Trump: Iran Deal Hinges on "No Nuclear Weapon" and Uranium Handover

US President Donald Trump has declared that any resolution to the conflict with Iran is strictly contingent on the complete removal of nuclear threats, specifically demanding "no nuclear weapon." He revealed the US is negotiating with a high-level Iranian figure—excluding Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei—and intends to take possession of Iran's highly enriched uranium as part of a settlement. Trump suggested the Strait of Hormuz could soon be "jointly controlled" and established a five-day window for diplomatic progress, warning of continued military action otherwise. He downplayed the impact of easing some oil sanctions, arguing any revenue to Tehran would be negligible.

Key Points: Trump Sets Terms for Iran Conflict Resolution

  • Nuclear threat removal is mandatory
  • US to take Iran's enriched uranium
  • Talks with a "top" Iranian, not Khamenei
  • Strait of Hormuz may be jointly controlled
  • Five-day diplomatic window set
4 min read

Resolution to Iran conflict contingent on removal of nuclear threats, says Trump

President Trump says ending the Iran conflict requires removing nuclear threats, taking enriched uranium, and hints at internal regime talks.

"We want to see no nuclear bomb, no nuclear weapon. - Donald Trump"

Florida, March 23

US President Donald Trump has underscored that any potential resolution to the ongoing conflict with Tehran remains strictly contingent on the complete removal of nuclear threats.

Emphasising the core requirements for a diplomatic breakthrough, the President told reporters in Florida, "We want to see no nuclear bomb, no nuclear weapon."

He further indicated that the United States intends to take possession of Iran's highly enriched uranium as part of a final settlement. Referring to the material as "the nuclear dust," Trump asserted, "We're gonna want that. And I think we're gonna get that. We've agreed to that."

The President revealed on Monday that the US is currently in negotiations with a "top person" within the Iranian regime to conclude the war. However, he clarified that these high-level discussions do not involve the new Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei.

When pressed by reporters on who the US is engaging with, Trump described the contact as "a top person," noting the significant attrition within Iran's traditional hierarchy.

"Don't forget: We've wiped out the leadership phase one, phase two and largely phase three. But we're dealing with a man who I believe is the most respected and the leader, you know it's a little tough, they've wiped out, we've wiped out everybody," Trump remarked.

He added that while Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner have been active in the talks, he would not identify the specific Iranian counterpart.

Regarding the current Supreme Leader, Trump remained dismissive, stating, "No, not the Supreme Leader." He noted that "we have not heard from the son," referring to the younger Khamenei.

"Every once in a while you'll see a statement made, but we don't know if he's living," he said, before adding, "I don't consider him really the leader."

The President suggested that the conflict has essentially triggered a transition of power within the country. "And there'll also be a very serious form of regime change," Trump stated, pointing to early military strikes.

"There's automatically a regime change," he noted, while expressing optimism about his current interlocutors. "But we're dealing with some people that I find to be very reasonable, very solid. The people within know who they are, they're very respected, and maybe one of them will be exactly what we're looking for."

On the economic front, Trump downplayed the significance of easing sanctions on certain Iranian oil stockpiles, framed as a measure to mitigate a worsening global energy crisis.

"I just want to have as much oil in the system as possible," he told reporters, adding that any revenue reaching Tehran would be negligible and would not "have any difference" in the war.

"Any small amount of money that Iran gets won't have any difference in this war. But I want to have the system be lubricated," he argued.

He further questioned the regime's ability to access funds, stating, "We don't even know if Iran gets that money. Frankly, I think it's very hard, very hard for them to get it."

A major breakthrough appears possible regarding the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz, which the President claimed will be "open very soon" if current negotiations maintain their pace.

Trump envisioned a future where the shipping route is "jointly controlled" by the US and Iran. "It'll be jointly controlled," he stated. "Me and the Ayatollah, whoever the Ayatollah is, whoever the next Ayatollah is."

The President confirmed that talks involving his top envoys proceeded late into Sunday evening, identifying "major points of agreement."

Characterising the progress as significant, he said the discussions "went, I would say, perfectly," and added that Iran had initiated the contact.

"I would say that if they carry through with that, it'll end that, that problem, that conflict, and I think it'll end it very, very substantially."

The President established a clear timeframe for the diplomatic effort. "We're doing a five-day period, we'll see how that goes. That if it goes well we're going to end up with settling this. Otherwise, we just keep bombing our little hearts out," he warned, while indicating that further phone calls on Monday would lead to an in-person meeting "very, very soon."

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
This is worrying. Any conflict in the Gulf affects global oil prices directly, and we in India feel the pinch at the petrol pump. A "jointly controlled" Strait of Hormuz sounds unstable. We need stability for our energy security. The US should work with the UN, not just make unilateral demands.
A
Aman W
Trump's approach is all about "America First," but the world needs a collective solution. Just taking Iran's enriched uranium isn't a long-term fix. What about the broader Middle East peace? India has good relations with both the US and Iran; maybe we can play a quiet diplomatic role behind the scenes.
S
Sarah B
The casual remarks about not knowing if the Supreme Leader's son is even living are deeply disrespectful. Even in conflict, basic diplomatic decorum matters. This kind of rhetoric makes a peaceful resolution harder, not easier. The focus should be purely on the nuclear issue.
V
Vikram M
As an Indian, my primary concern is for the large Indian diaspora in the Gulf region and the safety of our energy supplies. A peaceful resolution is paramount. The 5-day ultimatum sounds like pressure tactics. Hope wisdom prevails on all sides. The world doesn't need another war.
K
Karthik V
The goal of a nuclear-free Iran is correct, but the method is questionable. Talking to a "top person" who isn't the Supreme Leader? Sounds like they're trying to create internal splits. This could lead to more chaos in Iran, which is the last thing the region needs. Stability is key for global trade.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50