Indian-Origin Firms Clash in US Over Stone Slab Lawsuits and Silicosis

A contentious debate over worker safety and corporate liability unfolded in the US Congress, focusing on a bill to protect artificial stone manufacturers from silicosis-related lawsuits. Former occupational safety chief David Michaels testified against the legislation, warning it would worsen a deadly and preventable silicosis epidemic among countertop fabricators. In contrast, Gary Talwar of an Indian-origin family business urged passage, arguing distributors are unfairly sued for practices they don't control and that legal costs threaten small firms. The clash highlights the tension between using litigation to force safer alternatives and protecting businesses from liability in global supply chains.

Key Points: US Stone Slab Lawsuit Debate Draws In Indian-Origin Businesses

  • Bill would shield manufacturers from silicosis lawsuits
  • Former safety chief warns of a growing epidemic
  • Indian-origin business leader cites threat to family firms
  • Debate pits liability against workplace enforcement
  • Australia banned high-silica stone as an alternative
3 min read

Indian-origin businesses clash as US debates stone slab lawsuits

Congress debates a bill to shield stone slab firms from silicosis lawsuits, featuring clashing testimony from Indian-origin entrepreneurs and safety experts.

"Silicosis is a devastating, deadly, and thoroughly preventable disease. - David Michaels"

Washington, Jan 20

A sharp debate over worker safety, corporate liability and the future of the US stone slab industry unfolded in Congress last week, drawing in Indian-origin entrepreneurs and raising issues that resonate with Indian businesses and workers operating across global supply chains.

Testifying before a House Judiciary subcommittee, former US occupational safety chief David Michaels warned lawmakers that proposed legislation to shield artificial stone manufacturers and distributors from lawsuits would worsen what he described as a growing silicosis epidemic among countertop fabrication workers.

"Silicosis is a devastating, deadly, and thoroughly preventable disease," Michaels said, adding that artificial stone fabrication was "one of the most hazardous of all the industries where workers are exposed to silica dust."

Michaels told the panel that hundreds of workers in the United States had already been sickened, with dozens dead, after exposure to silica released while cutting and polishing artificial stone used in kitchen countertops.

Citing California health data, he said nearly 500 cases had been identified in that state alone, with 27 deaths and dozens of lung transplants. "Unless something is done to stop exposure, the number of cases, and the number of deaths, will continue to increase," he said.

He strongly opposed H.R. 5437, the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Stone Slab Products Act, arguing that lawsuits play a critical role in forcing industries to move to safer substitutes.

Michaels pointed to Australia, which banned high-silica engineered stone rather than restricting litigation, prompting manufacturers to shift to safer alternatives without job losses. "There are safe substitutes that can make equally fashionable countertops," he said, adding that shifting to substitutes would result in "no loss of American jobs."

Offering a contrasting view, Gary Talwar, vice president of Natural Stone Resources, an Indian-origin family business based in California, urged Congress to pass the bill. Talwar told lawmakers his parents immigrated legally from India in 1980 and built their enterprise from the ground up, describing it as a story rooted in the American Dream.

"Silicosis is a serious and absolutely preventable disease," Talwar said, but argued that responsibility lies with unsafe fabrication shops rather than distributors like his firm, which does not cut, grind or polish stone. "We do not control whether a shop uses wet cutting, ventilation, or PPE," he said, adding that distributors were increasingly being named in dozens of lawsuits for practices they did not oversee.

Talwar said mounting legal costs were placing enormous strain on small, often family-run businesses across the country. He told lawmakers that some firms had already spent hundreds of thousands of dollars defending themselves and were being forced to choose between litigation and running their operations. "Some are seriously considering shutting their doors," he said.

Jim Hieb, chief executive of the Natural Stone Institute, echoed those concerns, saying his trade group supported worker safety but opposed what he described as misdirected litigation against companies that sell stone slabs. "Selling stone slabs does not cause silicosis," Hieb said. "It is the disregard for safety compliance when cutting and fabricating stone slabs that creates the risk."

Rebecca Shult, chief legal officer of Cambria, a Minnesota-based quartz manufacturer, said her company supported the legislation to protect American manufacturing jobs and domestic producers.

Silicosis is caused by inhaling fine silica particles. It has long been a concern in mining, stone cutting, and construction, where regulators have struggled to curb occupational exposure. In the United States, the debate now centers on whether Congress should intervene to limit civil liability or rely on workplace enforcement and market shifts toward safer materials to prevent further disease and deaths.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
The Australian example is key. They banned the hazardous material and the industry adapted without job losses. The US should follow that model instead of shielding companies from liability. Public health must come first.
P
Priya S
My heart goes out to the workers and their families. 27 deaths in California alone is not a small number. While I understand the strain on small businesses like Mr. Talwar's, the distributors must also share some responsibility in the supply chain. They can mandate that their buyers follow safety protocols. Jaan hai toh jahaan hai (If there is life, there is a world).
A
Aman W
Respectfully, I think Mr. Talwar has a point. You can't sue a car company if someone drives recklessly without a seatbelt. The fabrication shops are at fault here. The law should target the actual violators, not everyone upstream. These lawsuits will destroy honest, hardworking immigrant businesses.
K
Karthik V
This debate feels very familiar. In India, we often struggle with balancing regulation and enterprise. The government needs to step in with clear, enforceable rules for silica content and mandatory safety gear. Let the market shift to safer alternatives, as the expert said. Innovation should solve this, not endless litigation.
M
Michael C
The data from California is alarming. This is a preventable occupational disease. Shielding manufacturers removes a critical incentive for them to develop and promote safer products. Worker safety cannot be compromised.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50