to pilgrims. After all, it's about ensuring religious freedom and dignity. 🙏
J
James A
Interesting to see this debate from an Indian perspective. In many Western countries, any airline surcharge due to geopolitical issues is passed directly to passengers. The fact that the Indian government negotiated a lower increase and is explaining it publicly shows more transparency than most governments. Still, for pilgrims saving for a lifetime, every rupee counts.
R
Rohit P
Both

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50