Private investment, not West Asia crisis, is India's growth challenge: Surjit Bhalla
New Delhi, May 31
Indian economist and author Surjit Bhalla has said that weak private investment, rather than the ongoing West Asia crisis, is the key factor slowing India's economic growth.
In an exclusive interview with ANI, Bhalla said that India's strong GDP numbers six to eight months ago created a misleading picture of the economy because growth was being driven largely by government spending while private investment remained weak.
"...you said that six, eight months ago, India was shining... But what I'm trying to say is I think that was a misinterpretation of what was going on," Bhalla said.
He noted that most economic indicators appeared healthy at the time. "By all standard measures... GDP growth, it was perfectly fine, that was very good. You look at inflation, very low... So what's the problem? And the problem is that there was very little private investment, or private investment had gone down," he said.
According to Bhalla, GDP growth remained strong mainly because government was investing. However, he argued that government spending is less efficient than private sector investment. "Infrastructure has more corruption, more everything else. So the bang for the buck that you get with government investment is not as good as the bang that you get with private investment," he said.
Bhalla dismissed suggestions that the West Asia crisis, which escalated in February 2026, was responsible for the slowdown. "My analysis and the data stand completely before January of 2026. So the West Asia crisis had nothing to do with my perception and my analysis of the economy," he said.
While acknowledging that the crisis has had some impact, he added, "It's adding, but so it is adding to every country in the world... to me it does not make that much sense to analyse and recommend solutions... based on what is happening post February 26th."
Explaining the lack of private investment, Bhalla said businesses invest where incentives are strongest. "Private sector around the world responds to incentives... The problem was for the private sector... They had more incentive to invest abroad. That's the problem," he said.
He attributed this partly to policy changes introduced after 2015, particularly the bilateral investment treaty framework. "We have made it very difficult for foreign investors to invest in India. Very difficult... We said we'll penalize you if you invest in India by higher taxes and so on and so forth. And you know, that's the problem," Bhalla said.
To revive investment, Bhalla called for restoring the pre-2015 bilateral investment treaty regime, ending retrospective taxation, lowering taxes on foreign investors and supporting export-oriented manufacturing.
"Make it competitive. You want to attract them. We need them," he said.
Bhalla argued that stronger private investment is essential if India wants to raise its growth rate from around 6 per cent to closer to its potential of 8 per cent.
— ANI
Reader Comments
A different perspective: government spending does create jobs and infrastructure that private investment wouldn't touch in the short term. But yes, we need to balance it. The West Asia crisis is a real factor for energy prices though - can't just dismiss it. Overall, a nuanced take from Bhalla ji.
Saar, this is a brilliant analysis! The data clearly shows our GDP was riding on government capex alone. Private sector is sitting on cash but not investing because of policy uncertainty and high taxes. We need to restore confidence. Make in India needs real incentives, not just slogans. 👍
As an American watching India's growth story, this rings true. Our companies have been cautious about India investments due to retrospective tax issues. The 2015 investment treaty changes created real uncertainty. Fixing that would unlock massive capital flows. The West Asia crisis is just an additional headwind, not the main story.
Interesting, but I'm not fully convinced. Private investment has been weak globally, not just in India. And isn't government spending on highways and railways creating long-term assets? The corruption argument is valid, but let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater. Need more detailed data on where private sector is actually investing.
Bhalla sahab has a point about the investment treaty. Remember Vodafone case? That scared away many foreign investors. But also, our domestic private sector is risk-averse right now because of global uncertainty. Government needs to step up in the short
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.