NewKerala.com

Calcutta HC Chief Justice Chairs Key Meeting on Bengal Voter List Adjudication

Calcutta High Court Chief Justice Sujoy Paul will chair a crucial meeting to finalize the appointment of judicial officers to oversee the adjudication of claims and objections from the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in West Bengal. This follows a Supreme Court order directing such a process, with the final voters' list still scheduled for publication on February 28, excluding cases with "logical discrepancies." The ruling Trinamool Congress has welcomed the court's intervention for ensuring impartiality, while opposition parties have criticized the order as uniquely singling out West Bengal. The political debate centers on allegations from the BJP about illegal voters and from the TMC about the revision being a ploy to implement an NRC-like exercise.

Key Points: Calcutta HC Meeting on Judicial Officers for Bengal Voter Roll Revision

  • Meeting to appoint judicial officers for voter roll claims
  • Final voters' list due Feb 28 excluding discrepancies
  • Opposition calls SC order a "shame" for Bengal
  • Ruling party hails intervention for impartiality
3 min read

Meeting to be chaired by Calcutta HC Chief Justice today for appointing judicial officers to oversee adjudication of SIR claims

Calcutta HC Chief Justice chairs meeting to appoint judicial officers for adjudicating Bengal voter roll claims, following Supreme Court order.

"all claims, objections, and logical discrepancy cases will now be handled by impartial judicial officers - Trinamool Congress"

Kolkata, Feb 21

The Calcutta High Court Chief Justice, Sujoy Paul, will chair a crucial meeting on Saturday to finalise the blueprint for appointment of serving, as well as retired judicial officers to oversee adjudication of claims and objections arising from the ongoing Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in poll-bound West Bengal, which was directed by a three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court on Friday.

The meeting to be chaired by Justice Paul will be attended, among others, by the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO), West Bengal, Manoj Kumar Agarwal, West Bengal Chief Secretary, Nandini Goswami, the acting state Director General of Police, Peeyush Pandey, West Bengal Advocate General, Kishore Datta, and one additional solicitor general on behalf of the Union government.

As per the apex court's order the final voters' list in West Bengal will be published as scheduled on February 28, excluding cases involving "logical discrepancies" that will be referred to judicial officers for adjudication.

Accordingly, the CEO of West Bengal had also assured the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC), Gyanesh Kumar, that the final voters' list will be published on February 28. Subsequently, supplementary lists would be published based on the recommendations of the judicial officers on those "logical discrepancy" cases that would be referred to them.

Political observers are viewing the apex court's unprecedented order on Friday regarding the appointment of judicial officers for adjudication of the revision exercise as a typical example of how increasing judicial involvement is becoming necessary in West Bengal in issues about procedural details, where political interests are allegedly reigning over other aspects.

Meanwhile, the Opposition parties in West Bengal have started claiming that the decision of the apex court on the appointment of judicial officers for the adjudication of the revision exercise is a matter of shame for West Bengal, since similar orders from the apex court were not called in for any other state or Union Territory, where parallel revision exercises are taking place.

Revision exercises are also taking place in Tamil Nadu and Kerala, which are also going for Assembly polls this year, like West Bengal.

Since the beginning, the ruling Trinamool Congress had been opposing the revision exercise and claimed that the SIR was in reality a ploy of the Union Government and the BJP to slap the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in West Bengal and remove names of genuine voters.

The party on Friday hailed the apex court's intervention and said that all claims, objections, and logical discrepancy cases will now be handled by impartial judicial officers appointed by the Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court.

On the other hand, the BJP had claimed that the reason why the Trinamool Congress had been opposing the SIR was that it aimed to retain the names of illegal Bangladeshi and Rohingya voters in the list.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priyanka N
While judicial oversight is good, it's indeed a sad commentary on the state of affairs in Bengal that the apex court had to step in so directly. No other poll-going state needs this level of micromanagement. The political climate here has forced the judiciary's hand.
A
Aman W
Finally some sense will prevail! The voter list revision was being turned into a political football. Let the judges decide on the discrepancies. At least we can trust them more than the local administration which is under so much pressure.
S
Sarah B
As an observer, it's fascinating to see the judiciary playing such an active role in electoral integrity. This meeting chaired by the Chief Justice is crucial. Hope they appoint officers who are truly impartial and can work fast before the polls.
K
Karthik V
The TMC's sudden U-turn, from opposing SIR to hailing the court order, says it all. They know the game is up. A proper revision was always needed. Border states have unique challenges, and a correct voter list is the first step to a legitimate government.
M
Meera T
My respectful criticism: While the intent is good, this sets a concerning precedent. Should the judiciary be this involved in the executive function of preparing rolls? It shows a breakdown of trust in our democratic institutions, which is worrying for the long term.
V
Varun X

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50