Parliamentary panel flags gaps in BharatNet rollout, seeks state-wise performance audit
New Delhi, August 9
A Parliamentary panel has flagged gaps in the rollout of BharatNet, the government's flagship rural broadband programme, and called for a comprehensive state-wise and implementation model-wise performance audit to identify bottlenecks and ensure connectivity across all Gram Panchayats.
The Standing Committee on Communications and Information Technology, in its 32nd Report on Digital Bharat Nidhi, noted that while substantial infrastructure has been created under BharatNet, the number of operational Gram Panchayats remains below the programme's envisaged universal coverage.
As of February 28, 2026, BharatNet Points of Presence (PoPs) were operational at 78,899 Gram Panchayats out of around 2.64 lakh across the country, according to information provided by the Department of Telecommunications to the Committee. A PoP is essentially a local network point from which broadband connectivity can be extended further to homes, institutions and other users.
"The Committee find that while substantial infrastructure has been created, the number of operational GPs has remained below the envisaged universal coverage and the pace of implementation is uneven across States and models. This indicate gaps in planning, coordination and execution," the panel said.
It called upon the Department to undertake a "comprehensive, model-wise and State-wise performance audit" of BharatNet and identify and address bottlenecks in implementation. The Committee also sought a revised, time-bound roadmap with clear accountability for completing connectivity to all Gram Panchayats.
The Department informed the panel that 7.19 lakh kilometres of optical fibre cable had been laid under the programme as of February 28, 2026. Optical fibre cables form the backbone of the network and are used to transmit internet data over long distances.
It also said Rs 40,635 crore had been disbursed from Digital Bharat Nidhi for BharatNet Phase-I and Phase-II as of February 28. Digital Bharat Nidhi is a dedicated fund used to support expansion of telecom services, particularly in rural and underserved areas.
BharatNet was originally approved by the Union Cabinet as the National Optical Fibre Network in October 2011, with the aim of providing broadband connectivity to all Gram Panchayats. It was subsequently developed as BharatNet and became an important rural connectivity programme under the Digital India initiative. Phase-I was completed in December 2017, while Phase-II was approved in July 2017.
The Committee also raised concerns over the utilisation of the infrastructure already created. The Department said there were 9,48,237 active Fibre-to-the-Home (FTTH) connections under BharatNet as of February 28, all of them in rural areas. FTTH means extending an optical fibre connection directly to homes or other users to provide broadband internet.
The panel said that despite extensive infrastructure and dedicated funding, utilisation remained "sub-optimal when compared to the scale and potential of the network", adding that the benefits of digital connectivity had not fully reached rural and remote areas. It recommended greater focus on increasing FTTH connections and improving use of the existing network.
— ANI
Reader Comments
The gap between laying optical fibre and actually getting FTTH connections to homes is the real story here. 7.19 lakh km of cable is impressive infrastructure, but if only 9.48 lakh rural homes are connected, something is fundamentally broken. I work in telecom and I can tell you the last-mile connectivity is where every project dies in India. The committee is right to demand accountability.
Living in a remote village in Odisha, I can tell you the digital divide is real. Our panchayat has a PoP but no one has trained us how to use it. Kids are still going to cyber cafes 20 km away for online classes. Infrastructure alone won't help—we need digital literacy programmes and affordable devices. But yes, state-wise audit and fixing ground-level coordination is a good start.
I'm a researcher studying digital infrastructure in developing countries. India's BharatNet is an ambitious project, but this report highlights a common pattern: government-funded networks often struggle with last-mile adoption. The uneven state-wise progress suggests some states have better local governance and project management. A thorough audit is necessary, but there also needs to be a shift from just building infrastructure to actively promoting its use through services like telemedicine and online education.
As a teacher in a rural school in Tamil Nadu, the internet connection through BharatNet has been life-changing for our students. But I agree the rollout is patchy—my cousin in Bihar still has no connectivity. The fact that nearly 70% of GPs don't have operational PoPs is concerning. The panel should also check why some states are doing better than others. Maybe those successful models can be replicated elsewhere. Technology should reach every village, not just some.
We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.