India's Calm Approach Wins US Trade Deal, Says CSIS Expert Rossow

CSIS senior advisor Richard Rossow praised India's calm and non-escalatory approach to recent US trade pressure, contrasting it with previous tariff wars during Trump's last term. He highlighted that the US wanted commitments to buy American goods and agricultural market access, with India firmly protecting staple grains. The resulting deal appears to grant the US better market access into India, including lowered tariffs and reduced non-tariff barriers. Rossow also noted India's compliance on energy purchases when faced with real threats, underscoring the importance of the US as India's key export market.

Key Points: India-US Trade Deal: Calm Strategy Wins Market Access

  • India avoided escalating trade tensions
  • US sought to repair trade deficit with India
  • Agriculture remained a key red line for India
  • Deal includes better US market access into India
3 min read

"India approached US with calm head," CSIS Richard Rossow on India-US trade deal

CSIS expert Richard Rossow explains how India's calm negotiation secured a US trade deal, avoiding escalation and gaining tariff reductions.

"This time, India didn't fight back. They put their head down, kept negotiating, and tried to comply. - Richard Rossow"

Washington DC, February 3

Senior Advisor at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Richard Rossow lauded the calmness with which India approached the US tariffs and kept its stance that agriculture is a no-go.

Rossow, in a conversation with ANI, highlighted how the US wanted to repair the trade deficit with India, and despite warm relations, there was a bit of ruffle.

He said, "First, the US wanted India to commit to buying a certain percentage of American goods to help repair the trade deficit, which is currently about two to one in deficit with India. The second thing was agricultural market access. For India, certain staple grains are a no-go... For the US, the question was whether this was a negotiating tactic or a real red line. We will see that staple grains grown in India were likely excluded from the market..."

Rossow added that when the US hit India with tariffs, India too retaliated with its own tariffs in US President Donald Trump's last term.

He said, "At the end of the day, India approached the US pressure with a calm head. The last time President Trump was in office, there was a medium-intensity trade war. The US hit India with tariffs on steel and aluminium, revoked India's trade preferences under the GSP program, and India retaliated with its own tariffs. Despite a warm relationship between the leaders, there was significant conflict on both sides," he said.

Rossow said that this time India did not escalate the situation.

"This time, India didn't fight back. They put their head down, kept negotiating, and tried to comply. So, first and foremost, credit goes to India for choosing not to escalate the situation. A substantial change in recent months was President Trump nominating his personal advisor, Sergio Gor, as ambassador to India," he said.

Rossow said that from the looks of it, India and the US agreed for the latter to get a larger market access.

He said, "It looks like both sides have agreed for the US to get better market access into India, including dropping non-tariff barriers, as President Trump mentioned, and also removing most of the tariffs that the US had placed on India... What we don't know is what other things were included. There's also the agreement that India will buy USD 500 billion worth of American goods, but we don't know the details of that or the time frame."

On Indian purchase of Russian oil, Rossow said that previously when the US pressured India about its purchases from Venezuela and Iran, India complied only because it presented a real threat.

He said, "The previous times the US pressured India about where it was buying hydrocarbons, most notably from Venezuela and Iran, India complied when the US presented a real threat... From India's perspective, the US is by far its most important export market in both goods and services... India got tariffs reduced in exchange for market access, which India has done with other trade partners. It's a deal both leaders thought was worth finalising."

The remarks came following the announcement of the US-India trade deal, in which Washington reduced the tariffs on India to 18 per cent.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
Good to see agriculture being a firm red line. Our farmers' livelihoods and food security cannot be compromised for any trade deal. The $500 billion purchase commitment sounds huge though, hope the details are favorable for us.
M
Michael C
As an observer, India's pragmatic foreign policy is impressive. Balancing relations with the US while maintaining strategic autonomy (like with Russian oil) is a difficult act. This deal seems like a win for stability.
R
Rohit P
Reducing tariffs to 18% is a positive step. Should help our IT and pharma sectors. But we must ensure our MSMEs are not negatively impacted by increased US market access. "Calm head" is good, but vigilance is key.
S
Sarah B
The point about India complying only when there's a "real threat" is telling. It shows a clear-eyed assessment of national interest. Not escalating unnecessarily this time was a smart diplomatic move.
K
Karthik V
While the calm approach is praised, I hope we didn't concede too much. The US always plays hardball. The devil is in the details of that $500 billion purchase agreement. We need transparency on what we are committing to buy.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50