Puducherry has robust governance setup to deliver public goods efficiently: Govt on statehood to Union Territory
New Delhi, March 24
The Ministry of Home Affairs on Tuesday said in Lok Sabha that Puducherry has a robust governance and administrative setup within the existing constitutional and legal framework to deliver public goods efficiently.
In a written reply to a question raised by DMK MP TR Baalu on whether the government has been contemplating to accord full statehood status to Puducherry, Minister of State for Home Nityanand Rai Nityanand Rai said as per Article 239A of the Constitution, Puducherry is a Union Territory with legislature.
"As per Article 239A of the Constitution, Puducherry is a Union Territory with legislature. It has a robust governance and administrative setup within the existing constitutional and legal framework to deliver public goods efficiently," MoS Nityanand Rai said.
Earlier, Rai also clarified that the Central government is not considering any proposal to create a separate ministry, parliamentary inspection committee, or special policy framework exclusively for Union Territories (UTs).
The statement was made in the Lok Sabha in response to a query raised by Independent MP Patel Umeshbhai Babubhai.
In his written reply, Rai stated that the government does not find the need for a dedicated "Ministry or Department of Union Territory Affairs" for managing UTs, nor is there any plan to establish a "Parliamentary Inspection Committee on Union Territories" to monitor their administration.
He also ruled out the possibility of introducing a special policy framework tailored for regions such as Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu, despite their unique geographic and administrative requirements.
— ANI
Reader Comments
As someone from a UT, I have mixed feelings. While central oversight can ensure standards, sometimes local issues need faster, more tailored solutions. A special policy framework for UTs would have been helpful.
Interesting read. The constitutional framework seems clear. But I wonder if the people of Puducherry themselves want statehood? That should be the primary consideration, not just administrative efficiency.
The government's stance is practical. Creating new ministries and committees just adds layers. However, I respectfully disagree on the policy framework part. Places like Daman & Diu have unique needs that a one-size-fits-all approach from Delhi might miss.
Full statehood is a big demand. It's not just about governance but also about identity and autonomy. If the "robust setup" is truly working, fine. But are the local MLAs and the Lt. Governor always in sync? That's often the real issue in UTs with legislatures.
Good decision! We have enough states. Puducherry is small and benefits from central funding and attention. Becoming a state might strain its resources. Let it develop peacefully under the current system. 🙏
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.