Pakistan's Afghan Policy Fuels Regional Instability, Blocks Economic Integration

A report states Pakistan's long-standing policy of seeking a friendly government in Kabul has repeatedly fueled instability in both countries. Tensions dramatically escalated with a Pakistani airstrike in Kabul targeting TTP leader Noor Wali Mehsud. The conflict intensified further as Pakistan declared "open war," targeting both the TTP and Taliban positions across Afghanistan. This instability severely hampers prospects for broader economic integration across South, Central, and West Asia.

Key Points: Pakistan's Afghan Strategy Hurts Regional Stability: Report

  • Pakistan seeks strategic depth vs India
  • Policy fuels instability in both nations
  • Airstrikes in Kabul marked major escalation
  • Open war declared on Taliban regime
3 min read

Pakistan's actions in Afghanistan hamper economic integration in wider region: Report

A report details how Pakistan's policy in Afghanistan, including airstrikes and open war, creates instability and hampers wider economic integration.

"Pakistan's choices will heavily influence whether the country remains trapped in instability or moves toward a more sustainable political settlement. - The National Interest report"

Washington, March 15

Pakistan's Afghanistan policy for decades has revolved around installing a "friendly" government in Kabul -- often through proxy actors such as the Taliban -- in an effort to secure "strategic depth" against India.

However, in practice, the strategy has repeatedly contributed to instability in both Afghanistan and Pakistan while hampering the prospects for broader economic integration across South, Central, and West Asia, a report said on Sunday.

"The deterioration of relations between Islamabad and Kabul raises an important question: What is Pakistan's long-term strategy toward Taliban-ruled Afghanistan? Afghanistan has endured overlapping political, economic, and humanitarian crises since the Taliban seized power in August 2021, and Pakistan's choices will heavily influence whether the country remains trapped in instability or moves toward a more sustainable political settlement," a report in the US-based magazine The National Interest said.

According to the report, the tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan became evident on October 9, 2025, when Pakistani forces launched an unprecedented airstrike in Kabul targeting Noor Wali Mehsud, the leader of the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP).

"Although Mehsud survived, the strike marked a dramatic escalation in Pakistan's willingness to project military force inside Afghanistan. Islamabad had previously targeted TTP positions within provinces of Afghanistan, but striking the capital signalled a new phase in the conflict," it noted.

The report said that the timing of the attack was politically significant as the Taliban's Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi was visiting India during the period.

Also, mediation attempts between Pakistan and Afghanistan by several countries, including Qatar, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia, failed amid deepening mistrust.

The conflict intensified on February 27, when Pakistan announced an "open war" against the Taliban regime.

"Unlike earlier operations that focused primarily on the TTP, Pakistan began targeting both TTP and Taliban positions across multiple provinces of Afghanistan, including Kabul and Kandahar, where the movement's supreme leader, Hibatullah Akhundzada, resides. This shift suggested that Pakistan may no longer view the Taliban merely as an unreliable partner but increasingly as a potential strategic threat," the report added.

The key question, it said, is what Pakistan intends to achieve in Afghanistan -- whether Islamabad is trying "to force behavioural change within the Taliban regime, or has it begun to consider supporting a broader political alternative to Taliban rule".

The report noted that since October 2025, Pakistan's "rhetoric has visibly hardened", with senior Pakistani officials, including military spokesman General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry and Defence Minister Khawaja Asif, adopting a more confrontational tone in public statements, while the country's ultimate strategic objective "remains ambiguous".

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
The economic cost of this instability is staggering. Think of the trade and connectivity projects that could have flourished between South and Central Asia. Instead, we have closed borders and fear. It's a tragedy for development.
P
Priyanka N
The timing of the airstrike when the Taliban FM was in India is very telling. It shows their actions are often reactive and driven by insecurity about India's role. This "open war" announcement is worrying for regional security. Hope our government is prepared for any spillover.
R
Rahul R
Frankly, as an Indian, my primary concern is the security of our borders. Pakistan's chaotic policy creates a vacuum that extremist groups try to fill. We need to stay vigilant and continue our humanitarian outreach to the Afghan people, which is the right thing to do.
A
Aman W
While the report is accurate, I feel it lets other international players off the hook a bit. The US and others also share responsibility for the current mess in Afghanistan. Everyone used it as a chessboard and now ordinary people suffer. The whole region pays the price.
K
Kavya N
Creating monsters and then being afraid of them... that's the story here. The report asks what Pakistan's long-term goal is. I doubt even they know anymore. It's a policy built on paranoia, not progress. So sad for the youth of both countries who just want a normal life.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50