FICCI Urges Tax Appeal Reforms in Budget 2026-27 to Ease Business Burden

The Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) has outlined key tax-related expectations for the upcoming Union Budget 2026-27. It highlights a massive backlog of approximately 5.4 lakh income tax appeal cases, involving over Rs 18 lakh crore, which burdens companies and blocks government revenue. Among its recommendations are measures to fast-track the disposal of these appeals, provide clarity on tax-neutral mergers and demergers, and expand the network of Customs Advance Ruling authorities beyond Delhi and Mumbai. The chamber argues these steps are crucial for improving the ease of doing business, reducing litigation, and unlocking capital stuck in legal disputes.

Key Points: FICCI Budget Wishlist: Fast-Track Tax Appeals, Cut Litigation

  • Reduce 5.4 lakh pending tax appeals
  • Provide tax neutrality for fast-track mergers
  • Establish more Customs Advance Ruling offices
  • Restore old Act's Associated Enterprise definition
  • Centralize Trade Notices in a real-time database
4 min read

FICCI seeks steps to fast-track tax appeal cases in Budget 2026-27

FICCI calls for reducing 5.4 lakh pending tax appeals, tax-neutral mergers, and more Customs AAR offices in its pre-Budget recommendations for 2026-27.

"Reduction of pendency... is critical to the success of the new Faceless Appeal system - FICCI Statement"

New Delhi, Jan 13

Apex business chamber FICCI on Tuesday listed its key expectations from Union Budget 2026-2027 regarding direct taxes and processes dealing with customs collections that include a reduction in the pendency of appeal cases, and tax neutrality for fast-track mergers.

According to a FICCI statement, the reduction of pendency before the Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeals, is critical to the success of the new Faceless Appeal system and for alleviating hardships faced by taxpayers by way of demands and blockage of refunds.

It has highlighted that currently, there is a huge pendency of appeals filed before CIT(A). Around 5.4 lakh cases are stuck there as on April 1, 2025, involving an amount of Rs 18.16 lakh crore.

Further, the Central Action Plan (CAP) for 2025-26 targets call for disposing of 2 lakh cases and Rs 10 lakh crore of disputed demand for various charges (international tax and transfer pricing, central faceless and JCIT (appeals)). Without capacity augmentation or differentiated tracks and timelines for disposal, it is infeasible to clear the backlog, it said.

Pending litigation reflects as contingent liabilities in the books of companies, pulling down the valuation of their shares during the sale of shares by Indian promoters to FDI investors. The government also loses revenue due to the high pendency of cases, the statement said.

FICCI has also sought the rationalisation of provisions to facilitate obtaining a full stay of demand during the pendency of appeals to unlock amounts locked up in litigation, ease working capital blockage for taxpayers without adversely impacting the interest of revenue collection.

The business chamber has further stated that providing clarity on the tax neutrality of fast-track demergers will facilitate demergers in small-sized companies and intra-group restructuring in a smaller time frame, relieve the burden on NCLT for processing such applications, and thereby improve "ease of doing business" without adversely impacting revenue's interests.

It has also sought restoration of the Associated Enterprise (AE) definition in the new Act as per the old Act. This will preserve continuity of tax policy as recommended by the Select Committee; provide certainty on TP compliance for taxpayers and avoid unwarranted litigation on coverage of AEs, the statement said.

FICCI's wishlist on indirect taxes includes the constitution of more offices of the Customs Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR). Expanding Customs AAR offices and allowing self-declared extensions would enhance trade certainty, reduce compliance burden and lower litigation on customs matters, it said.

At present, the offices of the CAAR are established only in New Delhi and Mumbai, with an all-India jurisdictional division between them. This is despite a considerable number of applications being made by trade involved in ports in the south and east of the country, such as Chennai, Hyderabad, Kolkata, etc.

It is accordingly requested that the government may consider the establishment of at least two more offices of the Authority to cover the south and east of India. This measure will go a long way in bringing certainty to the trade and reducing litigations on Customs matters, the FICCI statement said.

The business chamber has also sought the benefit of Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) certification for newly incorporated companies of AEO-accredited groups. Granting AEO status to new or restructured group companies would cut compliance delays, enhance trade facilitation and enable Customs officials to focus on high-risk taxpayers, the statement said.

Lastly, FICCI has urged the government to provide facilitation measures to importers and exporters through Centralising Trade Notices in a real-time web database to enhance transparency and streamline access.

Presently, various Trade Notices are being issued by various Customs Commissionerates to facilitate the export and import process. These Trade Notices can be viewed through the website of the respective Customs Commissionerate, or at times, the importers/exporters had to personally visit the Customs House to obtain these trade notices. The centralised system will bring greater assessment transparency and will also ensure that assessment practices across all customs ports are uniform, the statement added.

- IANS

Share this article:

Reader Comments

S
Sarah B
As someone working in an MNC's finance team, the point about contingent liabilities pulling down valuations is spot on. Foreign investors get very nervous seeing these unresolved tax disputes on the books. Speeding up the appeal process will directly improve FDI inflows. Hope the budget addresses this.
A
Arjun K
Good suggestions, but I hope this doesn't become another system that only benefits large corporates. The faceless appeal system needs to work efficiently for MSMEs and individual taxpayers too. Our working capital gets completely blocked waiting for refunds. The budget must ensure relief reaches all levels.
P
Priyanka N
Having Customs AAR offices only in Delhi and Mumbai is so outdated! 🇮🇳 Chennai and Kolkata ports handle huge volumes. Exporters from South and East India have to travel or hire expensive consultants just for clarity. Establishing more offices is a basic need for trade facilitation. This should have been done years ago.
M
Michael C
The centralised database for Trade Notices is a brilliant, low-hanging fruit. Currently, it's a nightmare to track notices from different commissionerates. A single, real-time portal would save countless hours and reduce errors. It's a simple tech solution that can have a big impact on transparency.
K
Karthik V
While I agree with reducing pendency, I respectfully disagree with the demand for a "full stay of demand" during appeals. This could be misused to delay legitimate tax payments indefinitely. The system needs balance - faster disposal yes, but also mechanisms to ensure revenue isn't held up without good reason.

We welcome thoughtful discussions from our readers. Please keep comments respectful and on-topic.

Leave a Comment

Minimum 50 characters 0/50