Fri, 10 Jul 2026 · LIVE
Updated Jul 10, 2026 · 03:45
Karnataka News Updated Jul 10, 2026

Karnataka CM Shivakumar Assures No Guarantee Schemes Will Be Stopped

Karnataka CM DK Shivakumar assured that no guarantee scheme will be stopped despite a verification drive. The government is issuing residential certificates for electoral roll revision and has set up help desks. Discrepancies were found in CAG reports, including multiple accounts linked to single phone numbers and benefits availed after death. Beneficiaries of Gruha Jyoti and Gruha Lakshmi schemes must submit renewal applications, but all eligible beneficiaries will continue to receive benefits.

"No guarantee scheme will be stopped": Karnataka CM Shivakumar

Bengaluru, July 10

Karnataka Chief Minister DK Shivakumar on Thursday said the Congress government is committed to protecting the voting rights of all citizens and will ensure that no eligible beneficiary is deprived of guarantee schemes.

Addressing a press conference, he said the government has decided to issue residential certificates to those who require them for the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.

"We have given the right to vote, the right to lead. To protect your right to vote, we have already decided that everyone should be given residential certificates. Those who need a 10-year residential certificate will be given," he said.

Shivakumar said the state already has 4.5 lakh caste certificates for SC, ST, OBC and minorities, along with income certificates.

"We have also made arrangements to provide them online. For those who need residential certificates, we have made arrangements to deliver them free of cost to their doorsteps. Apart from this, we have set up help desks at every booth to help people retain their voting rights," he said.

Referring to the state's guarantee schemes, CM Shivakumar said the government is conducting a verification drive.

He pointed out discrepancies found in CAG reports, including multiple accounts linked to a single phone number and money being credited to 5-10 accounts of one person. The government has also received information about people continuing to avail benefits even after death, he said.

"We are verifying all of this. We have also received information about lakhs of people and over Rs 100 crore after death. We will stop that and ask them to provide fresh information," he said.

Shivakumar added that for Gruha Jyoti and Gruha Lakshmi schemes, beneficiaries will have to submit a renewal application. However, he clarified that no scheme will be stopped.

"For any reason, we will not stop any scheme. We will take steps to provide it to all eligible beneficiaries. Our schemes will continue. In the Siddaramaiah government, whatever decision we have taken together, no program will be stopped. Everything will continue," he said.

"But there were some issues. Our auditors have guided us on that, and we are reviewing it," he added.

— ANI

Reader Comments

Nisha Z

Ye sab theek hai, but why only now? 🤔 Elections are coming in 2028, so this sudden verification drive reeks of political gimmickry. Should have been done from day one. Also, residential certificates free of cost is good idea but implementation will be key.

Sneha F

As a Gruha Lakshmi beneficiary, I'm relieved that no scheme is being stopped. ₹2,000 per month makes a real difference for women like me. But yes, those taking advantage of the system should be caught. Fair verification is welcome.

Ravi K

Help desks at booths is a smart move. Many elderly and rural folks don't even know they need residential certificates for voting. But 4.5 lakh caste certificates already sounds massive diversion from real issues - we need jobs, not just certificates!

Tanya I

Discrepancy of ₹100 crore after deaths? Bhai, that's serious corruption! 😡 But Shivakumar saying "no scheme will be stopped" is just populism. They should focus on quality of implementation rather than just numbers. My aunt in Hubli still hasn't received her Gruha Jyoti benefits after 6 months.

James A

Interesting to see this from a state perspective. In the US, voter ID laws are always controversial. Here they're tying it to welfare schemes which is pragmatic. But the verification process needs transparency - who decides what's "fresh information"? Could be used to disenfranchise people politically.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Reader Voices

Leave a comment

Be kind. Add to the conversation. 0/50
Thank you — your comment has been submitted.
JS blocked