Trump Calls Iran’s New Peace Proposal Unsatisfactory, Doubts Deal

US President Donald Trump expressed dissatisfaction with Iran's latest proposal to end the West Asia conflict, casting doubt on whether a final agreement can be reached. He pointed to internal divisions within Iran's leadership, describing it as "disjointed" and "messed up." Iran submitted its new proposal through Pakistan, responding to US amendments that include a ban on transferring enriched uranium from bombed nuclear facilities. Meanwhile, tensions in Tehran have escalated, with President Pezeshkian and Speaker Ghalibaf reportedly seeking the removal of Foreign Minister Araghchi for allegedly bypassing the presidency to follow Revolutionary Guard directives.

Key Points: Trump: Iran's Proposal Unsatisfactory, Deal Uncertain

  • Trump dissatisfied with Iran's latest proposal
  • Doubts if final deal will be reached
  • Cites disjointed Iranian leadership
  • Proposal submitted via Pakistan mediator
  • Internal rift between Pezeshkian, Ghalibaf, and Araghchi
3 min read

"I'm not satisfied": Trump on Iran's new proposal to end war, says "not sure" if deal be reached

President Trump expresses dissatisfaction with Iran's latest proposal to end the West Asia conflict, citing internal divisions and uncertain prospects for a final agreement.

"They want to make a deal, but I'm not satisfied with it, so we'll see what happens. - Donald Trump"

Washington DC, May 1

US President Donald Trump on Friday expressed dissatisfaction with Iran's latest proposal aimed at ending the ongoing conflict, while also casting doubt on whether a final agreement can be reached.

Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump said, "They want to make a deal, but I'm not satisfied with it, so we'll see what happens."

He did not elaborate on the specific aspects of the proposal he found unacceptable but indicated uncertainty over Tehran's willingness to ultimately agree to a settlement.

"They've made strides, but I'm not sure if they ever get there," Trump added, while speaking on the White House's South Lawn.

The US President also pointed to internal divisions within Iran's leadership, suggesting that disunity could be affecting the negotiation process.

"The leadership is very disjointed. It's got two to three groups, maybe four, and it's a very disjointed leadership. And with that being said, they all want to make a deal, but they're all messed up," the US President said.

His remarks come after Iran submitted its latest proposal aimed at advancing negotiations to end the ongoing West Asia conflict with the US, in response to recent amendments introduced by Washington to a draft plan aimed at ending the conflict.

According to Axios, citing sources familiar with the matter, the latest proposal submitted by Iran through Pakistan, which is acting as a mediator in the talks, comes after US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff sent a list of amendments on Monday, focusing on reintroducing the nuclear issue into the draft framework.

Earlier, the Iranian state media IRNA reported that Tehran had submitted its latest proposal aimed at advancing negotiations to end the ongoing West Asia conflict with the US.

Tehran handed over the text of its new proposal to Pakistan on Thursday evening, though details of Tehran's counter-terms have not been fully disclosed.

Axios, citing the source, further reported that one of the proposed US amendments calls for Iran to commit that it will not transfer any enriched uranium from its bombed nuclear facilities or restart any nuclear-related activities at those sites while negotiations are ongoing.

Meanwhile, tensions within the Iranian leadership have reached a critical point as Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf reportedly seek the removal of Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi.

According to Iran International, a UK-based media outlet focused on Iranian affairs, the two leaders have accused Araghchi of bypassing the presidency to follow directives from Iran's Revolutionary Guard.

The discord stems from allegations that Araghchi has acted less as a cabinet minister and more as an aide to Ahmad Vahidi, the commander of the Revolutionary Guards.

Sources familiar with the matter indicated that the Foreign Minister has been operating in full coordination with Vahidi, allegedly implementing policies based on his directives without keeping President Pezeshkian informed.

This internal rift has caused deep dissatisfaction for Pezeshkian, who has reportedly expressed to those in his inner circle that he will dismiss Araghchi if the current situation persists.

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
I'm a bit skeptical of Trump's 'disjointed leadership' comment – sounds like he's trying to weaken Iran's negotiating position by pointing out their internal fights. But the nuclear issue is scary; if Iran restarts enrichment while talks are on, that's a red flag for the whole world. India's been friends with Iran historically (Chabahar port, oil imports), so we need a stable outcome here. Hope Pakistan doesn't play games as mediator. 🙏
R
Rohit P
Honestly, this whole situation is a mess. Iran's Foreign Minister acting more like a Revolutionary Guard aide than a diplomat? That's a recipe for disaster. Trump might be right about the disunity, but let's not forget America's own record in West Asia – Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. India should stay neutral but ready – if conflict escalates, our oil imports could be hit, and we've got 8 million Indians in the Gulf. Jugaad diplomacy needed here. 😅
E
Emma D
Trump's 'messed up' comment about Iran's leadership is a bit crude but not entirely wrong. With President Pezeshkian wanting to sack his own FM, and Revolutionary Guard calling shots, it's like a soap opera! The nuclear amendment – no enrichment during talks – is a smart safeguard, but will Iran accept? India should use its good relations with both US and Iran to quietly push for de-escalation. West Asia stability is in our national interest. 🇮🇳
P
Priya S
I find it ironic that Trump says 'they all want to make a deal' but then calls them 'messed up' – which is it? The nuclear enrichment ban is critical though; if Iran restarts, it could trigger a regional arms race (Saudi, UAE, Turkey all waiting). India must ensure our strategic interests – Chabahar, oil, and diaspora safety – aren't collateral damage. Also, why is Pakistan

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50