India Cites 40 Years of Terror from Pakistan in Indus Treaty Move

India has suspended the Indus Water Treaty following the April 2025 Pahalgam terror attack by a Pakistan-backed group. A British newspaper report highlights that India has faced 40 years of terrorist violence from Pakistani territory. The report cites a US Congressional Research Service finding that at least 15 terrorist outfits operate from Pakistani soil. Pakistan's army chief made nuclear threats, which PM Narendra Modi rejected, stating that "blood and water cannot flow together."

Key Points: India Cites 40 Years of Pakistan Terror in Indus Treaty Move

  • India suspends Indus Water Treaty after Pahalgam terror attack
  • US report documents 15 terrorist outfits operating from Pakistani soil
  • Pakistan army chief made nuclear threats on US soil
  • PM Modi signals nuclear blackmail will no longer be tolerated
2 min read

'India has faced 40 years of terrorist violence from Pakistani soil'

India suspends Indus Water Treaty after Pahalgam attack, citing 40 years of terror from Pakistan. US report notes 15 outfits operating from Pakistani soil.

"Pakistan's breach is not of the treaty's water-sharing clauses. It is of the customary law obligation... not to allow one's territory to be used for acts contrary to the rights of other states - Report in Asian Lite"

London, May 9

India's decision to place the Indus Water Treaty in abeyance following the heinous April 2025 Pahalgam terror attack carried out by Pakistan-backed terror group is widely viewed as a calibrated measure and one of the least disruptive tools available within the global order, a report said on Saturday.

According to a report in British newspaper Asian Lite, over the last four decades, Pakistan has used "non-state violence" as an alternative to conventional military capability against India.

The report cited United States Congressional Research Service findings in March 2026 documenting at least 15 terrorist outfits operating from Pakistani soil, 12 of them US-designated Foreign Terrorist Organisations.

The Resistance Front (TRF), which claimed the Pahalgam terror attack, is the most recent addition, designated by the US State Department on July 17, 2025 as proxy of terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba.

The report noted that the Western international lawyers familiar with Articles 60 and 62 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties - relating to material breach and fundamental change of circumstances - should recognise that India has faced 40 years of terrorist violence emanating from Pakistani territory.

"Pakistan's breach is not of the treaty's water-sharing clauses. It is of the customary law obligation, articulated by the International Court of Justice in the Corfu Channel and Nicaragua jurisprudence, not to allow one's territory to be used for acts contrary to the rights of other states," it added.

Highlighting the escalatory rhetoric from Islamabad since the Pahalgam terror attack, the report said former Pakistani Foreign Minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari twice spoke of war in 2025 if the treaty was not restored. Additionally, on August 10, 2025, Pakistani Army Chief Asim Munir told a diaspora gathering in Florida's Tampa that Pakistan would destroy any future Indian dam with "ten missiles" and was ready to take half the world down with its nuclear weapons.

"That is not a deterrent signalling of the kind Western strategists recognise. It is the open conflation of treaty grievance, conventional asymmetry and nuclear threat, delivered on American soil by a serving army chief," it stressed.

The report emphasised that Prime Minister Narendra Modi's address from the Red Fort on August 15, 2025, made clear that nuclear blackmail would no longer be tolerated and that "blood and water cannot flow together", restoring a clear threshold of Indian deterrent communication. It added that if Western non-proliferation concerns are genuine, focus should be on Rawalpindi rather than pressuring New Delhi.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
The report makes a compelling legal case. If Pakistan has violated customary international law by harboring terrorists, then India's actions are justified under the Vienna Convention. The West needs to recognize this reality.
V
Vikram M
While I support the government's decision, I worry about water scarcity in downstream areas. Hope there are contingency plans for farmers in Punjab and Sindh who depend on this water. Abeyance should be temporary, not permanent.
R
Rohit P
The Pakistani Army Chief threatening to destroy dams with "ten missiles" on US soil shows their desperation. Nuclear blackmail won't work anymore. PM Modi's Red Fort speech was clear: enough is enough. Jai Hind! 🇮🇳
M
Michael C
This is a well-calibrated diplomatic move. By citing international law and US Congressional reports, India has put the ball in the global court. The onus is now on Pakistan to show it can control terrorist groups operating from its territory.
K
Kavya N
Sad that it took 40 years and a horrific attack on innocent tourists in Pahalgam for decisive action. But better late than never. Let's hope this sends a strong message to those who think they can use terrorism as state policy.
D
David E
Interesting legal argument from Western lawyers about the Vienna

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50