India's Rare Earth Potential: Breaking China's Monopoly on Critical Minerals

China's near-monopoly on rare earth elements, controlling over 90% of processing, gives it significant strategic leverage in global supply chains for electric vehicles and defense equipment. India, possessing the world's fifth-largest reserves but dependent on China for 80-90% of its needs, has launched the National Critical Minerals Mission to boost domestic exploration and private investment. The nation's SAGAR and MAHASAGAR doctrines offer a framework for regional cooperation with South Asian neighbors who hold untapped deposits. By leveraging its resources and strategic position, India could develop alternative regional value chains, reducing dependence on a single external power.

Key Points: India's Role in Breaking China's Critical Minerals Monopoly

  • China controls 90% of rare earth processing
  • India holds 5th largest global reserves
  • India launched National Critical Minerals Mission in 2025
  • Regional cooperation could unlock South Asia's deposits
  • Rare earths are central to EV and defense manufacturing
4 min read

'India can play key role in breaking China's near-monopoly on critical minerals'

India holds the world's fifth largest rare earth reserves and can disrupt China's 90% market control, vital for EVs and defense tech.

"India's combination of resource availability, technological capacity, and geopolitical positioning uniquely positions it to lead the development of regional value chains for rare earth extraction and processing. - Dalbir Ahlawat"

New Delhi, March 22

India, which holds the world's fifth largest rare earth reserves and the required technology to produce these minerals, can play a crucial role in breaking China's near-monopoly on these critical minerals required for making electric vehicles, wind turbines, hi-tech electronic goods and defence equipment, according to an article.

The global race for rare earth elements (REEs) has shifted from the margins of industrial policy to the centre of geopolitics. China currently accounts for roughly 90 per cent of rare earth separation and processing, and 93 per cent of magnet manufacturing, according to an article published by the Australian Institute of International Affairs.

This near monopoly has enabled China to use rare earth exports as a strategic leverage. The most cited examples include the 2010 and January 2026 restrictions on shipments to Japan during maritime disputes in the East China Sea, as well as more recent export controls used in negotiations with the United States. As geopolitical tensions deepen, governments and industries are urgently seeking alternative sources of supply, the article by Dalbir Ahlawat pointed out.

India also remains heavily dependent on China for 80-90 per cent of its magnets and related materials. This vulnerability became clear when China tightened exports during a trade dispute, resuming supply only after India provided end-user guarantees that the materials would not be re-exported to the United States, the article states.

Despite its sizeable reserves, India's rare earth sector has long been underdeveloped. Production has been limited and dominated by state-owned enterprises such as Indian Rare Earths Limited, whose regulatory framework historically discouraged private investment. This, in turn, constrained refining capacity and prevented India from fully capitalising on its resource base.

To adapt to ground realities, India launched the National Critical Minerals Mission in January 2025 to expand domestic exploration, processing, and value addition. The government has begun opening critical mineral exploration to private firms while strengthening cooperation with international partners through frameworks such as the Minerals Security Partnership (MSP), which includes the United States, Japan, Australia, and several European countries.

Within South Asia, India occupies a distinctive geostrategic position that is increasingly shaped by competing connectivity initiatives. China's Belt and Road Initiative continue to expand infrastructure and economic linkages, while the US-led Indo-Pacific frameworks seek to build alternative supply chains. In a sense, infrastructure investments, energy corridors, and connectivity projects have become a hallmark of strategic competition in South Asia and the Indian Ocean region. Rare earth resources are increasingly becoming part of broader strategic competition, linking resource security with infrastructure development and regional influence, the article observed.

India's regional initiatives, beginning with the Security and Growth for All in the Region (SAGAR) doctrine and recently expanded into the Mutual and Holistic Advancement for Security and Growth Across Regions (MAHASAGAR), reflect a cooperative approach to regional development. These frameworks emphasise maritime cooperation, disaster relief, sustainable development, and economic connectivity across the Indian Ocean and South Asia. Integrating rare earth supply chains into this framework could open new avenues for collaboration with several regional states possessing deposits of critical minerals: Afghanistan (lanthanum, cerium, neodymium), Bangladesh (monazite, zircon), Myanmar (dysprosium, terbium), Nepal (tantalum, niobium), Bhutan (tungsten, lithium), and Sri Lanka (monazite, zircon). Yet these resources remain largely unexploited due to technological, regulatory, and financial constraints, the article stated.

India's combination of resource availability, technological capacity, and geopolitical positioning uniquely positions it to lead the development of regional value chains for rare earth extraction and processing. By doing so, New Delhi could enable South Asian states to participate more actively in global supply networks while reducing excessive reliance on external powers, the article pointed out.

India has also expanded international cooperation through the MSP framework, complementing broader efforts by partners such as Australia's Lynas Corporation, the United States' Mountain Pass mine, Japan's diversification through overseas partnerships and recycling technologies, and the European Union's Critical Raw Materials Act.

By strengthening domestic capacity, partnering with international producers, and fostering regional cooperation across South Asia, New Delhi can reinforce its broader role as a stabilising force in the region, the article added.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Finally! Being 80-90% dependent on any single country, especially for something so critical, is a huge vulnerability. The incident where China tightened exports should be a permanent wake-up call. We need to empower our private sector and cut the red tape that has stifled this industry for so long.
V
Vikram M
The regional cooperation angle with MAHASAGAR is brilliant. Instead of just competing with China's BRI, we can offer a cooperative model where smaller neighbours like Nepal, Bhutan, and Sri Lanka also benefit from developing their own resources. This is how you build lasting influence and security.
R
Rohit P
Good article, but I hope the execution is better than our past record. State-owned enterprises like IREL have not delivered. We need transparency and real competition. Also, while reducing reliance on China is good, we must ensure our new partnerships with the West don't come with unfair conditions.
S
Sarah B
As someone working in the EV sector, this is crucial news. The entire green transition hinges on these minerals. If India can become a reliable, democratic alternative to China for processed rare earths, it will be a game-changer for global manufacturing and climate goals. The world is watching.
K
Karthik V
It's not just about breaking a monopoly, it's about strategic autonomy. From defence to smartphones, we need control over these supply chains. The mention of Afghanistan and Myanmar's deposits is interesting but also highlights the huge challenges. Geopolitics in our neighbourhood is never simple.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50