Maharashtra Polls: SEC Denies Ink Irregularity, Says Same as ECI's

Maharashtra State Election Commissioner D T Waghmare has firmly rejected allegations of irregularities concerning the indelible ink used in the ongoing municipal corporation elections. He clarified that the ink is identical to that used by the Election Commission of India, with the only difference being its application via a marker, a practice in place since 2011. Waghmare emphasized that the ink dries quickly and that multiple verification steps by candidate representatives and polling officers prevent any manipulation. The statement comes amid criticism from opposition leaders, including Uddhav Thackeray, who raised concerns about the ink and other electoral processes.

Key Points: Maharashtra Civic Polls: SEC Rejects Ink Irregularity Claims

  • SEC denies erasable ink allegations
  • Ink is same as used by ECI
  • Only difference is marker form since 2011
  • Safeguards in place during drying period
3 min read

Indelible ink used in Maharashtra civic polls same as ECI, no irregularity: State Election Commissioner

State Election Commissioner D T Waghmare clarifies indelible ink used is the same as ECI's, dismissing opposition allegations of irregularities.

"The ink being used... is the same ink which is used by the Election Commission of India - D T Waghmare"

Mumbai, January 15

Maharashtra State Election Commissioner D T Waghmare on Thursday firmly rejected allegations of irregularities related to the indelible ink being used in the ongoing Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Elections 2026, asserting that there was no wrongdoing in the polling process.

Responding to concerns raised by opposition leaders over the ink used allegedly being erasable, Waghmare said there was deliberate creation of confusion. "This has come to our notice that there is some confusion being created about the ink which is being put on the voters' fingers. I want to say that the ink being used to mark the fingers of voters is indelible ink, and it is the same ink which is used by the Election Commission of India in various elections," the State Election Commissioner said.

Clarifying the difference in its application, Waghmare explained that the only variation was the use of the ink in marker form. "The only difference which is seen here is it is being used in the form of a marker. But I also want to say that this marker form of indelible ink has been in use since 2011," the election official added, dismissing allegations suggesting manipulation.

He further stated that the ink dries quickly and that adequate safeguards are in place during this period. "This ink gets dried up within 12 to 15 seconds of being applied, and during this period, any voter remains in the polling booth itself, and even if someone tries to erase it, there are other checks and balances," he said.

Waghmare emphasised that representatives of candidates verify each voter before voting is allowed. "The representatives of the candidates identify each and every voter, and only then is he allowed to proceed for voting, and the presiding officer also ensures that no one is coming without proper verification or authorisation for casting his or her vote," he added.

The clarification comes amid sharp criticism from Shiv Sena (UBT) chief and former Maharashtra Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray, who alleged missing names in voter lists, use of old EVMs and claimed that the ink could be wiped off, calling it a threat to democracy.

Polling for civic body elections began across 29 municipal corporations in Maharashtra this monring. According to the State Election Commission, voter turnout stood at 29.22 per cent till 1:30 pm after a sluggish start earlier in the day.

The elections are crucial for major urban centres including Mumbai, Pune, Nagpur, Thane, Navi Mumbai, Nashik and Pimpri-Chinchwad, with vote counting scheduled for January 16.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
While I appreciate the explanation, the timing is suspicious. Why wait for allegations to surface before clarifying? Transparency should be proactive, not reactive. The low voter turnout itself speaks volumes about public trust.
R
Rohit P
The real issue is missing names from voter lists and old EVMs, not just the ink. The SEC should address all concerns comprehensively. Our democracy's strength lies in flawless elections. Jai Hind!
S
Sarah B
As an observer, the technical details are reassuring. If the ink dries in 15 seconds and the voter is still in the booth under supervision, the chance of tampering seems minimal. The checks described sound robust.
V
Vikram M
Baseless allegations before every election have become a trend. It undermines the hard work of election officials. We voted in Pune today, process was smooth. Focus should be on the 29% turnout – that's the actual problem!
K
Kavya N
Marker form is actually more convenient and less messy than the bottle-brush method. Innovation in election process is welcome. Hope the counting tomorrow is fair and peaceful. 🤞

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50