NewKerala.com

US Eyes Greenland Acquisition as National Security Priority, Military Option on Table

The White House has declared the acquisition of Greenland a U.S. national security priority, stating all options including military force are being considered to counter Russian and Chinese influence in the Arctic. This stance was communicated by Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, echoing recent remarks by former President Donald Trump. European leaders have issued a joint statement firmly rejecting unilateral action, asserting Arctic security must be collective and that Greenland's future is solely for Denmark and its people to decide. The comments follow Trump's renewed focus on Greenland after military action in Venezuela.

Key Points: US Considers Greenland Acquisition for Arctic Security

  • US cites Arctic security for Greenland interest
  • Military force described as an option
  • European leaders reject unilateral action
  • Trump points to Russian, Chinese presence
  • Greenland's status belongs to its people
2 min read

"Acquiring Greenland a US national priority; utilizing military always an option": WH Press Secretary Leavitt

White House says acquiring Greenland is a national security priority, with military force an option, drawing pushback from European allies.

"acquiring Greenland is a national security priority of the United States - Karoline Leavitt"

Washington DC, January 7

The White House said on Tuesday that it is considering "a range of options" to acquire Greenland, and that the use of military is not off the table, CNN reported, citing Karoline Leavitt on Tuesday.

According to CNN, Leavitt said that the US President has made it well-known that "acquiring Greenland is a national security priority of the United States" and is important to deter the adversaries in the Arctic region.

"President Trump has made it well known that acquiring Greenland is a national security priority of the United States, and it's vital to deter our adversaries in the Arctic region. The President and his team are discussing a range of options to pursue this important foreign policy goal, and of course, utilizing the U.S. Military is always an option at the Commander in Chief's disposal," Karoline Leavitt said in a statement to CNN.

On January 6, European leaders issued a joint statement pushing back against renewed remarks by US President Donald Trump on Greenland, asserting that security in the Arctic must be addressed collectively.

Emphasising a unified security framework, the statement said, "Security in the Arctic must therefore be achieved collectively, in conjunction with NATO allies including the United States, by upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders. These are universal principles, and we will not stop defending them."

The leaders further underscored Greenland's political standing, stating, "Greenland belongs to its people. It is for Denmark and Greenland, and them only, to decide on matters concerning Denmark and Greenland."

The joint statement followed remarks by US President Donald Trump focusing on Greenland after the ousting of Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro.

Earlier, US President Donald Trump once again said that the United States needs Greenland for national security reasons, a day after strikes on Venezuela, which resulted in the capture of Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro.

Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday night, Trump said Greenland was critical to US security due growing presence of Russia and China in the Arctic region.

He said, "We need Greenland. ... It's so strategic right now. Greenland is covered with Russian and Chinese ships all over the place," Trump said. "We need Greenland from the standpoint of national security, and Denmark is not going to be able to do it."

Trump further claimed that Europe supported the idea.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As an observer from India, this is concerning. The world is already dealing with enough conflicts. The Arctic should be a zone of peace and scientific cooperation, not a new chessboard for great power rivalry. The UN Charter principles mentioned by Europe are fundamental.
P
Priya S
The timing is also very telling. Right after the Venezuela operation, the focus shifts to Greenland. It creates an impression of a pattern. Sovereignty and territorial integrity are not just "universal principles" for Europe; they matter to every nation, big or small.
R
Rohit P
While I understand the strategic concerns about Russia and China in the Arctic, the solution cannot be to simply take land. This kind of talk undermines the very international order the US helped create. Hope cooler heads prevail in Washington.
M
Michael C
From a purely strategic perspective, it's a fascinating move. Controlling Greenland would give the US immense advantage in the Arctic. But the method matters. You can't just claim a territory because it's "strategic." The people of Greenland and Denmark must agree.
K
Kavya N
This is a perfect example of why multilateralism is so important. No single country, however powerful, should unilaterally decide the fate of others. The joint European statement is a strong and necessary pushback. Hope other nations voice their support for sovereignty.
V

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50