Ex-R&AW Chief Sood: Pakistan Merely a Venue, Not Mediator in US-Iran Talks

Former R&AW chief Vikram Sood has clarified that Pakistan's involvement in potential US-Iran peace talks is limited to providing a venue, not active mediation. He expressed scepticism about Pakistan's neutrality, suggesting it is aligned with American interests, and doubted Iran's full trust due to historical Shia-Sunni complexities. Sood also highlighted Pakistan's relative isolation in the Middle East, with few strong ties to Shia-majority nations. Meanwhile, Pakistan's Ambassador to the US and former US President Donald Trump have acknowledged the ongoing, complex facilitation efforts.

Key Points: Pakistan's Role in US-Iran Talks: Venue, Not Mediator

  • Pakistan's role is logistical, not diplomatic
  • Scepticism over Pakistan's neutrality with US
  • Historical Shia-Sunni tensions limit Iran's trust
  • Pakistan isolated in Shia-majority Middle East
  • US President claims talks show "positive progress"
3 min read

"Only proposing a venue, not mediating talks": Former R&AW Chief Vikram Sood on Pakistan as the mediator of US-Iran peace talks

Former R&AW chief Vikram Sood downplays Pakistan's mediation role, calling it a logistical venue provider lacking neutrality and Iran's full trust.

"He's only providing a venue. He's not sitting in monitoring the proceedings. - Vikram Sood"

New Delhi, March 31

Former Research and Analysis Wing chief Vikram Sood downplayed reports of Pakistan as a mediator in potential Iran peace talks, suggesting its role is limited to offering logistical support rather than active diplomacy.

In an interview with ANI, Sood said, "He's only providing a venue. He's not sitting in monitoring the proceedings."

Sood further remarked that Pakistan may be perceived by the United States (US) as a "reliable chap" that could help facilitate discussions indirectly. "That is my impression that you know you find a room to sit in a neutral place to talk, not neutral actually, he is in America's pockets," he said, indicating scepticism over Islamabad's neutrality in such efforts.

On whether Iran would trust Pakistan, Sood expressed uncertainty, pointing to historical and sectarian complexities. "I don't know. Maybe a bit, but there is the Shia-Sunni angle; there has been trouble in the past. So, I don't think there is full trust," he said.

Highlighting regional dynamics, he said that Pakistan remains relatively isolated in terms of ties with Shia-majority countries."Pakistan, in that sense, is rather lonely in the Middle East. It has very few Shia friends, Shia countries. I think Azerbaijan and a few others, one or two others with a Shia population, like Bahrain, but really not much," Sood added.

Meanwhile, Pakistan's Ambassador to the US, Rizwan Saeed Sheikh, in an interview with Fox News, has said that the efforts to facilitate US-Iran peace talks are underway, but cautioned that the process will be complex and time-consuming.

He underscored the difficulties posed by conditions inside Iran, noting disruptions caused in the communication channels by the ongoing conflict.

"Let's look at the fact that Iran is a war-torn country with the communication channels certainly disrupted, and it is not even easy to get responses in a good time from the system that currently is in place there. So you would have noticed that these deadlines have been extended in the past, in recent past, and we are working religiously with regard to the current deadline," he said.

The ambassador added that while Pakistan is playing a facilitating role, the responsibility for successful negotiations ultimately lies with the "conflicting" parties involved.

"The process will take its own due course, and while Pakistan continues to be the facilitator, it is actually upon the conflicting parties themselves to not only create the prerequisites for negotiations and to be able to conduct them in all earnest, but they will have to take the decisions which make it successful," he said.

Earlier, US President Donald Trump claimed that indirect negotiations between the United States and Iran, facilitated by Pakistani intermediaries, are making "positive progress".

Speaking about the ongoing backchannel diplomacy, Trump said talks are underway through Pakistani "emissaries", though he declined to provide specific details when asked whether a ceasfire deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz could be reached in the coming days.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
Interesting analysis. The Shia-Sunni angle is crucial here. Pakistan's relationships in the Middle East are indeed complicated, especially with Iran. It's hard to see them as a trusted broker in this context.
P
Priya S
This is just Pakistan trying to get some international relevance and maybe more dollars from the US. Good that a seasoned expert like Sood is calling it out. "In America's pockets" sums it up perfectly.
R
Rohit P
While I agree with the overall skepticism, we must also acknowledge that any step towards reducing tensions in our neighborhood is welcome. A stable Middle East is good for India's energy security and our diaspora. Hope the talks succeed, whoever facilitates them.
M
Michael C
The ambassador's point about disrupted communication channels inside Iran is a very practical challenge. It's easy to criticize from the outside, but on-ground logistics for such talks must be a nightmare. Pakistan might just be the only party both sides can tolerate for basic coordination.
K
Kavya N
Sood's comment about Pakistan being "lonely" in the Middle East is so accurate. They've burned bridges with many Arab nations too. This mediator role feels like a desperate PR move. India, with its balanced ties with all Gulf nations and Iran, is a far more credible player, but of course, we won't be asked.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50