Maharashtra Passes Anti-Conversion Bill Amid Heated Assembly Debate

The Maharashtra Legislative Assembly has passed the Freedom of Religion Bill-2026, aimed at preventing religious conversions carried out through coercion, fraud, or allurement. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis defended the legislation, stating it is not aimed at any specific religion but follows similar laws already enacted in several other Indian states. The bill's passage revealed divisions within the opposition Maha Vikas Aghadi, with Shiv Sena(UBT) supporting it while Congress, NCP, and Samajwadi Party opposed. The bill now moves to the Legislative Council and mandates a legal process for individuals wishing to convert voluntarily.

Key Points: Maharashtra Freedom of Religion Bill Passed to Curb Forced Conversions

  • Bill targets forced religious conversions
  • CM says law follows other states' model
  • Shiv Sena(UBT) supports, Congress & NCP oppose
  • Requires official notification for voluntary conversion
3 min read

Maha Assembly passes Freedom of Religion Bill to curb forced conversions

Maharashtra Assembly passes bill to prevent religious conversions by force or fraud. CM Fadnavis says law applies to all religions, sparks debate among allies.

"is not directed against any specific religion - Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis"

Mumbai, March 17

The Maharashtra Freedom of Religion Bill-2026 was passed after a heated debate on late Monday night in the state Legislative Assembly. The ruling Mahayuti government strongly defended the necessity of the Bill to curb the unlawful and forced conversion, while cracks surfaced within the Maha Vikas Aghadi government after the Shiv Sena extended its support, but other allies, including Congress, NCP and Samajwadi Party, opposed the bill.

The Bill will now be referred to the Legislative Council for passage. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis clarified that the Bill "is not directed against any specific religion. Instead, he emphasised that it is being introduced solely to prevent religious conversions carried out through coercion, fraud, or allurement.

The Chief Minister explained the government's stance while addressing the Legislative Assembly. The Bill, titled the 'Maharashtra Freedom of Religion Act, 2026', was tabled in the House on Friday by the Minister of State for Home (Rural), Dr Pankaj Bhoyar, to curb conversions happening via baiting, deception, or force.

CM Fadnavis noted that anti-conversion laws are already in effect in several states, including Odisha, Arunachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Haryana, Karnataka, and Rajasthan. Following this trend, Maharashtra has decided to implement a similar law.

He stated that Article 25 of the Indian Constitution grants every citizen the right to freedom of religion -- the right to profess, practice, and propagate one's faith. However, converting someone through fraud, pressure, force, or temptation is inherently wrong, making this law necessary to curb such incidents. "Individuals wishing to convert voluntarily must follow a legal process. The person must inform authorised officials about the conversion. Competent authorities will verify that the conversion is indeed voluntary before granting approval," he said.

Supporting the Bill, Bhaskar Jadhav of the Shiv Sena(UBT) said it aims to protect the right to religious freedom and prevent illegal religious conversions. It is comprehensive and does not target any specific religion, despite rumours or misconceptions. The objective is to curb unethical practices and misuse of religion that harm individuals or communities.

Jadhav said there are false claims in the media suggesting that the Bill targets a particular religion; this is incorrect. The bill applies to all religions equally, and its intent is to prevent coercion or inducement in religious conversion.

During the debate, the NCP(SP) MLA Jitendra Awhad sparked a major controversy in the Legislative Assembly while speaking on the Maharashtra Freedom of Religion Bill-2026. During his speech, Awhad cited various historical instances. However, an uproar erupted in the House when he made a specific reference regarding the coronation of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj. Speaker Rahul Narwekar directed Awhad to express regret, after which the MLA tendered an apology to the House.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The intent seems good, but the execution is key. We've seen similar laws in other states sometimes misused for harassment. The "verification" process must be transparent and quick, not a tool to intimidate. 🤔
R
Rohit P
Why bring Shivaji Maharaj into this debate? Totally unnecessary and disrespectful. Glad the Speaker made him apologize. The discussion should stay on the legal merits of the bill, not historical provocations.
S
Sarah B
Interesting to see the political cracks. Shiv Sena supporting the ruling side on this. Shows how alliances work (or don't work) in Maharashtra politics. The bill might pass, but the MVA looks shaky.
V
Vikram M
If the bill is truly religion-neutral as they claim, then it should be welcomed. Forced conversion by any means - coercion, fraud, or allurement - is wrong, whether it's for money, marriage, or social pressure. The law must protect genuine faith.
K
Kavya N
As a citizen, my concern is personal freedom. If two adults decide to marry and one converts voluntarily, will this law create bureaucratic hurdles for them? The process shouldn't become a barrier for personal choices made with consent.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50