Karnataka HC Grants Interim Relief to Cafe Coffee Day in FEMA Case

The Karnataka High Court has granted interim relief to Cafe Coffee Day, directing the Enforcement Directorate to postpone a personal hearing scheduled for January 30 in an ongoing FEMA case. The court's order, binding until the next hearing on February 23, follows similar relief granted to the company's CEO, Malavika Hegde. Senior Advocate Sajan Poovayya argued the ED failed to follow due procedure by not providing written reasons for the inquiry in advance. The FEMA proceedings are related to FDI received in 2010, with the company contesting the long delay since the alleged 2009 events.

Key Points: Karnataka HC Grants Interim Relief to Cafe Coffee Day in FEMA Case

  • Court stays ED's FEMA proceedings
  • Hearing postponed from Jan 30
  • Relief also for CEO Malavika Hegde
  • Challenge over procedural lapse
2 min read

Karnataka HC grants interim relief to Cafe Coffee Day in FEMA case

Karnataka High Court stays ED's FEMA proceedings against Cafe Coffee Day, directing postponement of personal hearing. Next hearing on Feb 23.

"This due procedure was not followed, and the framing of charges under the FEMA against the CCD chain is not permissible in law. - Sajan Poovayya"

Bengaluru, Jan 21

The Karnataka High Court on Wednesday granted relief to the Indian retail cafe chain Cafe Coffee Day in connection with the case lodged by the Enforcement Directorate under the provisions of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999.

The CCD had challenged the proceedings under FEMA in court.

The Bench, headed by Justice B.M. Shyam Prasad, passed the order in this regard.

The court has directed the ED to postpone the personal hearing of the representatives of CCD, scheduled to be held on January 30.

The court further stated that the order will be binding on the ED till the court hears CCD's plea on February 23.

The direction has been given to the Special Officer attached to the ED.

The court had earlier granted interim relief to CCD's CEO, Malavika Hegde, on January 19 and stayed the FEMA proceedings against her. Both matters have been listed for further consideration on February 23.

Senior Advocate Sajan Poovayya, appearing on behalf of CCD, argued that the Enforcement Directorate cannot conduct a personal hearing unless the FEMA authority first records, in writing, the reasons for deciding that an inquiry is necessary.

He further submitted that these written reasons must be communicated to the person or entity receiving the notice well in advance, as required under FEMA rules and an internal circular.

"This due procedure was not followed, and the framing of charges under the FEMA against the CCD chain is not permissible in law," he submitted.

The FEMA proceedings were initiated following the receipt of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) by the Cafe Coffee Day Enterprises Limited (CDEL) in 2010. The FEMA had alleged that foreign funds were utilised for the acquisition of shares in Indian companies in violation of provisions and regulations under the FEMA.

The CCD had filed a petition before the court following the issuance of notice on January 7 under the provisions of Rule 4 (3) of the Foreign Exchange Management (Adjudication Proceedings and Appeal) Rules, 2000.

The Court noted Advocate Sajan Poovayya's argument that the FEMA proceedings are connected to an Enforcement Directorate case registered in 2022, even though the alleged events date back to around 2009.

The CCD argued that this long delay makes the FEMA proceedings invalid. After hearing these initial arguments, the Court asked the ED to present its response in the case.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
CCD is such an iconic Indian brand, a part of our college memories. 😊 Hope they get a fair hearing. The delay from 2009/2010 to 2022 is concerning though. Why did it take so long to initiate proceedings?
R
Rohit P
The argument about procedural lapse is strong. Government agencies must adhere to the rulebook they themselves create. You can't just issue notices without proper written reasons. This interim relief sends a clear message about accountability.
S
Sarah B
As someone who follows business news, this highlights a common issue. FDI regulations are complex, and retrospective scrutiny after 12-13 years creates immense uncertainty for businesses. It hurts investor confidence.
V
Vikram M
Respectfully, while due process is important, we must also ensure foreign exchange laws are not violated. If funds were misused, it must be investigated thoroughly. Hope the ED presents a solid case on the next date.
K
Kavya N
Malavika Hegde has been working so hard to turn the company around after the tragedy. This legal overhang must be so stressful for the management. The court's interim relief to her earlier was also a humane gesture. 🙏

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50