Delhi HC: Bars Must Balance Business Rights with Peaceful Environment

The Delhi High Court has emphasized that the right of bars to operate must be balanced against citizens' rights to a peaceful environment. The observation came while disposing of a petition against a bar allegedly operating beyond permissible hours. The court strongly remarked that public authorities must not remain inert to genuine citizen complaints, as it erodes public confidence. It directed the Excise Commissioner to examine the grievance and pass orders within two months.

Key Points: Delhi HC on Bar Operations vs Citizen Rights to Peace

  • Bars must balance business with public peace
  • Court directs action on citizen complaints
  • Authorities must not be inert to grievances
  • Regulatory bodies ordered to work in tandem
3 min read

Bar operations must balance business rights with citizens' right to peaceful environment: Delhi HC

Delhi High Court rules bar operations must be balanced with citizens' right to a noise-free, peaceful environment. Details on the case and court directives.

"The right to operate and run a bar/pub must be balanced with the citizens' and children's right to a noise-free, peaceful, and orderly environment. - Delhi High Court"

New Delhi, Feb 17

The Delhi High Court has observed that while bars and pubs are permitted to operate under the law, their right to carry on business must be balanced with the citizens' and children's right to a noise-free, peaceful and orderly environment.

Disposing of a writ petition filed by a resident seeking action against Bunon Bar and Lounge at R.K. Ashram Marg Metro Station for allegedly operating beyond permissible hours, a single-judge Bench of Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav said that regulatory authorities are duty-bound to examine and decide citizens' complaints in accordance with law.

"The right to operate and run a bar/pub must be balanced with the citizens' and children's right to a noise-free, peaceful, and orderly environment," the Delhi High Court observed.

The petitioner, who appeared in person through video conferencing, alleged that the bar continued operations till 2.12 a.m. and on certain occasions even till 4.30 a.m., despite the requirement that such establishments cannot function beyond 1 a.m.

He also claimed that instead of issuing GST bills, the establishment provided "kachchi (rough) handwritten slips" and that repeated complaints to authorities, including the Commissioner of Delhi Police and the Excise Department, had elicited no response.

Referring to the regulatory framework under the Delhi Excise Act, 2009, and the Delhi Excise Rules, 2010, Justice Kaurav noted that the hours for the sale of liquor are to be specified by the Excise Commissioner, while complaints relating to public nuisance are to be considered by the District Magistrate under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

In strong remarks on accountability of public authorities, the Delhi High Court said: "In a civilised society, governed by the rule of law, a genuine complaint of a citizen should not remain unattended. The authorities are under an obligation to consider and decide upon the same in accordance with the extant rules and regulations."

It added that the rule of law requires not merely the existence of laws but also their timely and effective enforcement.

"When authorities continue to be inert on the face of complaints made to it by citizens, it not only erodes public confidence in governance, but also makes that sole individual of this country feel remediless," Justice Kaurav said.

Observing that not every citizen has easy access to courts and that public authorities effectively function as grievance redressal forums, the Delhi High Court directed that the writ petition be treated as a representation by the Excise Commissioner.

Justice Kaurav ordered the Excise Commissioner concerned to examine the petitioner's grievance and pass appropriate orders within two months from receipt of the order. It further directed that if the matter requires consideration by the District Magistrate, all authorities must "work in tandem" to ensure that the complaint is dealt with appropriately.

"All rights and contentions of the parties are left open," the Delhi High Court clarified while disposing of the petition.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

R
Rohit P
This is a big issue in many Delhi colonies. These bars operate with impunity, flouting all rules. Providing "kachchi" bills shows they are trying to evade taxes too. The Excise Department and police need to be more proactive. Hope this order leads to some action.
A
Aman W
While I agree with the need for peace, we also need a vibrant nightlife for a metro city. The solution isn't to shut everything down at 1 AM. Maybe designated zones with relaxed timings? Authorities should enforce rules properly, but also update outdated regulations.
S
Sarah B
The court's point about authorities being "inert" is so true. It's frustrating when complaints go into a black hole. This citizen had to go to the High Court for a basic noise complaint! This shows a systemic failure in local grievance redressal.
V
Vikram M
Balance is key. Bars provide jobs and entertainment. But operating till 4:30 AM next to a residential area is pure nuisance. The "work in tandem" direction to authorities is crucial. Often, police say it's excise's problem, excise says it's DM's problem, and nothing happens.
N
Nisha Z
As a mother, I fully support this. Our right to a peaceful environment for our families is fundamental. Loud music, drunk people shouting on streets late at night... it's a safety and health issue. Rules exist for a reason, they must be enforced. 👏

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50