India Can Be a Massive Architect in AI, Says Economist Danny Quah

Economist Danny Quah says India can emerge as a massive architect in AI, with unbounded opportunities in technology. He notes Trump’s tariffs are driven by a belief the US was taken advantage of. Quah traces US protectionism to historical figures like Alexander Hamilton, calling recent free trade an aberration. He suggests India pursue mitigation through building multilateral coalitions for a balanced global order.

Key Points: India as AI Architect: Economist Danny Quah

  • India can be a massive architect in AI, leveraging tech strengths
  • Trump’s tariffs driven by belief US was taken advantage of
  • US shift to protectionism rooted in historical tradition
  • India should build multilateral coalitions for sustainable path
3 min read

India can be a massive architect in AI: Economist Danny Quah

Economist Danny Quah says India can emerge as a massive architect in AI, leveraging its tech strengths. He also discusses Trump’s tariffs and India’s global role.

"The opportunity in technology, especially AI, is essentially unbounded... India can be a massive actor in that space. - Danny Quah"

By Vishu Adhana, New Delhi, April 29

Noting that India's strength has been in services and technology, world-renowned Economist Danny Quah on Wednesday said the country can emerge as a "massive architect" in Artificial Intelligence, as opportunities in the sector are "essentially unbounded."

Speaking exclusively to ANI, Quah, Professor in Economics at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore, also said India can play a key role in building coalitions of like-minded countries to deal with what he described as the "disruptive" economic policies of US President Donald Trump.

When asked about India's future and where it should focus, Quah said India should leverage its strengths in technology, high-quality services, and English-language capabilities. "The opportunity in technology, especially AI, is essentially unbounded... India can be a massive actor in that space," he said.

When asked Trump's imposing tariffs on India and other countries, Quah said Trump's policies are driven by the belief that the United States has been "taken advantage of" by the rest of the world and must now "get back" at others. "A lot of his supporters endorse these policies because he crafts them in that way," he said, adding that most neutral observers believe the US has in fact "benefited hugely from the world that it itself created over the last eight decades."

He noted that while the US had long warned against other powers being "revisionist" and disrupting a rules-based global order, "it turns out that it's America that's doing the revisionism." According to Quah, other major economies are adopting a wait-and-watch approach amid the uncertainty generated by Washington's moves.

Quah further pointed out that the US shift towards protectionism is not entirely new but rooted in its historical tradition, tracing it back to figures like Alexander Hamilton and Abraham Lincoln. He said the past eight decades of relatively open trade may have been an "aberration" in a longer trajectory of American economic thinking.

"The question now is whether America will continue returning to that earlier path of protectionism and isolationism, or recognise that being part of the international community has made it stronger," he said, adding that there is still no clear answer on which direction the US will take.

On how India should respond, Quah outlined three possible strategies -- alignment, acquiescence, and mitigation -- noting that blind alignment with the US may not suit a country of India's size and interests. He said acquiescence could offer temporary strategic space, but emphasised that mitigation, through building multilateral coalitions and cooperative systems, would be a more sustainable path.

"India is large enough to help build systems that work for it, alongside others," he said, stressing that New Delhi could play a leading role in shaping a more balanced global order through "coalitions of the willing."

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Loved the three strategies he outlined - alignment, acquiescence, and mitigation. India should definitely go with mitigation through coalition building. We've always been good at that, from NAM to BRICS. And about AI - yes please! But we need to ensure it benefits all Indians, not just the urban elite. Digital divide is real 😕
J
James A
As an American working in tech in Bangalore, I completely agree with Quah. The talent here is incredible. But his point about US protectionism being an "aberration" is spot on. We've been too comfortable assuming free trade is permanent. India should definitely invest in AI for its own strategic needs.
K
Kavya N
Interesting but slightly overhyped. We keep hearing "India can be a leader in X" every few years - IT, manufacturing, now AI. Yes, we have strengths, but ground reality is different. Our universities are underfunded, research is patchy, and we still struggle with basic infrastructure. Let's get the fundamentals right first. #JustSaying 😅
S
Sarah B
Quah's analysis of Trump's tariffs is refreshingly honest. The US has benefited from the system it created, and now it's being "revisionist" - that's rich coming from the architect of the rules-based order! India should definitely build coalitions. We can't just align with a US that's becoming unpredictable.
V
Vikram M
While AI is promising, let's not ignore the darker side. Automation could displace millions of service sector jobs in India. We need a social safety net and reskilling programs alongside AI push. As for trade, building

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50