Kerala CM Defends Speaker, Says Governor's Letter on Policy Address Not for Consideration

Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan clarified the government's position that the Governor's letters regarding his edited version of the policy address do not require the Assembly's consideration. He asserted that the policy address reflects the government's policies and the Governor performs a constitutionally mandated duty on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers. Vijayan cited historical precedents where Governors read abbreviated addresses, but the full Cabinet-approved text was always recorded. He concluded that the established constitutional tradition must be upheld, leaving no reason to consider the Governor's demand.

Key Points: Kerala CM: Governor's Policy Address Letter Doesn't Need Consideration

  • Governor demanded edited address be placed
  • CM cites constitutional mandate
  • Speaker backed government's stand
  • Precedents from 1982 and 2024 cited
3 min read

"Governor's letter to Speaker does not require consideration," Kerala CM Pinarayi Vijaya on Governor's demand to place his address before house

Kerala CM Pinarayi Vijayan clarifies constitutional position, says Governor's demand to place his edited policy address before Assembly requires no consideration.

"The Governor's letter to the Speaker does not require consideration. - Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan"

Thiruvananthapuram, February 24

Kerala Assembly Speaker A.N. Shamseer on Tuesday informed the Kerala Assembly about the Governor's letters concerning the policy address delivered on January 20, 2026, following which Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan clarified the government's position, stressing that the correspondence does not require consideration.

Speaker A.N. Shamseer said, "The Governor has informed the House that the Assembly passed a resolution on January 28, 2026, expressing thanks for the policy address delivered by him on January 20, 2026. He has described this response from the Assembly as a commendable act. Under Rule 15(8), I am reporting this to the House."

He further noted, "The letters submitted by the Governor, addressed to the Speaker on January 26 and February 3, stated that the policy address he delivered on January 20, 2026, should remain exactly as presented. Based on constitutional provisions, Assembly rules, established precedents, and Supreme Court judgments, a detailed reply was sent to the Governor on February 9, 2026. Copies of all related correspondence have been circulated to members. Since the Governor has repeatedly requested that his letters regarding the policy address be placed before the House, the matter is now being left for the Assembly to decide."

Furthermore, Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan said, "I wish to clarify the context in which the Governor's letters regarding the policy address and the Speaker's reply have come before the House. Under Article 176 of the Constitution, the policy address presented before the Assembly reflects the policies of 'my government'. The Governor performs this constitutionally mandated duty based on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers."

He added, "Speakers have consistently ruled that the policy address approved by the Cabinet must form part of the official records exactly as it is. This time, when the draft of the policy address was sent, the Governor did not convey any objection or suggestion, neither through a letter nor through any other communication. Never before has a Governor unilaterally edited and delivered the policy address approved by the Cabinet. Such an action has no place in the parliamentary system. On the very day this happened, I informed the House and explained the government's position. The Speaker also concurred with the constitutional and procedural stand of the government and issued a ruling accordingly."

Vijayan cited precedents to reinforce the government's stance. "The Governor now appears to be asking that the version he read, and the reasons he claims, should be placed before the House. However, if we examine precedents, similar situations have occurred earlier. In 1982, Governor Jyothi Venkatachalam read only six minutes of the address. In January 2024-25, Governor Arif Mohammed Khan read only a one-minute version, just the opening and concluding lines. If the current demand is accepted, the records of those earlier addresses would have to be altered to include only the portions they actually read. But the established practice has always been to place the entire Cabinet-approved policy address in the Assembly records, irrespective of what portion the Governor reads. This is what the Indian Constitution, court judgments, Parliament, and other state legislatures follow. There is no reason to deviate from this constitutional tradition."

He concluded, "Therefore, I must inform the House that the Governor's letter to the Speaker does not require consideration."

- ANI

Share this article:

Reader Comments

A
Ananya R
While I support the constitutional position, the language from both sides could be more respectful. The Governor is a constitutional head. There must be a way to resolve these disputes without public spats that undermine institutions. 🤝
R
Rohit P
Full support to CM Vijayan! The precedent cited is clear. Why is the Governor trying to change established practice? This looks more like political interference than a constitutional concern. Kerala's assembly traditions must be upheld.
M
Michael C
As an observer, this is a fascinating case study in Indian federalism. The CM's detailed historical argument is very strong. The rule of law and precedent must prevail over individual interpretation of the role.
P
Priya S
The Governor should have raised objections when the draft was sent, not after delivering it. That's the basic procedure. Changing the address unilaterally sets a dangerous precedent for all states. CM is right to stand firm.
K
Karthik V
This is becoming a yearly drama in Kerala. So much time and energy wasted. Can't they sort this out privately? The public wants development work, not these constitutional battles every session. 🙄

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50