Trump Questions NATO Loyalty, Demands Greenland in Davos Speech

US President Donald Trump used a speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos to publicly question whether NATO allies would come to America's defense if needed. He directly linked these doubts to his renewed push for the United States to acquire full ownership of Greenland, an autonomous territory of Denmark. Trump demanded "immediate negotiations" for the acquisition, arguing that only the US could properly secure and develop the Arctic island. He criticized Denmark's historical role and framed US control as a benefit to the NATO alliance's overall security.

Key Points: Trump Doubts NATO, Pushes for Greenland at Davos

  • Trump questions NATO's mutual defense commitment
  • Links alliance doubts to push for Greenland acquisition
  • Demands "immediate negotiations" for US ownership
  • Criticizes Denmark as "ungrateful"
  • Argues US control would strengthen NATO
5 min read

"I'm not sure that they'll be there for us": Trump questions NATO commitment at Davos

President Trump questions if NATO allies would defend the US and renews his push for US ownership of Greenland in a speech at Davos.

"I'm not sure that they'll be there for us. - Donald Trump"

Davos, January 21

US President Donald Trump on Wednesday again questioned NATO's commitment to defending the United States, asking whether the transatlantic alliance would "be there for us," during a speech in Davos.

"The problem with NATO is that we'll be there for them 100%," Trump said. "But I'm not sure that they'll be there for us."

Trump has increasingly questioned the alliance's reliability amid his push for ownership of Greenland and objections raised by European allies over the US taking over the Danish territory.

During remarks linked to his drive to acquire Greenland, Trump issued what he described as a choice for NATO members.

"They have a choice," he said. "You can say yes, and we will be very appreciative, or you can say no and we will remember."

A key principle of the NATO alliance is Article 5, under which all members agree to come to the defense of any member state if it is attacked. Article 5 has been invoked once, by the United States after the September 11, 2001, terror attacks.

Despite that history, Trump reiterated his doubts about whether allies would support the US in return.

"I know them all very well, I'm not sure that they'd be there," he said. "With all the money we expend, with all the blood, sweat and tears, I don't know that they'd be there for us."

Trump's comments on NATO came alongside renewed focus on Greenland, where he asserted he would not use force to acquire the Arctic island even as he pressed for US control during his address at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos.

"We probably won't get anything unless I decide to use excessive strength and force, where we would be, frankly, unstoppable," Trump said. "But I won't do that. Okay. Now everyone says, oh, good."

Trump said his remarks were aimed at addressing speculation over the possible use of military power.

"That's probably the biggest statement I made, because people thought I would use force. I don't have to use force. I don't want to use force. I won't use force," he said.

Reiterating his demand for control of Greenland, Trump said, "All the United States is asking for is a place called Greenland."

He later underlined that he envisioned full US ownership of Greenland rather than an expanded agreement.

"All we're asking for is to get Greenland, including right title and ownership, because you need the ownership to defend it," Trump said. "You can't defend it on a lease."

Calling for talks with European allies, Trump urged "immediate negotiations" on a potential US acquisition of Greenland, which is an autonomous territory of Denmark, a NATO member.

Laying out what he described as the strategic case for the move, Trump said, "It's the United States alone that can protect this giant mass of land, this giant piece of ice, develop it and improve it and make it so that it's good for Europe and safe for Europe and good for us."

"And that's the reason I'm seeking immediate negotiations to once again discuss the acquisition of Greenland by the United States, just as we have acquired many other territories throughout our history, as many of the European nations have," he added.

Trump also argued that US control of Greenland would strengthen the NATO alliance.

"This would not be a threat to NATO. This would greatly enhance the security of the entire alliance, the NATO alliance," he said, adding that he believes the US has been "treated very unfairly by NATO."

Reiterating his demand for control of Greenland, Trump said "no nation or group of nations is in any position to be able to secure Greenland, other than the United States."

"Every NATO ally has an obligation to be able to defend their own territory," he said. "We're a great power, much greater than people even understand."

Trump also criticised Denmark over Greenland, calling it "ungrateful" and linking his remarks to World War II-era events.

"Denmark fell to Germany after just six hours of fighting, and was totally unable to defend either itself or Greenland. So the United States was then compelled, and we did it," Trump said, while referring to the US role in defending the territory.

Lamenting the US decision at the time to allow Denmark to retain Greenland as a territory, Trump said, "How stupid were we to do that?"

"But we did it, but we gave it back. But how ungrateful are they now?" he added.

Trump's remarks came as Greenland continued to dominate diplomatic conversations at Davos, with his push to acquire the autonomous territory opening one of the biggest rifts between Washington and its western allies in decades. Trump earlier said he would hold a number of meetings on Greenland at the summit.

Asked how far he was prepared to go to acquire Greenland from Denmark, a fellow NATO member, Trump told reporters, "You'll find out."

As allies responded to Trump's claims, NATO chief Mark Rutte said on Wednesday that "thoughtful diplomacy" was needed as tensions rise within the alliance.

"There are these tensions at the moment, there's no doubt," Rutte said.

France also called for a NATO exercise in Greenland and said it was ready to contribute, Macron's office said.

Greenland's Prime Minister said on Tuesday that the island's population of 57,000 must be prepared for military force.

Trump's appearance at Davos followed a delayed arrival in Switzerland earlier in the day, after Air Force One was forced to turn back following takeoff due to what was described as a "minor electrical issue", requiring an aircraft change.

He later landed in Zurich a few hours behind schedule before travelling onward to Davos, arriving as his engagement with world leaders was being closely watched amid mounting pushback from allies over his bid to seize control of mineral-rich Greenland, a move described as having the potential to shake the global order.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The talk about acquiring Greenland is straight out of a colonial playbook. How can you just demand to "get" a territory and its people in the 21st century? It's disrespectful to the 57,000 people living there. The world has moved on from this kind of thinking. 🤦‍♀️
R
Rohit P
From an Indian strategic perspective, a weakened NATO could shift global power dynamics. It might create a vacuum that other powers try to fill. India needs to watch this closely and ensure its own partnerships are solid and not based on such unpredictable demands.
S
Sarah B
While I understand the desire for allies to contribute their fair share, publicly doubting Article 5 after it was invoked for America after 9/11 seems harsh. Alliances are built on trust, not just money. This rhetoric makes the world a more uncertain place for everyone.
V
Vikram M
Calling Denmark "ungrateful" and referencing WWII is in poor taste. Every country has its sovereignty. The US has been a leader, but leadership isn't about bullying friends. This kind of talk damages America's soft power, which was its greatest asset.
M
Michael C
The strategic importance of the Arctic is clear, but the approach matters. "You'll find out" is not a diplomatic answer. It creates needless tension. There are established channels for such discussions. This volatility is bad for business and global markets we all depend on.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50