US-Iran Talks May Resume in Islamabad with JD Vance Leading Delegation

The United States is considering a second round of negotiations with Iran, with Islamabad emerging as a probable venue and Vice President JD Vance likely to lead the American delegation. Former President Donald Trump indicated momentum was building for talks, praising Pakistan's Field Marshal and suggesting a meeting could happen soon. Key issues include Iran's uranium enrichment, with Iranian officials stating an end to enrichment "will not be accepted." While US officials confirm talks are under discussion, no final decision or schedule has been announced.

Key Points: US-Iran Talks May Resume in Islamabad, Vance to Lead

  • Islamabad emerges as probable venue
  • JD Vance likely to lead US delegation
  • Trump advisers remain in contact with Iran
  • Uranium enrichment remains key sticking point
  • No final decision on talks has been made
4 min read

Iran-US talks may resume in Islamabad with JD Vance likely to lead the delegation: Reports

Reports suggest a second round of US-Iran negotiations could be held in Islamabad, with VP JD Vance likely leading the American delegation.

"something could be happening over the next two days - Donald Trump"

Washington DC, April 15

The United States is weighing the possibility of holding a second round of negotiations with Iran, with Vice President JD Vance likely to lead the American delegation and Pakistan's capital, Islamabad, emerging as a probable venue, CNN reported.

Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff and his son-in-law Jared Kushner, who have headed diplomatic talks since before the war began, are also expected to attend any possible second meeting, the sources said, quoted by CNN.

Trump has entrusted his three senior advisers with the responsibility of exploring a diplomatic pathway to end the ongoing hostilities. Vance, Witkoff and Kushner have remained in contact with Iranian officials and intermediaries following a recent 21-hour round of discussions, as part of efforts to move closer to a potential agreement. However, officials are still deliberating over the specifics of a second round, and no final decision has been taken.

"Future talks are under discussion, but nothing has been scheduled at this time," a US official said, quoted by CNN.

The development comes after former US President Donald Trump indicated that momentum was building for another round of talks. In a telephonic interview with The New York Post, he said that "something could be happening" over the next two days in Pakistan.

Trump said the ongoing discussions were "happening, but, you know, a little bit slow," while suggesting that a second round of direct negotiations aimed at ending the ongoing seven-week conflict would likely be held in Europe.

The remarks by Trump came after reports had circulated online purportedly claiming that the location for negotiations was being changed.

However, shortly after, Trump called back with a revised update.

"You should stay there, really, because something could be happening over the next two days, and we're more inclined to go there," he said of Islamabad. "It's more likely, you know why? Because the field marshal is doing a great job."

He was referring to Pakistan's Field Marshal Gen. Asim Munir, with whom he reportedly developed a rapport last year during heightened tensions involving India and Pakistan, which later de-escalated after a brief four-day conflict that the US helped mediate.

"He's fantastic, and therefore it's more likely that we go back there," he said. "Why should we go to some country that has nothing to do with it?"

"I just think he's a great guy. That guy. The field marshal. You know he ended the war with India, saved 30 million people," he added.

Trump also clarified that he would not personally participate in the proposed second round of negotiations and did not name who would represent the United States.

Meanwhile, he expressed dissatisfaction over reports suggesting that Washington had sought Iran's agreement to pause uranium enrichment for at least two decades following unsuccessful talks over the weekend.

"I've been saying they can't have nuclear weapons", he said, "so I don't like the 20 years."

When asked whether such a long moratorium could help secure a deal, Trump said, "I don't want them [Iran] to feel like they have a win," The New York Post quoted.

On the diplomatic front, retired Pakistani Lt Gen Muhammad Saeed, who is said to be involved in facilitating the talks, stated that Tehran had shown "flexibility" on the contentious issue of uranium enrichment, which had repeatedly stalled negotiations.

However, Trump cautioned that Iran would need to present any compromise in a politically acceptable manner domestically.

"Iran has to be able to take something back to its people that doesn't look like a surrender," said Saeed, describing the Islamic Republic's need to frame any compromise as being made "in the golden trust of the people."

Contrasting this, Mohammad Marandi, who accompanied the Iranian delegation in Islamabad, adopted a firm stance, stating, "A blockade won't change Iran's position," and adding that "ending enrichment will not be accepted," The New York Post reported.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
As an Indian, I'm always cautious when Pakistan is center-stage in geopolitics, especially involving our neighbor Iran. The article mentions the "war with India" – that's a very simplistic and problematic view of a complex history. Hope our diplomats are closely monitoring these talks.
A
Aman W
The key issue is Iran's nuclear program. Trump saying "I don't want them to feel like they have a win" shows the real challenge. Any deal needs to be solid and verifiable. JCPOA 2.0? Let's see. Pakistan hosting is fine, but the substance matters more than the location.
S
Sarah B
Respectfully, the article's framing feels a bit one-sided, heavily relying on Trump's statements. What about the Iranian perspective beyond Marandi's quote? And the mention of the India-Pakistan situation seems like an unnecessary digression that oversimplifies things. More balanced reporting would be helpful.
V
Vikram M
Talks are good, but action is better. We've seen this movie before with Iran. Hope this time it leads to something concrete for regional peace. India has strong ties and energy interests with Iran, so a stable West Asia is crucial for us too. 🇮🇳
K
Karthik V
The domestic politics angle for Iran is key. Saeed is right – any leader needs to sell a deal at home. If these talks reduce tensions, it's good for everyone, including India. But the "saved 30 million people" line about the India-Pak situation is pure hyperbole, yaar.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50