Iran Reviews US Proposal at Own Pace Amid Trump Ultimatum

Iran is reviewing a US proposal regarding the West Asia conflict at its own pace, dismissing deadlines set by American politicians. The response requires approval from multiple Iranian institutions, including Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf and the Supreme National Security Council. US President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio have expressed expectations for a response, with Rubio hoping for a "serious offer." The delay is attributed to the highly technical nature of the proposal and internal approval processes in Iran.

Key Points: Iran Reviews US Proposal at Own Pace Amid Trump Ultimatum

  • Iran reviewing US proposal at "own pace"
  • Tehran dismisses Trump's deadlines
  • Response needs approval from multiple Iranian institutions
  • Marco Rubio expects "serious offer" from Iran
3 min read

Iran reviewing US proposal at 'own pace' as Trump awaits response: Report

Iran reviews US proposal at its own pace, dismissing Trump's deadlines. Tehran awaits final approval from Supreme Leader amid West Asia conflict talks.

"The deadlines set by American politicians mean nothing; we do our own work, and we do not concern ourselves with deadlines or ultimatums. - Esmaeil Baghaei"

Tehran, May 9

Iran on Saturday said it was still reviewing the United States' proposal linked to ongoing negotiations over the West Asia conflict and would respond "at the appropriate time", according to a report by Al Jazeera.

The report said expectations had grown that Tehran would issue a response on Friday after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio indicated that Washington was expecting an answer from Iran.

However, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said the proposal remains under review and dismissed pressure from Washington over deadlines.

"The deadlines set by American politicians mean nothing; we do our own work, and we do not concern ourselves with deadlines or ultimatums," Baghaei was quoted as saying.

According to Al Jazeera, one reason behind the delay is the highly technical nature of the proposal, with Iranian negotiators closely examining every provision in the document before finalising a response.

The report added that several Iranian institutions and senior officials must also approve the response before it can be finalised.

The negotiating process reportedly involves Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), and Iran's Supreme National Security Council, which oversees major security matters, including the ongoing conflict.

Al Jazeera further reported that Iran's Supreme Leader would ultimately have to approve the final response before it is delivered to Washington.

Despite the delay, Iranian officials have maintained that discussions are ongoing and that the proposal is still being examined internally.

Earlier on Friday (local time), US President Donald Trump said that his administration is expecting a response from Iran later in the day regarding Washington's proposal aimed at ending the ongoing West Asia conflict.

Speaking to reporters before travelling to a dinner at his golf course in Sterling, Virginia, Trump said, "We'll hear from them supposedly tonight," when asked whether Washington had received any response from Tehran.

When pressed on whether he believed Iran was intentionally delaying the process, Trump said he was uncertain, adding, "We'll find out soon enough."

His remarks came after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington was anticipating an Iranian response on Friday to the proposal aimed at ending the conflict, while expressing hope that it would be "a serious offer".

"We should know something today," Rubio told reporters during a gaggle in Rome.

Rubio is currently on a diplomatic tour to Italy and the Vatican amid tension in the transatlantic relations between the US and Europe.

"We have not received that yet, as of the last hour," Rubio said, adding that Iran's internal situation could be affecting the timeline.

"Their system is still highly fractured, and it's dysfunctional as well, so that may be serving as an impediment," he added.

Rubio also said Washington hoped the Iranian response would lead to "a serious process of negotiation".

Meanwhile, on Thursday, Trump, responding to enquiries regarding whether Iran had engaged with what some had termed a "one-page proposal", Trump challenged that description of the document.

"Well, it's more than a one-page offer. It's an offer that basically said they will not have nuclear weapons; they are going to hand us the nuclear dust and many other things that we want," Trump said.

When questioned on whether the Iranian leadership had consented to these terms, Trump indicated that a verbal agreement does not necessarily signal a definitive resolution.

"They have agreed. When they agree, it doesn't mean much because the next day they forget they agreed," he said, further noting, "And you know, we're dealing with different sets of leaders."

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
Honestly, this whole back-and-forth reminds me of a schoolyard spat. The US sets deadlines, Iran ignores them, and everyone looks for leverage. From an outsider's view, both sides are playing politics. Iran's "we don't care about deadlines" stance is bold but risky—it could escalate tensions. Wish they'd just sit down and sort it out without all the theatrics.
A
Aditya G
As someone who follows geopolitics closely, I think Iran's approach is shrewd. They're not rushing because they know the US needs a deal for regional stability—Trump's statement about "different sets of leaders" shows frustration. India has used similar patience in trade talks. That said, Trump's distrust ("they forget they agreed") doesn't bode well; trust deficit is real. Kudos to Iran for not buckling under pressure.
M
Michael C
From a Western perspective, this is frustrating. The US is trying to resolve a conflict, and Iran is dragging its feet. Trump's comment about them forgetting agreements is telling—Iran's internal dysfunction (as Rubio noted) is a real obstacle. As an Indian, I see parallels with our delayed responses to some UN resolutions, but here the stakes are higher with nukes involved. Hope a peaceful resolution comes soon.
N
Nisha Z
This feels like a classic case of "who blinks first." Iran is taking its time because they've got multiple approval layers—Parliament, IRGC, Supreme Council, Supreme Leader—it's no joke. Trump's impatience is showing, but his "we'll find out soon enough" sounds like a veiled threat. As an Indian, I'd advise patience on all sides. Diplomacy isn't a race. 🇮🇳
S

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50