India Urges Dialogue on Hormuz Attacks, Stays Neutral on UN Veto

India expressed deep concern over military attacks targeting commercial shipping in the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz, highlighting threats to its energy security and the loss of Indian seafarer lives. At a UN General Assembly meeting, India's Permanent Representative adopted a neutral stance regarding the recent veto by Russia and China of a Security Council resolution demanding Iran halt its attacks. While urging all states to pursue dialogue and de-escalation, India co-sponsored an earlier resolution condemning Iran's attacks, demonstrating a nuanced diplomatic approach. The vetoed resolution and India's position underscore the complex international divisions over how to address escalating tensions in the region.

Key Points: India's Stance on UN Veto Over Hormuz Strait Shipping Attacks

  • Concern over attacks on commercial shipping
  • Neutral stance on UNSC veto
  • Emphasis on freedom of navigation
  • Calls for dialogue and diplomacy
4 min read

India voices concern over Hormuz shipping attacks, takes neutral stance on UNSC resolution veto

India voices concern over attacks on commercial shipping in the Hormuz Strait but takes a neutral position on the UNSC veto by Russia and China. Read more.

"We have urged all states to promote dialogue and diplomacy and de-escalation of tensions - India's Permanent Representative"

United Nations, April 17

While expressing concern over the attacks on commercial shipping in the Hormuz Strait, India has taken a neutral stance on the veto by Russia and China of a Security Council resolution demanding that Iran stop attacks.

Speaking on Thursday at a General Assembly meeting on the veto, India's Permanent Representative skirted the issue and said, "We have urged all states to promote dialogue and diplomacy and de-escalation of tensions, and to purposefully address underlying issues".

"We have also called for respect of sovereignty and territorial integrity of all states", he said.

The meeting was convened under an Assembly process that requires permanent members who veto resolutions to appear before it within ten days to explain their actions.

On April 7, Russia and China vetoed the resolution introduced by Bahrain, an elected member of the Council, to demand that Iran stop attacks on commercial shipping and not impede freedom of navigation.

Moscow and Beijing defended their veto at the Assembly, while the US, Israel and the Gulf States, along with many others, assailed the veto.

In his brief, 90-second, 198-word statement, Harish stayed clear of the two sides but made clear India's position on freedom of navigation in the Strait.

"An aspect of particular concern for India for its energy and economic security relates to commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz", he said.

The Strait is the chokepoint for 20 per cent of global fossil fuel traffic, and its disruption has affected India.

"India has deplored the fact that commercial shipping was made a target of military attacks in this conflict", he added. "The precious lives of Indian seafarers aboard ships have been lost during the course of the conflict".

"We reiterate that the targeting of commercial shipping and endangering innocent civilian crew members, or otherwise impeding the freedom of navigation and commerce in the Strait of Hormuz, are unacceptable. International law in this regard must be fully respected", he said.

While Iran attacked ships in the Strait following the Israel-US attacks on it on February 28, US President Donald Trump imposed a naval blockade of Iranian ports on Monday.

While striking a neutral stance over the vetoes, India had co-sponsored a resolution brought by Bahrain on March 11 condemning "in the strongest terms" Iran's attacks on its neighbours in the Middle East.

Russia and China abstained from voting on that resolution, allowing it to be adopted.

Explaining the veto of the resolution last week, Russia's Deputy Permanent Representative Anna M Evstigneeva said it was one-sided and "turned a blind eye" to the Israeli and US actions that precipitated the conflict.

It would have given an unconditional approval for continuing and escalating the conflict, she said.

China's Permanent Representative Fu Cong said that while Beijing appreciated the major concerns of Bahrain and the Gulf nations, it vetoed the resolution because it would have given a "veneer of legitimacy for unauthorised military operations".

Kuwait's Permanent Representative Tareq M A M Albanai, who spoke on behalf of the Gulf States and Jordan, deplored the veto of the resolution that dealt with "a clear and direct threat to international peace and security".

He said that the Gulf countries will introduce another resolution based on wide-ranging consultations for a consensus.

US Permanent Representative Mike Waltz said China and Russia "deliberately chose to turn a blind eye -- and worse, chose to permit-- Iran's attacks on its neighbours, its terror against its own people, and its death grip that it's attempting to place on the global economy".

He accused Iran of creating a food crisis by preventing critical shipments, including fertilisers, from reaching South Asia in time for the planting season.

"It is clear who chose obstruction over responsibility", he said.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
It's interesting to see India navigate this complex situation. While neutrality might seem like fence-sitting to some, in this case, it's a necessity. We have significant ties with the Gulf, Russia, and the US. A clear condemnation of the veto could have upset important strategic partners.
P
Priyanka N
The most important line is about the "precious lives of Indian seafarers". That's what matters to us ordinary citizens. Our people are getting caught in the crossfire of conflicts we have no part in. The government must ensure their safety above all else. 🙏
R
Rohit P
While I understand the need for strategic neutrality, sometimes a clearer stand is needed. Attacks on commercial shipping are piracy, plain and simple. If 20% of global oil passes through Hormuz, shouldn't there be a stronger collective response to protect it? Just my two paise.
M
Michael C
The US accusation about Iran creating a food crisis in South Asia by blocking fertiliser shipments is very serious. This directly impacts farmers in India and Pakistan. This isn't just about oil; it's about food security for millions.
K
Kavya N
This is classic diplomatic tightrope walking. We condemned Iran's attacks in March, but won't comment on the veto now. It shows our foreign policy is mature and considers the long game, not just the headlines of the day. The focus on dialogue is the only sane approach.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50