NewKerala.com

Jagadguru Hails Bhojshala Verdict as Historic Victory for Nation

Jagadguru Swami Satishacharya has welcomed the Madhya Pradesh High Court's verdict on the Bhojshala case as a historic victory for the entire nation. The court granted the Hindu side the right to worship and recognized the complex as belonging to Raja Bhoj. The verdict partially set aside the ASI's 2003 order and directed the government to consider repatriating an idol from a London museum. The court also suggested allocating alternative land for the Muslim side and completely set aside their right to offer Namaz.

Key Points: Bhojshala Verdict: Hindu Worship Rights Restored

  • MP High Court grants Hindu side worship rights at Bhojshala
  • Court recognizes complex as belonging to Raja Bhoj
  • ASI's 2003 order partially set aside
  • Court directs government to consider idol repatriation from London museum
3 min read

Jagadguru Swami Satishacharya hails Bhojshala verdict, calls it 'victory for entire nation'

Jagadguru Swami Satishacharya calls Bhojshala verdict a historic victory for the nation. MP High Court grants Hindu side worship rights, sets aside ASI order.

"This is not merely a victory for Madhya Pradesh; it is a victory for the entire nation. - Jagadguru Swami Satishacharya"

Kanpur, May 15

Jagadguru Swami Shri Satishacharya Ji Maharaj has welcomed the court's verdict on the Bhojshala case, terming it a "historic" moment and a significant triumph for the country.

Earlier today, the Indore Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court delivered a historic verdict, granting the Hindu side the right to worship and recognising the complex as belonging to Raja Bhoj.

Speaking to ANI in Kanpur, the spiritual leader expressed his gratitude toward the judiciary and called upon the Hindu community to celebrate the decision.

"First and foremost, this is not merely a victory for Madhya Pradesh; it is a victory for the entire nation. This is a historic verdict. Sanatanis and Hindus should celebrate this verdict with great enthusiasm," Swami Satishacharya said.

Emphasising the importance of the legal outcome, he added, "I extend my deepest gratitude to the Court, and I hold this verdict in the highest regard. I believe that a verdict of this nature was urgently needed."

Addressing media personnel after the court's order, Vishnu Shankar Jain, representing the Hindu side, termed the judgment as "historic," noting that the court has partially set aside the Archaeological Survey of India's (ASI) order dated April 7, 2003.

"The Indore High Court has delivered a historic verdict, partially setting aside the ASI's order dated April 7, 2003. Furthermore, the Court has granted the Hindu side the right to worship and has recognised the Bhojshala complex as belonging to Raja Bhoj," Jain said.

The advocate further revealed that the court addressed the demand for the repatriation of the idol, which is currently housed in a museum in London.

"Regarding our demand for the repatriation of the idol currently housed in a London museum, the Court has directed the government to consider this request; the Court also noted that the Muslim side is free to present its views before the government as well. Additionally, the Court has asked the government to consider allocating alternative land to the Muslim side," he said.

In an effort to provide a resolution for the other party, Jain said that the court has suggested the allocation of alternate land for the Muslim side.

"The Court has granted us the right to perform worship rituals and has directed the government to oversee the management of the site. The ASI's previous order, which granted the right to offer Namaz (prayers), has been completely set aside; henceforth, only Hindu worship shall take place there," he added.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As an outsider looking in, I find this fascinating. It's commendable that the court suggested providing alternate land for the Muslim side - that shows a balanced approach. Though I'm not Hindu, I respect the emotional significance of reclaiming a sacred site. Let's hope the government follows through on the land allocation and the repatriation of the idol from London.
P
Priya S
I'm happy for the Hindu community but I have mixed feelings. We need to ensure this doesn't lead to further division in society. The court's suggestion for alternate land is a wise middle path. History is complex, and we should move forward with respect for all faiths. Let's celebrate without hurting anyone's sentiments.
K
Karan T
Swami Satishacharya is absolutely right - this IS a victory for the entire nation, not just one community. When historical wrongs are corrected, the whole country benefits. The ASI's 2003 order was always controversial, allowing namaz at a site that was clearly a Hindu temple. I'm just glad the judiciary examined all evidence thoroughly. Ab hum sahi raaste par hain! 🇮🇳
R
Rohit L
I'm a bit skeptical about all this celebration. Yes, the verdict is legally correct based on evidence, but these "victory" narratives can polarise society. What about the Muslim community who prayed there for generations? The court gave an elegant solution with alternate land, but will the state really implement it fairly? Let's focus on harmony, not triumphalism.
A
Aryan P
Bhagwan ka ashirwaad hai! The repatriation of the idol from London is a huge deal too - finally someone

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50