Neeraj Pandey Drops 'Ghooskhor Pandat' Title, Assures SC Film Hurts No Sentiments

Filmmaker Neeraj Pandey has submitted an affidavit to the Supreme Court stating the controversial title 'Ghooskhor Pandat' has been unequivocally withdrawn. He categorically denied any intention to outrage religious feelings, asserting the film is a fictional police drama that does not insult any community. The affidavit follows strong observations from the Supreme Court, which stated free speech cannot license denigrating a section of society. The court had earlier indicated the film would not be allowed to release unless its title was changed.

Key Points: Filmmaker Neeraj Pandey Withdraws 'Ghooskhor Pandat' Title in SC

  • Title 'Ghooskhor Pandat' withdrawn
  • Film is a fictional police drama
  • Supreme Court had warned against denigration
  • Producer denies malicious intent
  • Promotional material was pulled earlier
4 min read

'Ghooskhor Pandat' title dropped; no insult to religion, community: Neeraj Pandey in SC

Filmmaker Neeraj Pandey tells Supreme Court the title 'Ghooskhor Pandat' is withdrawn, affirms film is a fictional drama that insults no religion or community.

"Freedom of speech and expression does not mean you can portray a community in a bad light - Supreme Court Bench"

New Delhi, Feb 19

Filmmaker Neeraj Pandey has filed an affidavit before the Supreme Court stating that the controversial title of the upcoming film, earlier titled 'Ghooskhor Pandat', has been "unequivocally withdrawn" and assuring that the movie does not insult or target any religion or community.

Denying allegations of hurting religious sentiments, the producer submitted: "I state categorically and unequivocally that neither I nor my Production House had any deliberate or malicious intention of outraging the religious feelings of any class of citizens of India."

He further asserted that the film "does not insult or attempt to insult any religion, or community or the religious beliefs of any class of citizens of India, whether by words, visual depiction, title, promotional material, electronic means, or otherwise."

Referring to objections raised after the teaser release on February 3, the affidavit said the promotional material was withdrawn within days.

"After considering the concerns received from members of the public...the deponent withdrew the promotional materials relating to the film on 6 February 2026," it stated, clarifying that there was "never any intention to demean any religion, caste, or community."

The producer informed the apex court that the disputed title would no longer be used. "I respectfully submit that the earlier title, 'Ghooskhor Pandat', stands unequivocally withdrawn and shall not be used in any manner whatsoever," the affidavit said.

It added that any new title yet to be finalised "shall not be similar to, or evocative of, the earlier title" and would accurately reflect the narrative without giving rise to unintended interpretations.

The affidavit clarified that the movie is "a fictional police drama that revolves around a criminal investigation" and "does not portray any caste, religion, community, or sect as corrupt."

The producer additionally placed on record that a similar writ petition raising identical concerns had earlier been filed before the Delhi High Court. It said the Delhi High Court, in an order passed on February 10, disposed of the petition after recording the statement that the title would be changed, observing that nothing further survived for adjudication.

Pandey prayed that the petition before the Supreme Court be disposed of in similar terms.

The affidavit comes after the Supreme Court, on February 12, came down heavily on the filmmakers over the title 'Ghooskhor Pandat', observing that freedom of speech and expression cannot be used as a licence to denigrate a section of society.

A Bench of Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan had issued notice to the Centre, the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), and the filmmaker, while indicating that the film would not be permitted to release unless the title was changed.

"Freedom of speech and expression does not mean you can portray a community in a bad light," the apex court had remarked, cautioning that such nomenclature could disturb social harmony at a time when societal tensions already exist.

The PIL before the Supreme Court alleged that the film's title and storyline promote caste- and religion-based stereotyping and hurt the dignity and religious sentiments of the Brahmin community.

It contended that equating the caste identifier "Pandit" with "ghooskhor" (bribe-taker) creates a defamatory stereotype against an identifiable community and violates Articles 14, 19(2), 21, 25 and 51A(e) of the Constitution.

The plea, filed by Atul Mishra, National Organisation Secretary of the Brahman Samaj of India, through advocate Dr Vinod Kumar Tewari, has sought a direction restraining the release or screening of the film in its present form.

In the previous hearing, appearing for filmmaker Pandey, counsel submitted that the trailer had already been removed from social media platforms and that the title of the film was being changed. The Supreme Court had then directed the producer to file an affidavit placing on record the steps taken, including the proposed change of title.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

P
Priya S
This is a welcome step. As an audience, I'm tired of movies using provocative titles just for marketing. It's good they listened to public concern and the court's direction. The focus should be on storytelling, not sensationalism. 👍
R
Rohit P
Honestly, the whole controversy felt unnecessary from the start. If the film doesn't actually target any community, then changing the title should settle it. But I do wonder why such a title was chosen in the first place? Seems like they were looking for trouble.
S
Sarah B
Respectful criticism: While I appreciate the title change, the affidavit feels like damage control after being called out. Filmmakers should be more sensitive during the creative process itself, not just react when there's backlash. Our diverse society needs more thoughtful content creation.
V
Vikram M
The Supreme Court's stance is important for maintaining social harmony. We've seen how small sparks can create big fires in our country. Better to be cautious with titles that single out any community, even unintentionally. Jai Hind!
K
Kavya N
Now that the title is changed, I hope people will judge the film by its actual content when it releases. Neeraj Pandey makes good thrillers usually. Let's move on and focus on whether the movie is good or not! 🎬

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50