SC Backs Jharkhand HC, Allows JSSC-CGL Results and Appointments

The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with a Jharkhand High Court order permitting the declaration of results for the JSSC Combined Graduate Level examination. The High Court had allowed appointments to proceed while keeping the results of 10 specific candidates in abeyance pending a Special Investigation Team probe. It rejected petitions seeking a CBI investigation, finding no evidence the SIT probe was tainted. The court concluded there was no proof of a systemic paper leak that would compromise the entire examination.

Key Points: SC Upholds Jharkhand HC Order on JSSC-CGL Results

  • SC dismisses pleas against HC order
  • JSSC can declare results and make appointments
  • Results of 10 candidates withheld pending probe
  • HC rejected demand for CBI investigation
3 min read

'Requires no interference': SC rejects pleas against Jharkhand HC order allowing JSSC-CGL results

Supreme Court refuses to interfere, allowing JSSC to declare CGL results and make appointments, with 10 results withheld pending SIT probe.

"correct and balanced - Supreme Court Bench"

New Delhi, Jan 5

The Supreme Court on Monday refused to interfere with the Jharkhand High Court's decision permitting the declaration of results and the appointment of successful candidates in the Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission's Combined Graduate Level examination.

A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta dismissed the special leave petitions (SLPs) challenging the Jharkhand High Court's order, observing that the ruling was "correct and balanced" and required no interference from the apex court.

The SLPs arose from a decision of the Jharkhand High Court, which had allowed the JSSC to publish the final result of the CGL examination and proceed with appointments, while keeping the results of 10 suspected candidates in abeyance pending completion of investigation by the Special Investigation Team (SIT).

In its detailed judgment passed on December 3, the Jharkhand High Court vacated its earlier stay order and directed the respondent-JSSC to publish the final result.

"The respondent-JSSC is directed to publish the final result of the said examination and the State Government is further directed to appoint the successful candidates on the respective posts," a Bench of Chief Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan and Justice Rajesh Shankar had ordered.

However, the Jharkhand High Court had clarified that out of 28 candidates allegedly taken to Nepal for memorising questions and answers, the results of 10 candidates who qualified would remain withheld till completion of the investigation.

"The final result of the said 10 candidates will be kept in abeyance till the investigation of SIT is completed, and their selection will be subject to the final outcome of the investigation," it had clarified.

The Jharkhand High Court had also rejected the plea seeking a CBI probe, holding that the matter did not warrant transfer of investigation to the Central agency.

"The petitioners have failed to show that the investigation of SIT is tainted and thus we do not find any reason to refer the present matter to CBI for investigation," the Chief Justice Chauhan-led Bench had observed, while directing the Special Investigation Team (SIT) to complete the probe within six months.

The case related to allegations of paper leak in the JSSC-CGL examination held in September 2024.

While acknowledging allegations of malpractice and extortion by certain intermediaries, the Jharkhand High Court had concluded that there was no evidence of a "systemic paper leak" vitiating the entire examination process.

"The petitioners have not been able to show that the sanctity of the said examination was compromised at a systemic level," the Jharkhand High Court had noted, adding that segregation of tainted and untainted candidates was possible.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
This is a sensible verdict. It protects the integrity of the process for the majority while isolating the questionable cases. The SIT has 6 months now, they must deliver a thorough report. Our youth deserve a fair and timely recruitment system. 🙏
A
Aman W
Good decision by SC. But I have a respectful criticism: why only 6 months for SIT? These investigations often drag on for years. There should be a strict timeline with consequences for delays. The future of those 10 candidates is also in limbo.
S
Sarah B
Interesting to see the courts differentiating between systemic failure and individual malpractice. The "Nepal for memorising questions" part is shocking though! Hope the SIT gets to the bottom of this racket. Wishing all the genuine candidates the best for their new roles.
K
Karthik V
A much-needed relief for aspirants. Years of preparation shouldn't go waste because of corruption by a few. The courts have shown wisdom. Now the state government must expedite the appointments without any further bureaucratic delay. Jai Hind!
N
Nisha Z
Taking candidates to Nepal to memorize answers... the lengths these scamsters go to! 😠 Glad the HC didn't order a CBI probe unnecessarily and trusted the SIT. Let's hope this sets a precedent for handling such cases without punishing everyone.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50