NewKerala.com

Delhi HC Binds Govt to Due Process in Race Club Land Dispute Case

The Delhi High Court has disposed of a suit concerning a disputed 54-acre property after recording the Central Government's submission that it will not dispossess the Delhi Race Club without following due process of law. Justice Mini Pushkarna directed that the Club cannot be dispossessed based on the existing eviction notice and that any future government action must adhere to legal procedure. The Court clarified it made no ruling on the merits of the case, leaving all rights and contentions of the parties open. The suit and pending applications were disposed of by mutual agreement, cancelling the next scheduled hearing.

Key Points: Delhi HC on Race Club Land: Govt Must Follow Due Process

  • Court records govt's due process assurance
  • Disposes suit over 54-acre land
  • Injunction against dispossession countermanded
  • Future action must follow legal procedure
2 min read

Race Club land dispute: Delhi HC records govt assurance on due process, disposes suit

Delhi High Court disposes suit after recording Centre's assurance it will not dispossess Delhi Race Club without following due legal procedure.

"the government would not dispossess the plaintiff without adhering to due process of law - Ashish K Dixit"

New Delhi, April 11

The Delhi High Court has recorded the Centre's submission that it will not dispossess the Delhi Race Club Ltd. from the disputed land without following due process of law, and held the government bound by this statement while disposing of the suit.

The Court further countermanded the injunction against dispossession from the 54-acre property in the heart of Delhi.

Appearing for the Union of India, Central Government Standing Counsel Ashish K Dixit, on instructions, submitted that the government would not dispossess the plaintiff without adhering to due process of law, as also reflected in the eviction notice dated March 12, 2026.

Taking note of this submission, Justice Mini Pushkarna directed that the plaintiff shall not be dispossessed on the basis of the said eviction notice and clarified that any future action by the government must follow legal procedure.

The Court further observed that if the authorities seek to resume the land, they must initiate proceedings strictly in accordance with the law.

The Court had earlier granted interim protection to the Delhi Race Club on March 25, 2026, noting that a prima facie case was made out, the balance of convenience lay in its favour, and irreparable harm would be caused if protection was denied.

Clarifying that it has not expressed any opinion on the merits, the Court left all rights and contentions of the parties open. With both sides agreeing, the Court disposed of the suit along with pending applications and cancelled the next date of hearing fixed for May 18, 2026.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
54 acres in the heart of Delhi is prime property. While the Race Club has its legacy, one must ask if this is the best use of such valuable public land? Could it be used for a public park, hospital, or affordable housing? Just a thought.
A
Arjun K
The court has balanced things well. Interim protection was given, now they've disposed of the suit after getting a firm assurance from the government. This is how the system should work - methodically and respecting legal procedures. No one is above the law.
S
Sarah B
As an expat living here, it's reassuring to see the judiciary hold the executive accountable. Due process isn't just a phrase; it's the bedrock of a fair society. Hope this sets a precedent for other land disputes across the country.
V
Vikram M
The notice was for 2026? That's two years away! These legal processes take forever. Meanwhile, the land remains underutilized. While I agree due process is important, the system needs to be much faster. Justice delayed is justice denied, yaar.
M
Meera T
Respectfully, I have to disagree with the court's earlier interim order. Granting protection by noting "irreparable harm" to a race club feels disproportionate when so many poor people face eviction with little recourse. The law sometimes feels different for the wealthy.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50