Army Chief Reveals Multi-Domain Synergy Secrets of Operation Sindoor

Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi highlighted the integrated success of Operation Sindoor, where intelligence from ground networks, cyber, and electronic warfare enabled precise joint Army-Air Force targeting. He explained that the operation's effectiveness stemmed from different military domains creating conditions for each other, rather than any single service acting alone. The General also noted challenges, such as difficulties in drone Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) due to effective jamming during the operation. To ensure information integrity, all social media handles except the ADG Strategic Communication were closed to maintain a single, reliable source of updates.

Key Points: Army Chief on Operation Sindoor's Multi-Domain Synergy

  • Ground intel & cyber enabled precision strikes
  • Navy repositioning shaped strategic calculus
  • Centralized control for space & cyber domains
  • Single source of truth for information flow
3 min read

Operation Sindoor showcased multi-domain synergy, says Army Chief Dwivedi at Ran Samwad seminar

Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi details how land, air, sea, cyber & space forces combined in Operation Sindoor for strategic success.

"That sequence of mutually enabling action--that is the essence of the multi-domain operation. - General Upendra Dwivedi"

Bengaluru, April 9

Chief of Army Staff, General Upendra Dwivedi, on Thursday, reflected on the importance of multi-domain operations during Operation Sindoor.

Speaking at the Tri-Service seminar 'Ran Samwad', General Dwivedi said that the operation against Pakistan was "a sequence of mutually enabling action" from the three armed forces.

"In Operation Sindoor, it was a ground intelligence network coupled with cyber and EW inputs that gave the joint Army-Air Force targeting cycle its precision, while the Navy's repositioning shaped the strategic calculus simultaneously. No single domain decided the operation. Each domain created the condition that the other needed. That sequence of mutually enabling action--that is the essence of the multi-domain operation," he said.

Emphasising that all the domains work differently within the interplay, he stated that the domains work best when centralised and that they get better when synergised because of MDO.

"It's also worth noting that all domains do not operate the same way within this interplay. Space, cyber, and cognitive domains work best when centralised. Land warfare, by its very nature, works best when decentralised in terms of control, initiative, and execution, while being centralised or synergistic in effect. That means a complex adaptive system, which is the forte or the core complexity of land warfare, is now being made more adaptive and responsive to central thought due to interdependencies and lateral flow. This means these small pockets of complex adaptive systems can now better get synergised because of this MDO (Multi-Domain Operations)," General said.

He further stated that during Operation Sindoor, Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) in the drones had gotten difficult.

"In Operation Sindoor, one of the lessons we learned was that when the drones were flying, IFF (Identification Friend or Foe) was difficult; the jamming was also very effective. We didn't know for whom. So that is what something has to be understood... It's a lesson which we have drawn, and we have to move forward from that."

To ensure an honest flow of information during the Operation, General Dwivedi said that, other than the ADG Strategic Communication, all other social media handles were closed.

"In Operation Sindoor, we have closed on all the Twitter handles and all the social media handles other than the ADG Strat Comm. So there was a single source of truth, which went from the soldier to the topman to everybody looking at to get the information."

"When it comes to leadership, again, we have to look at the aspect of a spider, a starfish or Aztecs versus Apaches... we have to see the credibility increases if the source of truth is different and everybody is converging to the same information. But if you have a single source of truth and it's giving information, then it may not be considered a source of truth. Keeping that in view, there are always views that you should have a single organisation, and you should have multiple organisations giving a fair kind of information, which is considered near truth," he added.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
The point about controlling social media to ensure a "single source of truth" is very interesting, and frankly, a bit concerning. While I understand the need for operational security during a conflict, in a democracy, we must be careful about information control. Transparency builds public trust.
V
Vikram M
The IFF challenge with drones is a serious lesson. Our enemies are also adapting their technology. We need to invest heavily in indigenous R&D for electronic warfare and counter-drone systems. Atmanirbhar Bharat in defence is not just a slogan, it's a necessity.
P
Priya S
It's reassuring to hear our leadership speak so clearly about complex military strategy. The "spider vs starfish" analogy about leadership and information flow is something corporate India can learn from too! Well explained, General.
R
Rohit P
Salute to the bravery and strategic thinking of our forces. When all three services work as one fist, no adversary can stand against us. This multi-domain approach is the future. More power to our soldiers and their leaders!
K
Karthik V
The seminar being held in Bengaluru, our tech capital, is apt. The cyber and space domains are now battlefields. Hope the collaboration between DRDO, ISRO, and the armed forces deepens. We have the brainpower, we need the seamless integration.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50