Ranveer Singh Mimicry Case Settled in Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court accepted an undertaking by Bollywood actor Ranveer Singh to visit the Chamundeshwari Temple in Mysuru and apologize for mimicking a deity. The actor's counsel submitted a revised affidavit offering an unconditional apology. The complainant, advocate Prashant Methal, confirmed the matter was settled and the court will issue a formal order. The controversy stemmed from Ranveer's remarks at the 55th IFFI in Goa on November 28, 2025.

Key Points: Ranveer Singh Mimicry Row Settled, HC Accepts Apology

  • Karnataka HC accepts Ranveer Singh's apology
  • Actor to visit Chamundeshwari Temple in Mysuru
  • Complaint filed over mimicry at IFFI 2025
  • Court noted actor's "reckless and insensitive" remarks
3 min read

Ranveer Singh mimicry row settled, K'taka HC accepts apology​

Karnataka High Court accepts Ranveer Singh's apology for mimicking a deity. Actor to visit Chamundeshwari Temple in Mysuru to tender apology.

"Forgiveness is a fundamental principle of all religions. - Prashant Methal"

Bengaluru, April 25

The Karnataka High Court on Saturday accepted an undertaking by Bollywood actor Ranveer Singh, known for his role in 'Durandhar', to visit the Chamundeshwari Temple in Mysuru and tender an apology for his mimicry of a deity depicted in the film Kantara Chapter-2.​

Meanwhile, the complainant and advocate Prashant Methal stated in Bengaluru that the matter has been settled and that the court will issue an order in this regard soon.​

The bench, headed by Justice M. Nagaprasanna, accepted Ranveer Singh's undertaking to make amends for his mimicry of the temple deity's depiction in the film.​

The court observed that it would pass a formal order after recording the actor's apology and indicated that it may direct him to visit the temple within four weeks.​

Senior counsel Sajjan Poovayya, appearing for Ranveer Singh, submitted that the actor had filed a revised affidavit offering an unconditional apology.​

He also stated that Ranveer Singh would visit Chamundi Hill and tender his apology for the act of mimicry.​

Speaking to the media at the Bengaluru Police Commissioner's office, the complainant, advocate Prashant Methal, said that the Ranveer Singh case had been settled.​

He said that arguments were heard on the affidavit submitted to the court, which stated that the actor would visit Chamundi Hill in Mysuru "in due course".​

He added that they had raised arguments on what "due course" implies, whether it is 15 days, 30 days, one year, or even 10 years.​

The actor's counsel submitted that, due to security concerns, a specific timeline could not be provided.​

After Durandhar 1 and 2, there appears to be a need for enhanced security.​

Methal said they expressed confidence in the Karnataka Police, who can provide foolproof security when the actor visits.​

He further stated that the bench agreed with this position.​

The affidavit has been filed, stating that he will come soon and apologise before the goddess.​

He added that forgiveness is a fundamental principle of all religions.​

Since he has tendered an apology, no further punishment is necessary.​

He said it is appropriate to end the matter here and that it would not be proper to continue.​

It can be recalled that the controversy, often referred to as the "Kantara mimicry row", arose from an incident during the 55th International Film Festival of India (IFFI) in Goa on November 28, 2025, where Ranveer referred to the sacred Chamundi deity as a "female ghost" and mimicked a scene from the film Kantara Chapter-1.​

A Bengaluru-based advocate, Prashanth Methal, filed a complaint alleging that Ranveer's mimicry of the Panjurli/Guliga Daiva (revered divine spirits in Coastal Karnataka) was crude, derogatory, and blasphemous.​

A First Information Report was registered against Ranveer under Sections 196 (promoting enmity between groups), 299 (outraging religious feelings), and 302 (intentional insult) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.​

The Karnataka High Court, specifically Justice M. Nagaprasanna, pulled up the actor for being "reckless and insensitive" and emphasised that public figures must be responsible, noting that "freedom of expression does not excuse casual or uninformed remarks about matters of faith".​

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sneha F
I'm glad this has been settled amicably. The court's observation about public figures being responsible is spot on. Ranveer made a mistake, he apologized, and now he'll make amends. That's how it should be. No need to drag this on forever. Forgiveness is indeed a core value in our culture.
R
Rohit L
So now actors can mock our gods and get away with a temple visit? What about the hurt sentiments of millions? The court should have been stricter. But at least he's apologizing. Hope this sets a precedent that our faith isn't a joke for Bollywood's entertainment.
P
Priya S
As someone from Karnataka, I appreciate that the court handled this sensitively. The Panjurli/Guliga Daiva are deeply revered here. Ranveer's "female ghost" comment was really offensive. But I'm happy he agreed to visit Chamundi Hill. Maybe this will teach other celebrities to think before they speak 🤔
N
Nikhil C
Many people here don't understand that freedom of expression has limits. What Ranveer did was outright disrespectful. I'm glad the court didn't let him off easily and made him apologize. But the "due course" timeline needs clarity - 4 weeks is reasonable. Let's see if he actually follows through.
T
Tanya I
I think this is a fair resolution. The complainant and the court showed maturity. Ranveer's apology seems genuine, and visiting the temple is a good way to make amends. In our tradition, when you make a mistake, you seek forgiveness. No need for further punishment. Let's move on. 🙏

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50