Iran’s Proposal to US Aims to Permanently End Imposed War, Says Deputy FM

Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi confirmed that Tehran's recent proposal to the US, mediated by Pakistan, aims to permanently end the imposed war. Iran expressed readiness for both diplomacy and military action while maintaining deep distrust of America. The proposal comes after US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff sent amendments focusing on Iran's nuclear enrichment freeze. US President Donald Trump expressed dissatisfaction with the proposal and doubted a final agreement could be reached.

Key Points: Iran Deputy FM: Proposal to US Aims to End Imposed War

  • Iran's proposal via Pakistan aims to permanently end imposed war
  • Deputy FM emphasizes readiness for diplomacy or military action
  • US amendments focus on nuclear enrichment freeze
  • Trump expresses dissatisfaction with Iran's proposal
3 min read

Iran's Deputy FM says Tehran's proposal to US aimed at "permanently ending imposed war"

Iran's Deputy FM Kazem Gharibabadi says Tehran's proposal via Pakistan aims to permanently end the imposed war, urging US to choose diplomacy or confrontation.

"Iran has presented its plan to Pakistan as a mediator with the aim of permanently ending the imposed war, and now the ball is in America's court - Kazem Gharibabadi"

Tehran, May 2

Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister for Legal and International Affairs, Kazem Gharibabadi, on Saturday confirmed that Tehran's recent diplomatic proposal to the United States, presented via Pakistan as a mediator, is intended to "permanently end the imposed war" and bring a resolution to the ongoing tensions between the two countries.

According to the state broadcaster, Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting (IRIB), the remarks came in a gathering of foreign diplomats and ambassadors based in Tehran, where Gharibabadi emphasised Iran's preparedness for both diplomatic negotiations and any potential military aggression.

"Iran has always believed in interest-based diplomacy to resolve existing issues and has played its part," the deputy minister said, as quoted by IRIB.

"Iran has presented its plan to Pakistan as a mediator with the aim of permanently ending the imposed war, and now the ball is in America's court to choose the path of diplomacy or to continue the confrontational approach," he added.

Gharibabadi noted that while Tehran is prepared to engage diplomatically, it maintains deep distrust toward the United States, questioning its commitment to honest and meaningful dialogue.

"Iran is ready for both paths in order to ensure its national interests and security, and in any case, it will always maintain its pessimism and distrust of America and its honesty in the path of diplomacy," Gharibabadi said as quoted by IRIB.

His remarks come after Iran submitted its latest proposal aimed at advancing negotiations to end the ongoing West Asia conflict with the US, in response to recent amendments introduced by Washington to a draft plan aimed at ending the conflict.

According to Axios, citing sources familiar with the matter, the latest proposal submitted by Iran through Pakistan, which is acting as a mediator in the talks, comes after US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff sent a list of amendments on Monday, focusing on reintroducing the nuclear issue into the draft framework.

According to Iranian state media, IRNA, Tehran submitted its latest proposal aimed at advancing negotiations to end the ongoing West Asia conflict with the US.

Tehran handed over the text of its new proposal to Pakistan on Thursday evening, though details of Tehran's counter-terms have not been fully disclosed.

Axios, citing the source, further reported that one of the proposed US amendments calls for Iran to commit that it will not transfer any enriched uranium from its bombed nuclear facilities or restart any nuclear-related activities at those sites while negotiations are ongoing.

Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump on Friday expressed dissatisfaction with Iran's latest proposal aimed at ending the ongoing conflict, while also casting doubt on whether a final agreement can be reached.

Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump said, "They want to make a deal, but I'm not satisfied with it, so we'll see what happens."

He did not elaborate on the specific aspects of the proposal he found unacceptable but indicated uncertainty over Tehran's willingness to ultimately agree to a settlement.

"They've made strides, but I'm not sure if they ever get there," Trump added while speaking on the White House's South Lawn.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As someone who follows international relations closely, I find it fascinating that Iran is choosing Pakistan as a go-between. The US has been applying maximum pressure for years, and now Tehran is offering an "interest-based diplomacy" path. But with Trump expressing dissatisfaction, it seems like both sides are playing hardball. The nuclear issue is a major sticking point too. Let's see if this leads anywhere.
P
Priya S
Iran saying they have distrust of America is understandable after all the sanctions and broken promises. India has been in a similar position with some Western powers. But honestly, I think both sides need to sit at the table and talk. War in West Asia affects the whole world, and we in India feel the oil price hikes every time tensions rise. Diplomatic solution is the only way forward. 🤞
M
Michael C
It's interesting that Iran mentions "imposed war" - they clearly see the US as the aggressor in this conflict. The proposal through Pakistan is a smart diplomatic move, but I'm skeptical about the outcome. The US has been pushing for nuclear concessions, and Iran seems unwilling to give up its enrichment program. This could be a long negotiation process. The ball is indeed in America's court now.
V
Vikram M
Pakistan as a mediator? That's an interesting choice given the complex relationship between Iran and Pakistan. But if it helps reduce tensions, why not? India has always advocated for dialogue and peaceful resolution of conflicts. The West Asia situation is a powder keg, and any escalation would be disastrous. I hope both sides show flexibility and come to an agreement. Diplomacy should always be the first option.
E
Emma D
The fact that

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50