Sun, 2 Aug 2026 · LIVE
Updated Aug 2, 2026 · 15:15
India News Updated Aug 2, 2026

India Envoy to US Says Pakistan Dismantled Indus Treaty Goodwill, Not Terror

India's Ambassador to the US, Vinay Kwatra, wrote in Newsweek that Pakistan dismantled the goodwill behind the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty through decades of hostility and cross-border terrorism. He cited attacks on the Indian Parliament, Mumbai, Uri, and Pathankot, which killed over 40,000 people, as reasons for India placing the treaty in abeyance. Kwatra argued that Pakistan's water scarcity stems from its own mismanagement, not Indian actions, and urged Pakistan to dismantle terror infrastructure instead of blaming India. He reiterated PM Modi's stance that terror and talks cannot coexist.

Pakistan 'dismantled goodwill' behind Indus Waters Treaty, instead of dismantling terror infrastructure: Indian envoy to US

Washington, Aug 2

India's Ambassador to the US, Vinay Kwatra, has said that the Indus Water Treaty was signed in a spirit of goodwill and friendship in 1960, but Pakistan spent 50 years dismantling this, and its abeyance "merely acknowledges what Pakistan's conduct had already destroyed".

The IWT was signed between India and Pakistan in 1960, concerning the utilisation of the waters of the Indus system rivers. Under the treaty, India received control over the three eastern rivers, which account for roughly 20 per cent of the basin's water, while Pakistan received the water of three western rivers, which carry roughly 80 per cent of the water share.

"That asymmetry stifled development for decades in Indian regions that could have benefited from better water rights. India honoured the treaty anyway," Kwatra, a former Foreign Secretary, wrote in an opinion piece in Newsweek.

However, after last year's heinous Pahalgam terror attack, India exercised its rights as a sovereign nation under international law and placed the IWT in abeyance until Pakistan credibly and irrevocably abjured its support for cross-border terrorism.

The Indian envoy said that Pakistan's approach towards India had been marked by wars, hostility and cross-border terrorist attacks, including on the Indian Parliament, the Mumbai terror attack, the Uri and Pathankot attacks and the Pahalgam attack. More than 40,000 people have been killed in India due to Pakistan's terror campaign, according to Kwatra.

According to Kwatra, Pakistan's approach to India-initiated projects was using obstruction and bureaucratic delays. Repeated targeting of Indian project sites, including the terrorist attack on the Tulbul Navigation Project in 2012, stopped India from exercising its rights under the treaty. Kwatra stated that Pakistan opposed India's initiatives to renegotiate the treaty in view of the technological change, which would have enabled India to build its hydropower potential.

Pakistan "eroded India's faith" that it could exercise its rights under the treaty or hope for a better one considering the current realities of the world, he said, noting that Pakistan was facing water scarcity due to its government's "mismanagement."

In the opinion piece, he said: "It is worth remembering that the treaty's preamble declares it was concluded 'in a spirit of goodwill and friendship.' Pakistan spent half a century dismantling that goodwill and friendship. The abeyance merely acknowledges what Pakistan's conduct had already destroyed."

Responding to calls for India and Pakistan to resume talks, Kwatra said, "Prime Minister Narendra Modi has clearly voiced India's stand today, 'Terror and talks cannot go together... Terror and trade cannot go together.... Water and blood cannot flow together.' Pakistan's aggressive rhetorical incitement, casting India as a 'water aggressor,' betrays the truth that the water scarcity Pakistanis face today is the product of their own government's mismanagement."

Kwatra urged the Pakistan government to fix its dismal water productivity instead of holding conferences for blaming India and issuing threats.

"The habit of pinning every domestic failure on its neighbour has grown old. The world should say so, unequivocally. And, if Pakistan does sincerely want India's cooperation on bilateral issues, it must first dismantle the terror infrastructure that it has built."

— IANS

Reader Comments

Priya S

The ambassador's point about asymmetry is so important. Indian regions like Rajasthan and Punjab could have utilized that water so much better. Yet we honored the treaty religiously. Pakistan calls us 'water aggressors' while their own mismanagement is the real issue. They've built more terror camps than water reservoirs. 🙄

Vikram M

The 2012 Tulbul Navigation Project attack shows Pakistan's true intentions. They didn't want the treaty; they wanted to paralyze our development. Abeyance was the right call after Pahalgam. India has shown incredible restraint all these years. Now it's time for consequences.

Sneha F

I'm glad the government is finally prioritizing national interests over outdated colonial-era agreements. Pakistan has exploited India's goodwill for decades while sponsoring terror. The PM's statement 'Water and blood cannot flow together' should be the foundation of our foreign policy now. Jai Hind! 🇮🇳

James A

As an American reading this, it's eye-opening to see how Pakistan's behavior has affected the region. The Ambassador's statistics about 40,000 casualties are staggering. India's patience has been remarkable. I hope the international community takes note of Pakistan's role in destabilizing the region.

Rohit P

"The habit of pinning every domestic failure on its neighbour has grown old" - absolutely spot on! Pakistan needs to look inward instead of playing victim. Their own government mismanagement and terror economy are the real threats to their water security. India should not be their scapegoat anymore. 💯

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked