White House Eyes Greenland to Counter Russia and China in Arctic

The White House confirmed that the potential acquisition of Greenland remains under active discussion, framing it as a long-standing strategic interest for U.S. national security. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated President Trump views the territory as critical to countering Russian and Chinese activity in the Arctic region. While diplomacy is the preferred path, Leavitt did not rule out any options, including military ones, stressing all choices are on the table. The strategic importance of Greenland has grown due to new Arctic shipping routes and access to resources opened by climate change.

Key Points: US Eyes Greenland to Deter Russia, China in Arctic

  • Greenland acquisition under active discussion
  • Framed as critical for US national security
  • Aimed at deterring Russia and China
  • All options, including military, on the table
3 min read

Greenland critical to deter Russian and Chinese activity in the Arctic: White House

White House confirms active discussions on Greenland acquisition, calling it critical for national security to counter Russian and Chinese Arctic activity.

"He views it in the best interest of the United States to deter Russian and Chinese aggression in the Arctic region. - Karoline Leavitt"

Washington, Jan 8

The White House on Wednesday said the possible acquisition of Greenland remains under active discussion, framing the Arctic territory as strategically vital to US national security and to deterring the activities of Russia and China.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said President Donald Trump views Greenland as critical to countering Russian and Chinese activity in the Arctic region.

"The acquisition of Greenland by the United States is not a new idea," Leavitt told reporters. "This is something that Presidents dating back to the 1800s, have said is advantageous for America's national security."

Leavitt said the president has been clear that Arctic security is now a growing priority.

"He views it in the best interest of the United States to deter Russian and Chinese aggression in the Arctic region," she said.

Asked whether the administration was considering financial terms for such a move, Leavitt confirmed discussions were ongoing but did not provide details.

"That's something that's currently being actively discussed by the President and his national security team," she said.

Leavitt declined to rule out any options, including military ones, stressing that Trump does not publicly limit his strategic choices.

"All options are always on the table for President Trump as he examines what's in the best interest of the United States," she said.

She added, however, that diplomacy remained the administration's preferred path.

"The President's first option always has been diplomacy," Leavitt said.

When pressed on whether Trump recognises Denmark's sovereignty over Greenland, Leavitt said she had not heard him personally challenge it.

"I have not heard him question it personally," she said, adding that reporters could raise the issue directly with the president.

Leavitt rejected suggestions that diplomatic engagement with Denmark was not taking place.

"Who said diplomacy isn't taking place behind the scenes?" she asked. "The President is interested in diplomacy. His national security team is as well."

She said Trump's approach was to be direct about U.S. interests while keeping negotiations private.

"He's always willing to pick up the phone," she said, "but the President is the President of the United States of America, and he's always going to be very clear about what he views as being in our nation's best interest."

Leavitt said increased control in the Arctic would offer advantages beyond military positioning.

"More control over the Arctic region," she said, was necessary to ensure that "China and Russia and our adversaries cannot continue their aggression in this very important and strategic region."

The White House has repeatedly emphasised that strategic geography plays a growing role in U.S. security planning, particularly as climate change opens new Arctic shipping routes and access to natural resources.

Greenland, an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, has gained attention for its location, mineral potential and proximity to major Arctic corridors.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
The idea of buying a territory in the 21st century feels so colonial. What about the people of Greenland? Do they get a say? The world should be moving towards cooperation, not this old-style land acquisition. It's concerning.
A
Aditya G
Strategically, it makes sense for the US to secure its position. China's Belt and Road ambitions are everywhere, and Russia is always expanding. If India wants to be a global player, we need to understand these moves. Our foreign policy experts should be watching this closely.
S
Sarah B
As someone living in India, I see this as a distant power struggle. But the underlying issue is climate change opening the Arctic. That affects us all through weather patterns. The focus should be on the climate crisis, not just who controls the new shipping routes. 🌍
K
Karthik V
"All options are on the table" including military? This is reckless talk. Diplomacy should be the only path. The world doesn't need more tension. India has always stood for peaceful resolution of disputes. The US should remember that.
M
Meera T
The minerals and new trade routes are the real prize. It's an economic play disguised as security. While they fight over Greenland, India should accelerate its own Arctic research program and build strong ties with all nations involved, including Denmark. Smart diplomacy is key.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50