India Demands UN Security Council Reform, Warns Multilateralism Under Strain

India has issued a strong call for comprehensive reform of the United Nations Security Council, arguing its current structure is outdated. Ambassador Harish Parvathaneni warned that multilateralism is under significant strain due to institutional paralysis and ineffectiveness in addressing conflicts. He emphasized that the international rule of law must be enforceable and shift from abstract concepts to pragmatic solutions that impact citizens' lives. The envoy cautioned against the misuse of international law to interfere in state sovereignty, stating its application must be consistent and free of double standards.

Key Points: India Urges UNSC Reform, Says Multilateralism Under Strain

  • Calls for UNSC expansion
  • Warns multilateralism is under strain
  • Criticizes paralysis in conflict resolution
  • Stresses rule of law must be enforceable
4 min read

India calls for urgent UNSC reforms, warns multilateralism under strain amid shifting global dynamics

India calls for urgent UN Security Council reforms, warning current structure reflects a "bygone era" and that multilateralism is under significant strain.

"The current architecture of the United Nations, particularly the composition of the Security Council, reflects a geopolitical reality of a bygone era. - Ambassador Harish Parvathaneni"

New York, January 27

India on Monday called for comprehensive reforms of the United Nations Security Council on grounds of multilateralism and changes in global dynamics, noting that the current structure reflects a "geopolitical reality of a bygone era".

Speaking at the UN Security Council Open Debate on "Reaffirming International Rule of Law: Pathways to Reinvigorating Peace, Justice, and Multilateralism", India's Permanent Representative to the UN, Ambassador Harish Parvathaneni argued that the credibility of multilateralism and the international rule of law depends on adapting global governance structures to contemporary geopolitical realities.

"The Rule of law is at the very heart of the core mandate of the United Nations Security Council - maintenance of international peace and security. It is critical to addressing conflicts and fostering trust among member states," the Ambassador said.

He noted that multilateralism based on universal membership, with the UN at its core, is under significant strain.

Beyond budgetary challenges, he pointed to paralysis and lack of effectiveness in addressing conflicts as major shortcomings, leading to a growing perception that the UN is failing to deliver on its primary mandate of maintaining international peace and security, warning that this trend risks further weakening multilateral institutions.

Ambassador Parvathaneni emphasised that the rule of law lies at the heart of the Security Council's mandate but stressed that it cannot remain theoretical, while calling for a shift from abstract legal constructs to pragmatic solutions that deliver tangible outcomes for people.

"The rule of law is barren without enforceability. The focus must shift from arcane constructs to pragmatic solutions and outcomes that positively impact the daily lives of our citizens," the Ambassador said.

Highlighting the rapid transformation across political, economic, and technological domains, he underscored the need for continuous review and updating of international legal and institutional frameworks to prevent obsolescence, arguing that for multilateralism and international rule of law to remain effective and credible, global governance structures must evolve in line with changing power dynamics, demographics, and global challenges.

"Continuous review, updation and reinvigoration are an imperative to avoid obsolescence," he stated.

Parvathaneni reiterated India's long-standing position that reform of the Security Council must include expansion in both permanent and non-permanent categories to enhance its legitimacy, representativeness, and effectiveness.

"For multilateralism and international rule of law to remain effective and credible, global governance structures must evolve to reflect contemporary realities. The current architecture of the United Nations, particularly the composition of the Security Council, reflects a geopolitical reality of a bygone era," he noted.

"In light of the profound global transformation of the last eight decades in power dynamics, demographics, and the nature of global challenges, there is an urgent and compelling need to undertake comprehensive reform, including expansion in the permanent and non-permanent categories," he added.

The Indian envoy also called for greater synergy among the UN's principal organs to advance the rule of law, advocating process-oriented reforms, predictable and adequate resources, capacity-building, and technical assistance tailored to local contexts.

At the same time, he cautioned against the misuse of international law to interfere in the internal affairs of states or undermine their sovereignty and territorial integrity. Stressing the need for adaptability, he warned that rigid and selective application of international legal principles could accelerate the emergence of alternative formats of global engagement.

"International rule of law should not be weaponised to question state sovereignty and interfere in internal affairs of states," he said.

Concluding his remarks, Ambassador Parvathaneni emphasised that the application of international rule of law must be consistent, objective, and free from double standards if the United Nations is to retain its relevance and authority in a rapidly changing world.

"The application of international rule of law calls for consistency, objectivity and predictability with no double standards," the ambassador concluded.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As an observer, I find the Indian position very reasonable. The world has changed dramatically. The current system creates paralysis, as we've seen in recent conflicts. A more representative council would have more legitimacy to enforce international law.
V
Vikram M
The point about "rule of law is barren without enforceability" hits home. We see powerful nations breaking rules with impunity while others are held to different standards. The UN needs teeth, and that starts with a council that represents the 21st century, not the post-WWII era.
P
Priya S
While I agree with the need for reform, I hope India's push isn't seen as just about getting a permanent seat for itself. The reform must be comprehensive and truly democratic, giving a voice to Africa, Latin America, and smaller nations too. The solution should be for all, not just a few emerging powers.
R
Rohit P
Absolutely correct! The warning about "alternative formats of global engagement" is crucial. If the UN doesn't reform, countries will simply start forming their own blocs and forums, making the UN irrelevant. BRICS is already a sign of that. The time for talk is over, we need action.
M
Michael C
The ambassador's caution against using international law to interfere in internal affairs is a critical point, often overlooked in Western discourse. Sovereignty matters. Reform should strengthen collective security, not become a tool for geopolitical maneuvering by the powerful.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50