UAE's OPEC Exit 'Fully Aligned' With US, Signals Gulf Realignment: Economist

The UAE's exit from OPEC is "fully aligned" with US strategy and signals a broader realignment in Gulf politics, according to economist John Sfakianakis. He says the move places Abu Dhabi on a course toward peaceful agreement with Israel, deepening differences with Saudi Arabia. The UAE increasingly focuses on a post-oil economy, while Saudi Arabia sees a sustained future for hydrocarbons. This has created a significant political rift between the two Gulf powers on energy policy and regional issues.

Key Points: UAE OPEC Exit Aligned With US, Israel Peace: Economist

  • UAE's OPEC exit aligns with US energy and geopolitical strategy
  • Move signals deeper alignment with US-backed Israel normalization
  • Growing rift between UAE and Saudi Arabia over oil policy and regional issues
  • UAE focuses on post-oil economy and maximizing near-term output
4 min read

UAE's OPEC exit "fully aligned" with US, on course to peaceful agreement with Israel: Economist John Sfakianakis

John Sfakianakis says UAE's OPEC exit aligns with US strategy and Israel normalization, deepening rift with Saudi Arabia over oil policy and regional influence.

"The UAE does not necessarily share the view that oil will be important in the decades to come - John Sfakianakis"

Riyadh, April 30

Chief Economist and Head of Economic Research at the Gulf Research Centre, John Sfakianakis, on Thursday said that the United Arab Emirates' recent exit from the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and OPEC+ is "fully aligned" with the United States' energy and geopolitical strategy and signals a broader realignment in Gulf politics.

Speaking to ANI, on the UAE's announcement of its exit from OPEC and the broader OPEC+ grouping, Sfakianakis said that the move places Abu Dhabi on a trajectory closely aligned with Washington, particularly on energy policy and regional diplomatic priorities.

He added that this alignment also extends to US-backed regional diplomacy, including efforts encouraging Gulf states to normalise relations with Israel.

"I think that it places the UAE on a course to be fully aligned with the US. Also, it's on a course to be fully aligned with what the US would like many Gulf states, including Saudi Arabia, to be in a peaceful agreement with Israel," he said.

He pointed to the UAE's participation in the Abraham Accords as a key factor shaping its strategic orientation, noting that Washington views such steps positively and suggested that the development reinforces convergence between Abu Dhabi and Washington on Middle East policy.

"The UAE has signed the Abraham Accords. So that is something that President Trump favours, and he sees this as positive and aligned with what the UAE has done. Saudi Arabia, on the other hand, has not signed the Abraham Accords, and so in his mind, that is an issue. And definitely that deepens the rift between Saudi Arabia and the UAE," Sfakianakis added.

The Economist also highlighted growing divergence within the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), particularly between the UAE and Saudi Arabia, over long-term energy strategy.

He said Saudi Arabia and the US broadly continue to see a sustained future for hydrocarbons, while the UAE is increasingly positioning itself for a post-oil economy, focusing on diversification and expanding production in the near term, adding that Abu Dhabi is motivated to maximise output before transitioning away from hydrocarbons.

"What is interesting is that the UAE does not necessarily share the view that oil will be important in the decades to come. And so their motivation is to exit OPEC, which is containing their supply potential, and to pump more oil. And this is what they will be doing in the coming years. They will be pumping more oil, that is, the UAE, against what Saudi Arabia wants to do. And the UAE believes that there is a kind of post-oil future, which they need to double down on and diversify, and they need to sell more of what they have in the ground in order to diversify away from hydrocarbons and oil, that is," he stated.

The expert further suggested that differing economic and geopolitical approaches could deepen existing tensions between Abu Dhabi and Riyadh, which have already diverged on regional issues including Yemen, Syria, Sudan, and Lebanon.

He described the relationship as increasingly competitive, with both countries pursuing distinct visions for oil policy and regional influence.

"I definitely believe that this basically has created a huge rift, a political rift, between Saudi Arabia and the UAE. But it has been a rift for quite some time. It's nothing unique. They had differences on regional foreign policy issues and on the management of crises. The example, of course, that comes to mind is Yemen, Sudan, differences about Syria and Lebanon, and so forth. But also more existential issues about how to form oil policy, and also how to portray that oil policy through either containment or by extracting more and producing more. I think the rift will continue, and definitely we will see it reverberate either by an exit of the UAE from the Arab League, from the GCC Secretariat, and so forth," Sfakianakis stated.

While acknowledging Saudi Arabia's continued dominance in global oil production capacity, Sfakianakis said Riyadh remains a "reliable and central supplier" to global energy markets, providing stability amid shifting regional dynamics.

Earlier on Wednesday, US President Donald Trump welcomed the UAE's decision to exit the OPEC and OPEC+ alliance, saying the move could help bring down global oil and gas prices.

"That's a good thing for getting the price of gas down, getting oil down, getting everything down. They have it all. He's a great leader, actually. I'm okay. They're having some problems in OPEC," Trump said, referring to UAE President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.

On Tuesday, the UAE announced its exit from OPEC and the broader OPEC+ grouping, marking a significant shift in global oil dynamics. The country, OPEC's third-largest producer, has increasingly pushed for greater production flexibility amid the West Asia crisis and supply disruptions.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As an Indian living in the Gulf, I see this as a pragmatic move by UAE. They've been diversifying their economy for years - Dubai is proof. But the rift with Saudi Arabia could create uncertainty in the region where millions of Indians work. We need stability there 🙏
P
Priya S
The economist's analysis makes sense. UAE sees the writing on the wall for oil and wants to monetize reserves while they can. But aligning with US and Israel will complicate relations with other Muslim nations. India has to walk a diplomatic tightrope here - we need Gulf oil and jobs for our diaspora.
V
Vikram M
UAE is being smart about this. They don't want to be tied to OPEC quotas when they could be selling more oil now. The post-oil future is coming faster than many think. For India, this could mean cheaper oil in the short term and more competition for our renewable energy sector in the long run.
J
James A
The Abraham Accords were always controversial. Now we see how they're reshaping Gulf politics. UAE is essentially choosing Washington and Tel Aviv over Riyadh. For India, our strategic autonomy is being tested - we have good relations with all three, but this rift could force some uncomfortable choices.
M
Michael C
While lower oil prices would help India's economy, we shouldn't ignore the geopolitical risks. A divided GCC means weaker collective bargaining power for Gulf states, which could lead to more volatility. India needs to strengthen bilateral deals with both UAE and Saudi Arabia to hedge our bets.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50