Pakistan Poverty Soars to 43.5%, Urban Crisis Worse Than Official Stats

Poverty in Pakistan has sharply risen to 43.5%, significantly higher than the official estimate of 28.9%. The report reveals urban areas have been disproportionately affected, with poverty increasing more rapidly in cities. The disparity stems from methodological differences in calculating the cost of living and essential needs for low-income households. The findings call for more reliable measurement tools and targeted interventions to address the crisis.

Key Points: Pakistan Poverty Hits 43.5%, Urban Areas Hardest Hit

  • Poverty rate gap of 14.6% vs official stats
  • Urban poverty surged to 42.1%
  • 27 million more fell into poverty since 2019
  • Methodology debate on measuring cost of living
3 min read

Pakistan poverty soars to 43.5%, SPDC says urban areas hit harder than offficial estimates

New report reveals Pakistan's poverty rate at 43.5%, far above official estimates, with 27 million more falling below the line since 2019.

"The caloric approach provides a more accurate reflection of poverty in developing countries - Muhammad Asif Iqbal"

Islamabad, March 29

Poverty in Pakistan has risen sharply to 43.5 per cent, significantly higher than official estimates, according to a report by the country's Social Policy and Development Centre.

As reported by The Express Tribune, the SPDC findings indicate a 14.6 percentage point gap compared to the 28.9 per cent poverty rate estimated by the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS) and the Planning Commission.

The report highlights that urban areas have been disproportionately affected, with poverty increasing more rapidly in cities than in rural regions. National poverty rose from 36.6 per cent in 2018-19 to 43.5 per cent in 2024-25, pushing an estimated 27 million more people below the poverty line during this period, The Express Tribune reported.

Urban poverty increased from 32.1 per cent to 42.1 per cent, while rural poverty rose from 39.3 per cent to 44.3 per cent, the report noted.

According to SPDC, the disparity with official figures stems from differences in methodology. The PBS uses the Cost of Basic Needs approach, which adjusts historical poverty lines using the Consumer Price Index (CPI).

However, the report argues that this method often underestimates the cost of living for low-income households and fails to account for essential expenses such as healthcare and access to clean water, The Express Tribune reported.

In contrast, SPDC employs a Food Energy Intake approach, which links household expenditure to minimum caloric requirements for basic subsistence. The institute estimates separate poverty thresholds based on consumption needs, placing the monthly poverty line for 2024-25 at PKR 13,476 in urban areas and PKR 10,283 in rural areas, compared to the official PKR 8,484.

Citing data from the Household Integrated Economic Survey (HIES) 2024-25, the report also pointed to rising income inequality, with wealth increasingly concentrated among higher-income groups, particularly in urban centres.

SPDC Managing Director Muhammad Asif Iqbal stated that the caloric approach provides a more accurate reflection of poverty in developing countries, as it directly accounts for food consumption patterns and noted that low-income households in Pakistan spend more than half of their income on food, making this method more representative of their realities, The Express Tribune reported.

He further criticised the official methodology, saying it often disconnects poverty estimates from actual economic performance, citing historical trends where poverty appeared to decline despite weak economic growth.

The report concludes that Pakistan is experiencing a broad decline in living standards, particularly in urban areas, and calls for more reliable measurement tools to guide policymaking. It also recommends targeted interventions to address urban poverty, improve access to essential services, and reduce income inequality, ensuring more inclusive economic growth, The Express Tribune reported.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
The methodology debate is crucial. If official stats are underestimating poverty by using old CPI data, how can effective policies be made? SPDC's food energy intake approach seems more grounded in reality. Indian agencies should also ensure our poverty lines reflect actual consumption needs, not just theoretical baskets.
D
David E
As an economist following South Asia, this report highlights a critical issue: the disconnect between growth metrics and lived experience. When half your income goes just to food, you're not living, you're surviving. The concentration of wealth in urban centres is a ticking time bomb for social stability.
A
Aman W
Very sad situation. Pushing 27 million more into poverty in a few years is devastating for any country. It's not just a number, it's families struggling for basics. We should wish for stability and prosperity in the entire region. A peaceful and prosperous neighbourhood benefits everyone. 🙏
S
Swati Y
The point about urban poverty rising faster is interesting. Often we think cities are wealth hubs, but inflation hits the urban poor hardest—rent, transport, utilities. The report's call for targeted urban interventions is key. Hope policymakers listen to independent research like SPDC's and not just comfortable official numbers.
K
Karan T
While the situation is undoubtedly tough, I appreciate that the article and comments are focusing on the human and economic aspect, not politics. Poverty has no religion or nationality. The technical discussion on measurement (CBN vs FEI) is actually very important for accurate diagnosis anywhere, including in India.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50