Retired General: US-Israel Strike on Iran a Military Win, But Regime Change Harder

Retired Lieutenant General Syed Ata Hasnain stated the recent US-Israel military action against Iran represents a significant tactical achievement, particularly in suppressing air defenses. However, he emphasized that achieving actual regime change in Iran is a vastly more complex objective due to the regime's ideological support. Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visited a strike site, framing the operation as a necessary global mission to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran. He accused Iran of targeting civilians while asserting the allied forces target the regime's leadership and infrastructure.

Key Points: Iran-Israel Conflict: Regime Change Complex, Says Retd. Lt Gen Hasnain

  • US-Israel strike called a major military achievement
  • Regime change in Iran is a far more complex goal
  • Iran has decided to push back and escalate
  • Netanyahu frames conflict as global mission to neutralize nuclear threat
4 min read

"Regime change is something bigger:" Lieutenant General (Retd) Syed Ata Hasnain on Iran-Israel conflict

Retd. Lt Gen Syed Ata Hasnain analyzes the Iran-Israel conflict, calling the US-Israel strike a military achievement but warning regime change is a bigger, complex objective.

"Regime change is something bigger... - Lieutenant General Syed Ata Hasnain (Retd.)"

New Delhi, March 3

Retired Lieutenant General Syed Ata Hasnain, while sharing his perspective on the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, asserted that the tremendous military achievement of the US-Israel partnership does not automatically lead to regime change in Iran.

He emphasised that regime change remains a far more complex objective, noting that Iran has already signalled its intent to push back and escalate the situation.

"But it does not lead to regime change. Regime change is something bigger... There is a tremendous amount of ideological support, sentimental and emotive support from the Shia communities around the world and therefore escalation is on, and today is the third day. People may have expected that this war would come to an end, perhaps in a day or two, after the Supreme Leader had been eliminated. But I think Iran has decided to push back and escalate..." said Lieutenant General Syed Ata Hasnain (Retd.).

The retired Lieutenant General, on Monday further contended that the attack on Iran represented a tremendous military achievement for the United States-Israel partnership. He noted that both the USA and Iran executed a total suppression of air defences within Tehran and across the entirety of Iran.

However, the retired Lieutenant General characterised the killing of Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as a significant military achievement for the United States.

"... This war was impending for the last two months. We knew that a buildup was taking place, and anytime a trigger would have brought this war up. After Venezuela, especially, we knew that the Americans had the right technologies for penetration, for intelligence requirements. So a big deception plan was probably in place and they lulled Iran into complacency, and I think the attack was launched thereafter. It was a tremendous military achievement on the part of the United States-Israel Combined in achieving this penetration and carrying out a total suppression of all air defence inside Tehran, or rather all around Iran. So the killing of the Supreme Leader is a big military achievement for the United States," said Lieutenant General Syed Ata Hasnain (Retd.).

Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visited the site of an Iranian missile strike in Beit Shemesh, west of Jerusalem, marking the third day of a massive joint military offensive against the Iranian regime.

Standing amidst the wreckage of the targeted civilian area, the 76-year-old leader framed the ongoing conflict as a global mission alongside the United States to neutralise a nuclear-capable Tehran.

While speaking to reporters here, Netanyahu stated, "This is the third day of Operation Roaring Lion, the operation the Israeli army and the state of Israel set out to, with our great friends, the United States of America and President Trump, to thwart existential threats to Israel and great threats to America and the entire world."

The Prime Minister's visit to the bombarded site was intended to highlight the contrasting military strategies of the two warring sides. He accused the Iranian leadership of deliberately targeting non-combatants, while maintaining that the joint forces were focused on the regime's infrastructure.

"When I stand here in a place that was bombarded by the terrorists in Tehran against innocent civilians, you see the difference. The tyrants of Tehran target civilians. We target the tyrants of Tehran to protect civilians," he said.

Netanyahu further warned that the current "military offensive" was a necessary preventative measure to ensure that Iran's ballistic missile capabilities do not reach a point where they could threaten global humanity with nuclear payloads.

"And if this regime, this terrorist regime of the kind we've never seen in the world, if they get nuclear weapons and the means to deliver them, ballistic missiles, intercontinental ballistic missiles, they will threaten all of humanity," he cautioned.

The Prime Minister reiterated that the Israeli-American alliance is serving a broader humanitarian purpose through Operation Roaring Lion.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
While I understand the strategic analysis, the human cost is terrifying. "Targeting tyrants to protect civilians" sounds noble, but civilians are always the ones who suffer the most in these wars. My heart goes out to the innocent people caught in the middle, both in Iran and Israel.
R
Rohit P
India needs to tread very carefully. We have good relations with both the US and Israel, and also significant energy and connectivity interests with Iran (Chabahar port!). Our diplomacy will be tested. We must call for an immediate ceasefire and dialogue. Jai Hind.
S
Sarah B
The General's insight about the "deception plan" is chilling. It shows how modern warfare is as much about cyber and intelligence as it is about missiles. The US-Israel tech advantage is clear, but as he says, that doesn't guarantee a political outcome.
V
Vikram M
Respectfully, I think the article and the General's analysis focus too much on the tactical win. Killing a leader is one thing, but what next? A power vacuum in Iran could be even more dangerous and unpredictable for the whole region, including our backyard.
K
Karthik V
The nuclear threat angle is being used to justify this. But isn't this exactly the kind of escalation that makes a cornered regime more likely to pursue nukes aggressively? Prevention through aggression is a risky doctrine. Hope our MEA is working overtime on this.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50